138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16338202)
1. Homeopathic research after the Lancet meta analysis--a moment for introspection.
Oberbaum M; Singer SR; Frass M
Complement Ther Med; 2005 Dec; 13(4):303-5. PubMed ID: 16338202
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Homeopathy again: a questionable meta-analysis.
Prescrire Int; 1998 Jun; 7(35):94-5. PubMed ID: 10342930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Research in homeopathy: from confusion to disillusion or resolution?
van Haselen R; Luedtke R
Complement Ther Med; 2008 Apr; 16(2):59-60. PubMed ID: 18514905
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Research on homeopathy: state of the art.
Walach H; Jonas WB; Ives J; van Wijk R; Weingärtner O
J Altern Complement Med; 2005 Oct; 11(5):813-29. PubMed ID: 16296915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Meta-analysis in medical research: potentials and limitations.
Zwahlen M; Renehan A; Egger M
Urol Oncol; 2008; 26(3):320-9. PubMed ID: 18452828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Homeopathic arnica: just a placebo.
Prescrire Int; 2001 Oct; 10(55):156. PubMed ID: 11824436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prominent doctors and scientists reject Lancet report on homoeopathy.
Saunders B; Gower N
S Afr Med J; 2006 Apr; 96(4):260, 262; discussion 262. PubMed ID: 16670783
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Homeopathy--only a placebo?].
Aly KO
Lakartidningen; 2000 Dec; 97(49):5754. PubMed ID: 11188031
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Advancing research through systematic reviews and meta-analysis: workshop experience.
Alam AY; Zaidi Z; Rahim F; Qureshi AA
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2008 May; 18(5):323-4. PubMed ID: 18541096
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Homeopathic products.
Med Lett Drugs Ther; 1999 Feb; 41(1047):20-1. PubMed ID: 10076593
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluating homeopathic drugs within a biomedical framework.
Calabrese EJ; Jonas WB
Hum Exp Toxicol; 2010 Jul; 29(7):545-9. PubMed ID: 20558604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Statistical considerations in meta-analysis.
Barza M; Trikalinos TA; Lau J
Infect Dis Clin North Am; 2009 Jun; 23(2):195-210, Table of Contents. PubMed ID: 19393905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Out of step with the Lancet homeopathy meta-analysis: more objections than objectivity?
Dean M
J Altern Complement Med; 1998; 4(4):389-98. PubMed ID: 9884176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Study designs in patient-oriented research.
Parikh CR; Concato J
Am J Kidney Dis; 2006 Feb; 47(2):356-64. PubMed ID: 16431267
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Serious mistakes in meta-analysis of homeopathic research.
Vithoulkas G
J Med Life; 2017; 10(1):47-49. PubMed ID: 28255376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Debate regarding homeopathic medicine continues.
Imrie R
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1998 Jul; 213(1):24-5. PubMed ID: 9656014
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Asymmetry in The Lancet meta-analysis.
Frass M; Schuster E; Muchitsch I; Duncan J; Geir W; Kozel G; Kastinger-Mayr C; Felleitner AE; Reiter C; Endler C; Oberbaum M
Homeopathy; 2006 Jan; 95(1):52-3. PubMed ID: 16399256
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Jigsaw of evidence.
Ernst E
Complement Ther Med; 2009 Aug; 17(4):247. PubMed ID: 19632554
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Proof of the effectiveness of homeopathic drugs].
Linde K
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1999 Oct; 124(41):1221-3. PubMed ID: 10572527
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The homeopathic antiarthitic preparation Zeel comp. N: a review of molecular and clinical data.
Birnesser H; Stolt P
Explore (NY); 2007; 3(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 17234564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
