These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1633580)
1. Assessment of the effectiveness of dental sterilizers using biological monitors. McErlane B; Rosebush WJ; Waterfield JD J Can Dent Assoc; 1992 Jun; 58(6):481-3. PubMed ID: 1633580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sixteen years of experience with sterilization monitoring. Molinari JA; Gleason MJ; Merchant VA Compendium; 1994 Dec; 15(12):1422-4, 1426-8 passim; quiz 1432. PubMed ID: 7758029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability of biologic indicators in a mail-return sterilization-monitoring service: a review of 3 years. Andrés MT; Tejerina JM; Fierro JF Quintessence Int; 1995 Dec; 26(12):865-70. PubMed ID: 8596817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sterilization beneath rings on dental instruments. Miller CH; Sheldrake MA Am J Dent; 1991 Dec; 4(6):291-3. PubMed ID: 1814351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sterilization of slide sheath anesthetic injection systems placed within sharps containers. Palenik CJ; Burke FJ; Bose M; Altweis ML J Indiana Dent Assoc; 1997; 76(1):45-50; quiz 52. PubMed ID: 9517339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The ability of biological indicators to detect sterilization failures. Miller CH; Sheldrake MA Am J Dent; 1994 Apr; 7(2):95-7. PubMed ID: 8054194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effectiveness of three types of sterilization on the contents of sharps containers. Sheldrake MA; Majors CD; Gaines DJ; Palenik CJ Quintessence Int; 1995 Nov; 26(11):771-8. PubMed ID: 8628836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of sterilization monitoring for dental offices in Ohio. Messieha N; Rosen S; Beck FM Ohio Dent J; 1990; 64(2):8-13. PubMed ID: 2129135 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Effectiveness of salt versus glass bead sterilizers. Haddad AJ; Girard B; Bouclin R; Valois M; Landry RG J Can Dent Assoc; 1997 Jun; 63(6):448-53. PubMed ID: 9203778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Use of and verification with biological indicators in sterilizers belonging to dentistry surgeons from San Luis Potosi, Mexico]. Patiño-Marín N; Loyola-Rodríguez JP; Tovar-Reyes LF Salud Publica Mex; 2001; 43(5):455-8. PubMed ID: 11763693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biological monitoring of sterilizers and sterilization failures in Norwegian dental offices in 1985 and 1996. Skaug N; Lingaas E; Nielsen O; Palenik CJ Acta Odontol Scand; 1999 Aug; 57(4):175-80. PubMed ID: 10540925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sterilizer monitoring: option or responsibility? Lado EA; Stout FW Gen Dent; 1994; 42(6):560-3. PubMed ID: 23087987 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. An evaluation of sterilization of endodontic instruments in artificial sponges. Vélez AE; Thomas DD; del Río CE J Endod; 1998 Jan; 24(1):51-3. PubMed ID: 9487869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effectiveness of steam sterilization in killing spores of Bacillus stearothermophilus in prophylaxis angles. Barnes CM; Anderson NA; Li Y; Caufield PW Gen Dent; 1994; 42(5):456-8. PubMed ID: 7489880 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [The Chemiklaven 7000/8000 on the test bench]. Guggenheim B Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1995; 105(4):455-60. PubMed ID: 7754333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]