These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16337123)

  • 1. Systematic cavity shaves reduces close margins and re-excision rates in breast conserving surgery.
    Janes SE; Stankhe M; Singh S; Isgar B
    Breast; 2006 Jun; 15(3):326-30. PubMed ID: 16337123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy?
    Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Cohen JM; Feldman SM
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1045-50. PubMed ID: 17206481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of cavity shaving on reoperation rate following breast-conserving surgery.
    Marudanayagam R; Singhal R; Tanchel B; O'Connor B; Balasubramanian B; Paterson I
    Breast J; 2008; 14(6):570-3. PubMed ID: 19000040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery.
    Cabioglu N; Hunt KK; Sahin AA; Kuerer HM; Babiera GV; Singletary SE; Whitman GJ; Ross MI; Ames FC; Feig BW; Buchholz TA; Meric-Bernstam F
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Apr; 14(4):1458-71. PubMed ID: 17260108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of additional tumor cavity sampling at the time of breast-conserving surgery on final margin status, volume of resection, and pathologist workload.
    Rizzo M; Iyengar R; Gabram SG; Park J; Birdsong G; Chandler KL; Mosunjac MB
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2010 Jan; 17(1):228-34. PubMed ID: 19636625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do additional shaved margins at the time of lumpectomy eliminate the need for re-excision?
    Jacobson AF; Asad J; Boolbol SK; Osborne MP; Boachie-Adjei K; Feldman SM
    Am J Surg; 2008 Oct; 196(4):556-8. PubMed ID: 18809063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predictors of re-excision among women undergoing breast-conserving surgery for cancer.
    Waljee JF; Hu ES; Newman LA; Alderman AK
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 May; 15(5):1297-303. PubMed ID: 18259820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of additional surgical margins on the total specimen volume excised and the reoperative rate after breast-conserving surgery.
    Huston TL; Pigalarga R; Osborne MP; Tousimis E
    Am J Surg; 2006 Oct; 192(4):509-12. PubMed ID: 16978962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intraoperative margin assessment and re-excision rate in breast conserving surgery.
    Fleming FJ; Hill AD; Mc Dermott EW; O'Doherty A; O'Higgins NJ; Quinn CM
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2004 Apr; 30(3):233-7. PubMed ID: 15028301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Frozen section analysis for intraoperative margin assessment during breast-conserving surgery results in low rates of re-excision and local recurrence.
    Olson TP; Harter J; Muñoz A; Mahvi DM; Breslin T
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2953-60. PubMed ID: 17674109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of routine cavity shave margins on breast cancer re-excision rates.
    Kobbermann A; Unzeitig A; Xie XJ; Yan J; Euhus D; Peng Y; Sarode V; Moldrem A; Marilyn Leitch A; Andrews V; Stallings C; Rao R
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 May; 18(5):1349-55. PubMed ID: 21046260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Involved anterior margins after breast conserving surgery: is re-excision required?
    Mullen R; Macaskill EJ; Khalil A; Elseedawy E; Brown DC; Lee AC; Purdie CA; Jordan LB; Thompson AM
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2012 Apr; 38(4):302-6. PubMed ID: 22285907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors associated with residual breast cancer after re-excision for close or positive margins.
    Cellini C; Hollenbeck ST; Christos P; Martins D; Carson J; Kemper S; Lavigne E; Chan E; Simmons R
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2004 Oct; 11(10):915-20. PubMed ID: 15383425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predictors of surgical margin status in breast-conserving surgery within a breast screening program.
    Kurniawan ED; Wong MH; Windle I; Rose A; Mou A; Buchanan M; Collins JP; Miller JA; Gruen RL; Mann GB
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Sep; 15(9):2542-9. PubMed ID: 18618180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multiple re-excisions versus mastectomy in patients with persistent residual disease following breast conservation surgery.
    Cellini C; Huston TL; Martins D; Christos P; Carson J; Kemper S; Simmons RM
    Am J Surg; 2005 Jun; 189(6):662-6. PubMed ID: 15910716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Routine cavity shaves following breast conserving surgery; friend or foe?
    Monib S; Anis K; Habashy H
    Surg Oncol; 2021 Jun; 37():101521. PubMed ID: 33548588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Low re-excision rate for positive margins in patients treated with ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery.
    Yu CC; Chiang KC; Kuo WL; Shen SC; Lo YF; Chen SC
    Breast; 2013 Oct; 22(5):698-702. PubMed ID: 23333255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Shaves off the Cavity or Specimen in Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer.
    Iwai Y; Prigoff JG; Sun L; Wiechmann L; Taback B; Rao R; Ugras SK
    J Surg Res; 2022 Sep; 277():296-302. PubMed ID: 35526391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of introducing an in-theatre intra-operative specimen radiography (IOSR) system on the management of palpable breast cancer within a single unit.
    Layfield DM; May DJ; Cutress RI; Richardson C; Agrawal A; Wise M; Yiangou C
    Breast; 2012 Aug; 21(4):459-63. PubMed ID: 22119488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of multiple reexcisions on the risk of local recurrence after breast conserving surgery.
    O'Sullivan MJ; Li T; Freedman G; Morrow M
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Nov; 14(11):3133-40. PubMed ID: 17653798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.