196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16336381)
21. Factors associated with residual disease after initial breast-conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ.
Wei S; Kragel CP; Zhang K; Hameed O
Hum Pathol; 2012 Jul; 43(7):986-93. PubMed ID: 22221704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Rates of residual disease with close but negative margins in breast cancer surgery.
Garvey EM; Senior DA; Pockaj BA; Wasif N; Dueck AC; McCullough AE; Ocal IT; Gray RJ
Breast; 2015 Aug; 24(4):413-7. PubMed ID: 25845608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery.
Cabioglu N; Hunt KK; Sahin AA; Kuerer HM; Babiera GV; Singletary SE; Whitman GJ; Ross MI; Ames FC; Feig BW; Buchholz TA; Meric-Bernstam F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Apr; 14(4):1458-71. PubMed ID: 17260108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Repeat surgery following breast conservation and intra-operative sentinel lymph node analysis for breast cancer.
Dabbas N; Cutress RI; Wise M; Yiangou C; Agrawal A
Surgeon; 2013 Oct; 11(5):235-40. PubMed ID: 23453370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Positive or close margins in breast conserving surgery: is re-excision always necessary?
Gurdal SO; Karanlik H; Cabioglu N; Ozcinar B; Yavuz E; Tuzlali S; Ozmen V
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2012 May; 38(5):399-406. PubMed ID: 22440741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Second operation more frequent following breast-conserving treatment for invasive lobular than for invasive non-lobular carcinoma].
de Zeeuw S; Wildenberg F; Strobbe L; Wobbes T
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2009; 153():A56. PubMed ID: 19900317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Preoperative staging with magnetic resonance imaging, with confirmatory biopsy, improves surgical outcomes in women with breast cancer without increasing rates of mastectomy.
Grady I; Gorsuch-Rafferty H; Hadley P
Breast J; 2012; 18(3):214-8. PubMed ID: 22487017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. High resolution intra-operative two-dimensional specimen mammography and its impact on second operation for re-excision of positive margins at final pathology after breast conservation surgery.
Bathla L; Harris A; Davey M; Sharma P; Silva E
Am J Surg; 2011 Oct; 202(4):387-94. PubMed ID: 21943945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Do screen-detected breast cancers have positive margins less often than clinically detected breast cancers?
de Munck L; Siesling S; Bart J; Menke-Pluijmers MB; Otter R; Willemse PH
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2013 Sep; 22(5):398-403. PubMed ID: 23492953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Breast carcinoma diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis before and after the introduction of mass mammographic screening.
Ernst MF; Voogd AC; Coebergh JW; Roukema JA
Cancer; 2004 Apr; 100(7):1337-44. PubMed ID: 15042665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.
Lynge E
APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Risk of local failure in breast cancer patients with lobular carcinoma in situ at the final surgical margins: is re-excision necessary?
Sadek BT; Shenouda MN; Abi Raad RF; Niemierko A; Keruakous AR; Goldberg SI; Taghian AG
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Nov; 87(4):726-30. PubMed ID: 24064317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The value of postlumpectomy mammogram in the management of breast cancer patients presenting with suspiciouis microcalcifications.
Aref A; Youssef E; Washington T; Segel M; Grigorian C; Bongers S; Bouwman D
Cancer J Sci Am; 2000; 6(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 10696735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Usefulness of magnetic resonance in patients with invasive cancer eligible for breast conservation: a comparative study.
Fancellu A; Soro D; Castiglia P; Marras V; Melis M; Cottu P; Cherchi A; Spanu A; Mulas S; Pusceddu C; Simbula L; Meloni GB
Clin Breast Cancer; 2014 Apr; 14(2):114-21. PubMed ID: 24321101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Reoperation after breast-conserving surgery for cancer in Australia: statewide cohort study of linked hospital data.
van Leeuwen MT; Falster MO; Vajdic CM; Crowe PJ; Lujic S; Klaes E; Jorm L; Sedrakyan A
BMJ Open; 2018 Apr; 8(4):e020858. PubMed ID: 29643165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Close/positive margins after breast-conserving therapy: additional resection or no resection?
Wood WC
Breast; 2013 Aug; 22 Suppl 2():S115-7. PubMed ID: 24074771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Paget's disease of the nipple in a population based cohort.
Dalberg K; Hellborg H; Wärnberg F
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2008 Sep; 111(2):313-9. PubMed ID: 17952590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Mammographically detected, clinically occult ductal carcinoma in situ treated with breast-conserving surgery and definitive breast irradiation.
Solin LJ; McCormick B; Recht A; Haffty BG; Taylor ME; Kuske RR; Bornstein BA; McNeese M; Schultz DJ; Fowble BL; Barrett W; Yeh IT; Kurtz JM; Amalric R; Fourquet A
Cancer J Sci Am; 1996; 2(3):158-65. PubMed ID: 9166516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effect of mammography screening on surgical treatment for breast cancer in Norway: comparative analysis of cancer registry data.
Suhrke P; Mæhlen J; Schlichting E; Jørgensen KJ; Gøtzsche PC; Zahl PH
BMJ; 2011 Sep; 343():d4692. PubMed ID: 21914765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Predictive factors for residual disease in re-excision specimens after breast-conserving surgery.
Atalay C; Irkkan C
Breast J; 2012; 18(4):339-44. PubMed ID: 22616572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
