These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1633555)

  • 1. Call patterns and basilar papilla tuning in cricket frogs. II. Intrapopulation variation and allometry.
    Keddy-Hector AC; Wilczynski W; Ryan MJ
    Brain Behav Evol; 1992; 39(4):238-46. PubMed ID: 1633555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Call patterns and basilar papilla tuning in cricket frogs. I. Differences among populations and between sexes.
    Wilczynski W; Keddy-Hector AC; Ryan MJ
    Brain Behav Evol; 1992; 39(4):229-37. PubMed ID: 1633554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acoustic, auditory, and morphological divergence in three species of neotropical frog.
    Wilczynski W; McClelland BE; Rand AS
    J Comp Physiol A; 1993 May; 172(4):425-38. PubMed ID: 8315606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Correlations between call characteristics and morphology in male cricket frogs (Acris crepitans).
    McClelland BE; Wilczynski W; Ryan MJ
    J Exp Biol; 1996 Sep; 199(Pt 9):1907-19. PubMed ID: 8831143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Characteristics of courtship calls of Microhyla ornata (Anura: Microhylidae)].
    Wei L; Shao WW; Lin ZH
    Dongwuxue Yanjiu; 2013 Feb; 34(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 23389973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Advertisement-call preferences in diploid-tetraploid treefrogs (Hyla chrysoscelis and Hyla versicolor): implications for mate choice and the evolution of communication systems.
    Gerhardt HC
    Evolution; 2005 Feb; 59(2):395-408. PubMed ID: 15807424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Arginine vasotocin injection increases probability of calling in cricket frogs, but causes call changes characteristic of less aggressive males.
    Marler CA; Chu J; Wilczynski W
    Horm Behav; 1995 Dec; 29(4):554-70. PubMed ID: 8748513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of the linear tuning properties of two classes of axons in the bullfrog lagena.
    Cortopassi KA; Lewis ER
    Brain Behav Evol; 1998; 51(6):331-48. PubMed ID: 9623909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sexual selection in female perceptual space: how female túngara frogs perceive and respond to complex population variation in acoustic mating signals.
    Ryan MJ; Rand AS
    Evolution; 2003 Nov; 57(11):2608-18. PubMed ID: 14686535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The mechanism of sound production in túngara frogs and its role in sexual selection and speciation.
    Ryan MJ; Guerra MA
    Curr Opin Neurobiol; 2014 Oct; 28():54-9. PubMed ID: 25033110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does sexual dimorphism vary by population? Laryngeal and ear anatomy in cricket frogs.
    McClelland BE; Ryan MJ; Wilczynski W
    Curr Zool; 2019 Jun; 65(3):343-352. PubMed ID: 31263493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Coevolution of sender and receiver: effect on local mate preferecnce in cricket frogs.
    Ryan MJ
    Science; 1988 Jun; 240(4860):1786. PubMed ID: 17842431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mating vocalizations of female frogs: control and evolutionary mechanisms.
    Emerson SB; Boyd SK
    Brain Behav Evol; 1999; 53(4):187-97. PubMed ID: 10343085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Female reciprocal calling in the Iberian midwife toad (Alytes cisternasii) varies with male call rate and dominant frequency: implications for sexual selection.
    Bosch J
    Naturwissenschaften; 2001 Oct; 88(10):435-7. PubMed ID: 11729811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Geographic variation in advertisement calls in a tree frog species: gene flow and selection hypotheses.
    Jang Y; Hahm EH; Lee HJ; Park S; Won YJ; Choe JC
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(8):e23297. PubMed ID: 21858061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sexual selection for sensory exploitation in the frog Physalaemus pustulosus.
    Ryan MJ; Fox JH; Wilczynski W; Rand AS
    Nature; 1990 Jan; 343(6253):66-7. PubMed ID: 2296291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intraspecific variation in laryngeal and ear morphology in male cricket frogs (Acris crepitans).
    McCLELLAND BE; Wilczynski W; Ryan MJ
    Biol J Linn Soc Lond; 1998 Jan; 63(1):51-67. PubMed ID: 9480730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neural adaptations for processing the two-note call of the Puerto Rican treefrog, Eleutherodactylus coqui.
    Narins PM; Capranica RR
    Brain Behav Evol; 1980; 17(1):48-66. PubMed ID: 7370724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Recognition of spectral patterns in the green treefrog: neurobiology and evolution.
    Gerhardt HC
    Exp Biol; 1986; 45(3):167-78. PubMed ID: 3525220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Frequency matching of vocalizations to inner-ear sensitivity along an altitudinal gradient in the coqui frog.
    Meenderink SW; Kits M; Narins PM
    Biol Lett; 2010 Apr; 6(2):278-81. PubMed ID: 19939848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.