357 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16336062)
1. Radiology by nonradiologists: is report documentation adequate?
Weiner SN
Am J Manag Care; 2005 Dec; 11(12):781-5. PubMed ID: 16336062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A new method of evaluating the quality of radiology reports.
Lee R; Cohen MD; Jennings GS
Acad Radiol; 2006 Feb; 13(2):241-8. PubMed ID: 16428061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimized delivery radiological reports: applying Six Sigma methodology to a radiology department.
Cavagna E; Berletti R; Schiavon F; Scarsi B; Barbato G
Radiol Med; 2003 Mar; 105(3):205-14. PubMed ID: 12835644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Discordance rates between preliminary and final radiology reports on cross-sectional imaging studies at a level 1 trauma center.
Stevens KJ; Griffiths KL; Rosenberg J; Mahadevan S; Zatz LM; Leung AN
Acad Radiol; 2008 Oct; 15(10):1217-26. PubMed ID: 18790392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preliminary reports in the emergency department: is a subspecialist radiologist more accurate than a radiology resident?
Branstetter BF; Morgan MB; Nesbit CE; Phillips JA; Lionetti DM; Chang PJ; Towers JD
Acad Radiol; 2007 Feb; 14(2):201-6. PubMed ID: 17236993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improving the quality of radiology reporting: a physician survey to define the target.
Johnson AJ; Ying J; Swan JS; Williams LS; Applegate KE; Littenberg B
J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Jul; 1(7):497-505. PubMed ID: 17411639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiology performed by nonradiologists in the United States: who does what?
Sunshine JH; Bansal S; Evens RG
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Aug; 161(2):419-29; discussion 430-1. PubMed ID: 8333388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quality--a radiology imperative: interpretation accuracy and pertinence.
Lee JK
J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Mar; 4(3):162-5. PubMed ID: 17412256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Communication and documentation of preliminary and final radiology reports.
Monico E; Schwartz I
J Healthc Risk Manag; 2010; 30(1):23-5. PubMed ID: 20677241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The relationship between oncologists and peripheral hospital radiologists in the North-West of England.
Bungay PM; Carrington BM; Corgié D; Eardley A
Clin Radiol; 2002 Apr; 57(4):300-4. PubMed ID: 12014877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Natural language processing using online analytic processing for assessing recommendations in radiology reports.
Dang PA; Kalra MK; Blake MA; Schultz TJ; Stout M; Lemay PR; Freshman DJ; Halpern EF; Dreyer KJ
J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 Mar; 5(3):197-204. PubMed ID: 18312968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Structure and content of the radiological report: an audit of 94 reports from a university education center].
Bosmans JM; Van Goethem JW; De Schepper AM
JBR-BTR; 2004; 87(5):260-4. PubMed ID: 15587569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Expediting the turnaround of radiology reports: use of total quality management to facilitate radiologists' report signing.
Seltzer SE; Kelly P; Adams DF; Chiango BF; Viera MA; Fener E; Rondeau R; Kazanjian N; Laffel G; Shaffer K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Apr; 162(4):775-81. PubMed ID: 8140990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Inadequate imaging reports do not necessarily compromise care by self-referring clinicians.
Smith PD; Beasley JW; Mundt M
Am J Manag Care; 2006 Jun; 12(6):352; author reply 352, 354. PubMed ID: 16756454
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Frequency of radiology self-referral in abdominal computed tomographic scans and the implied cost.
Blaivas M; Lyon M
Am J Emerg Med; 2007 May; 25(4):396-9. PubMed ID: 17499656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic radiology reporting and communication: the ACR guideline.
Kushner DC; Lucey LL;
J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Jan; 2(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 17411755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improving consistency in radiology reporting through the use of department-wide standardized structured reporting.
Larson DB; Towbin AJ; Pryor RM; Donnelly LF
Radiology; 2013 Apr; 267(1):240-50. PubMed ID: 23329657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radiology report production times: voice recognition vs. transcription.
Gale B; Safriel Y; Lukban A; Kalowitz J; Fleischer J; Gordon D
Radiol Manage; 2001; 23(2):18-22. PubMed ID: 11302062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of a 4-year quality improvement initiative to improve communication of critical imaging test results.
Anthony SG; Prevedello LM; Damiano MM; Gandhi TK; Doubilet PM; Seltzer SE; Khorasani R
Radiology; 2011 Jun; 259(3):802-7. PubMed ID: 21467253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Managing errors in radiology: a working model.
Melvin C; Bodley R; Booth A; Meagher T; Record C; Savage P
Clin Radiol; 2004 Sep; 59(9):841-5. PubMed ID: 15351251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
