These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1633788)

  • 1. Margin of safety for the human back: a probable consensus based on published studies.
    Kumar S; Mital A
    Ergonomics; 1992; 35(7-8):769-81. PubMed ID: 1633788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A psychophysical approach to determine the frequency and duration of work-rest schedules for manual handling operations.
    Genaidy AM; al-Rayes S
    Ergonomics; 1993 May; 36(5):509-18. PubMed ID: 8500472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cut-points to prevent low back injury due to force exertion at work.
    Vieira ER; Kumar S
    Work; 2006; 27(1):75-87. PubMed ID: 16873983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Postural effects on biomechanical and psychophysical weight-lifting limits.
    Chaffin DB; Page GB
    Ergonomics; 1994 Apr; 37(4):663-76. PubMed ID: 8187750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Low back problems and possible improvements in nursing jobs.
    Vieira ER; Kumar S; Coury HJ; Narayan Y
    J Adv Nurs; 2006 Jul; 55(1):79-89. PubMed ID: 16768742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Psychophysical capacity of industrial workers for lifting symmetrical and asymmetrical loads symmetrically and asymmetrically for 8 h work shifts.
    Mital A
    Ergonomics; 1992; 35(7-8):745-54. PubMed ID: 1633787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The psychophysical approach to manual materials handling task design.
    Ayoub MM; Dempsey PG
    Ergonomics; 1999 Jan; 42(1):17-31. PubMed ID: 9973869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The load on the lumbar spine during asymmetrical bi-manual materials handling.
    Jäger M; Luttmann A
    Ergonomics; 1992; 35(7-8):783-805. PubMed ID: 1633789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relation between spinal load factors and the high-risk probability of occupational low-back disorder.
    Granata KP; Marras WS
    Ergonomics; 1999 Sep; 42(9):1187-99. PubMed ID: 10503053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Workplace risk factors and occupational musculoskeletal disorders, Part 1: A review of biomechanical and psychophysical research on risk factors associated with low-back pain.
    Keyserling WM
    AIHAJ; 2000; 61(1):39-50. PubMed ID: 10772613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Psychological mechanisms in the transition from acute to chronic pain: over- or underrated?].
    Hasenbring M; Hallner D; Klasen B
    Schmerz; 2001 Dec; 15(6):442-7. PubMed ID: 11793149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Loading along the lumbar spine as influence by speed, control, load magnitude, and handle height during pushing.
    Marras WS; Knapik GG; Ferguson S
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Feb; 24(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 19111950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A video-based method for evaluation of low-back load in long-cycle jobs.
    Wickström G; Laine M; Pentti J; Hyytiäinen K; Salminen JJ
    Ergonomics; 1996 Jun; 39(6):826-41. PubMed ID: 8681926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comprehensive manual handling limits for lowering, pushing, pulling and carrying activities.
    Shoaf C; Genaidy A; Karwowski W; Waters T; Christensen D
    Ergonomics; 1997 Nov; 40(11):1183-200. PubMed ID: 9375533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The time-varying response of the in vivo lumbar spine to dynamic repetitive flexion.
    Parkinson RJ; Beach TA; Callaghan JP
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2004 May; 19(4):330-6. PubMed ID: 15109751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Low-back stresses when learning to use a materials handling device.
    Chaffin DB; Stump BS; Nussbaum MA; Baker G
    Ergonomics; 1999 Jan; 42(1):94-110. PubMed ID: 9973874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factors associated with the subject's ability to quantify their lumbar flexion demands at work.
    Martin F; Matthias P
    Int J Environ Health Res; 2006 Feb; 16(1):69-79. PubMed ID: 16507482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Discriminability of load heaviness: implications for the psychophysical approach to manual lifting.
    Karwowski W; Shumate C; Yates JW; Pongpatana N
    Ergonomics; 1992; 35(7-8):729-44. PubMed ID: 1633786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Agreement between a frequency-weighted filter for continuous biomechanical measurements of repetitive wrist flexion against a load and published psychophysical data.
    Lin ML; Radwin RG
    Ergonomics; 1998 Apr; 41(4):459-75. PubMed ID: 9557587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Studies of spinal shrinkage to evaluate low-back loading in the workplace.
    McGill SM; van Wijk MJ; Axler CT; Gletsu M
    Ergonomics; 1996 Jan; 39(1):92-102. PubMed ID: 8851075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.