These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1633786)

  • 1. Discriminability of load heaviness: implications for the psychophysical approach to manual lifting.
    Karwowski W; Shumate C; Yates JW; Pongpatana N
    Ergonomics; 1992; 35(7-8):729-44. PubMed ID: 1633786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Psychophysical acceptability and perception of load heaviness by females.
    Karwowski W
    Ergonomics; 1991 Apr; 34(4):487-96. PubMed ID: 1860464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Beyond psychophysics: the need for a cognitive engineering approach to setting limits in manual lifting tasks.
    Karwowski W; Lee W; Jamaldin B; Gaddie P; Jang RL; Alqesaimi KK
    Ergonomics; 1999 Jan; 42(1):40-60. PubMed ID: 9973871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Maximum acceptable weight of lift for side and back lifting.
    Lee K; Waikar A; Aghazadeh F
    J Hum Ergol (Tokyo); 1990 Jun; 19(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 2092069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Postural effects on biomechanical and psychophysical weight-lifting limits.
    Chaffin DB; Page GB
    Ergonomics; 1994 Apr; 37(4):663-76. PubMed ID: 8187750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Significance of biomechanical and physiological variables during the determination of maximum acceptable weight of lift.
    Jorgensen MJ; Davis KG; Kirking BC; Lewis KE; Marras WS
    Ergonomics; 1999 Sep; 42(9):1216-32. PubMed ID: 10503055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of isokinetic lifting strength with static strength and maximum acceptable weight with special reference to speed of lifting.
    Garg A; Beller D
    Ergonomics; 1994 Aug; 37(8):1363-74. PubMed ID: 7925260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What is a demanding lifting job for manual handling workers in Hong Kong?
    Yeung SS; Genaidy AM; Deddens J; Leung PC
    Ergonomics; 2003 May; 46(6):574-97. PubMed ID: 12745689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The psychophysical approach to manual materials handling task design.
    Ayoub MM; Dempsey PG
    Ergonomics; 1999 Jan; 42(1):17-31. PubMed ID: 9973869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Psychophysical capacity of industrial workers for lifting symmetrical and asymmetrical loads symmetrically and asymmetrically for 8 h work shifts.
    Mital A
    Ergonomics; 1992; 35(7-8):745-54. PubMed ID: 1633787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Psychophysically acceptable weights for a combination lifting task using bags with handles.
    Fredericks TK; Fernandez JE; Rodrigues CC
    J Hum Ergol (Tokyo); 1994 Dec; 23(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 7730595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the sensitivity of three psychophysical techniques to three manual materials handling task variables.
    Kumar S; Narayan Y; Bjornsdottir S
    Ergonomics; 1999 Jan; 42(1):61-73. PubMed ID: 9973872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of asymmetric dynamic and isometric liftings on strength/force and rating of perceived exertion.
    Hattori Y; Ono Y; Shimaoka M; Hiruta S; Kamijima M; Shibata E; Ichihara G; Ando S; Villaneuva MB; Takeuchi Y
    Ergonomics; 1996 Jun; 39(6):862-76. PubMed ID: 8681928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Low-back stresses when learning to use a materials handling device.
    Chaffin DB; Stump BS; Nussbaum MA; Baker G
    Ergonomics; 1999 Jan; 42(1):94-110. PubMed ID: 9973874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Scaling of lifting forces in relation to object size in whole body lifting.
    Kingma I; Van Dieën JH; Toussaint HM
    Ergonomics; 2005 Jun; 48(8):1020-30. PubMed ID: 16147418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating lifting tasks using subjective and biomechanical estimates of stress at the lower back.
    Waikar A; Lee K; Aghazadeh F; Parks C
    Ergonomics; 1991 Jan; 34(1):33-47. PubMed ID: 2009848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A manual materials handling study of bag lifting.
    Smith JL; Jiang BC
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1984 Aug; 45(8):505-8. PubMed ID: 6475757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Maximum acceptable weights for asymmetric lifting of Chinese females.
    Wu SP
    Appl Ergon; 2003 May; 34(3):215-24. PubMed ID: 12737921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanically and electromyographically assessed load on the spine in self-paced and force-paced lifting work.
    Leskinen TP; Stålhammar HR; Rautanen MT; Troup JD
    Ergonomics; 1992; 35(7-8):881-8. PubMed ID: 1633794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of container size, frequency and extended horizontal reach on maximum acceptable weights of lifting for female industrial workers.
    Ciriello VM
    Appl Ergon; 2007 Jan; 38(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 16616883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.