BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16337986)

  • 1. Drift of 10 herbicides after tractor spray application. 2. Primary drift (droplet drift).
    Carlsen SC; Spliid NH; Svensmark B
    Chemosphere; 2006 Jul; 64(5):778-86. PubMed ID: 16337986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Drift of 10 herbicides after tractor spray application. 1. Secondary drift (evaporation).
    Carlsen SC; Spliid NH; Svensmark B
    Chemosphere; 2006 Jul; 64(5):787-94. PubMed ID: 16337992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Buffer zone and windbreak effects on spray drift deposition in a simulated wetland.
    Brown RB; Carter MH; Stephenson GR
    Pest Manag Sci; 2004 Nov; 60(11):1085-90. PubMed ID: 15532682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of the entrained air and initial droplet velocity on the release height parameter of a Gaussian spray drift model.
    Stainier C; Destain MF; Schiffers B; Lebeau F
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2006; 71(2 Pt A):197-200. PubMed ID: 17390793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Direct and indirect drift assessment means. Part 3: field drift experiments.
    Nuyttens D; De Schampheleire M; Baetens K; Dekeyser D; Sonck B
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):763-7. PubMed ID: 19226826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spray drift as affected by meteorological conditions.
    Nuyttens D; Sonck B; de Schampheleire M; Steurbaut W; Baetens K; Verboven P; Nicolaï B; Ramon H
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2005; 70(4):947-59. PubMed ID: 16628942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Direct and indirect drift assessment means. Part 4: a comparative study.
    Nuyttens D; Baetens K; De Schampheleire M; Sonck B
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):769-74. PubMed ID: 19226827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Field experiment on spray drift: deposition and airborne drift during application to a winter wheat crop.
    Wolters A; Linnemann V; van de Zande JC; Vereecken H
    Sci Total Environ; 2008 Nov; 405(1-3):269-77. PubMed ID: 18723207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of air support on droplet characteristics and spray drift.
    Nuyttens D; Dekeyser D; De Schampheleire M; Baetens K; Sonck B
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2007; 72(2):71-9. PubMed ID: 18399426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Off-target loss in ornamental nurseries with different spray techniques.
    Zhu H; Derksen RC; Krause CR; Zondag RH
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2009; 74(1):25-36. PubMed ID: 20218508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Propanil (3,4-dichloropropionanilide) particulate concentrations within and near the residences of families living adjacent to aerially sprayed rice fields.
    Richards SM; McClure GY; Lavy TL; Mattice JD; Keller RJ; Gandy J
    Arch Environ Contam Toxicol; 2001 Jul; 41(1):112-6. PubMed ID: 11385597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Agrochemical spray drift; assessment and mitigation--a review.
    Felsot AS; Unsworth JB; Linders JB; Roberts G; Rautman D; Harris C; Carazo E
    J Environ Sci Health B; 2011; 46(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 20981606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Direct and indirect drift assessment means. Part 1: PDPA laser based droplet characterisation.
    Nuyttens D; Baetens K; De Schampheleire M; Dekeyser D; Sonck B
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):749-56. PubMed ID: 19226824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Drift studies--comparison of field and wind tunnel experiments.
    Stadler R; Regenauer W
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2005; 70(4):971-3. PubMed ID: 16628944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spray droplet size, drift potential, and risks to nontarget organisms from aerially applied glyphosate for coca control in Colombia.
    Hewitt AJ; Solomon KR; Marshall EJ
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2009; 72(15-16):921-9. PubMed ID: 19672760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Buffer zones for reducing pesticide drift to ditches and risks to aquatic organisms.
    de Snoo GR; de Wit PJ
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 1998 Sep; 41(1):112-8. PubMed ID: 9756699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Field experiments for the evaluation of pesticide spray-drift on arable crops.
    Ravier I; Haouisee E; Clément M; Seux R; Briand O
    Pest Manag Sci; 2005 Aug; 61(8):728-36. PubMed ID: 15822072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Direct and indirect drift assessment means. Part 2: wind tunnel experiments.
    Nuyttens D; De Schampheleire M; Baetens K; Sonck B
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):757-61. PubMed ID: 19226825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of realtime spray drift using RTDrift Gaussian advection-diffusion model.
    Lebeau F; Verstraete A; Schiffers B; Destain MF
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2009; 74(1):11-24. PubMed ID: 20218507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of collectors of airborne spray drift. Experiments in a wind tunnel and field measurements.
    Arvidsson T; Bergström L; Kreuger J
    Pest Manag Sci; 2011 Jun; 67(6):725-33. PubMed ID: 21445941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.