240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16338571)
41. Effect of AcrySof versus silicone or polymethyl methacrylate intraocular lens on posterior capsule opacification.
Li N; Chen X; Zhang J; Zhou Y; Yao X; Du L; Wei M; Liu Y
Ophthalmology; 2008 May; 115(5):830-8. PubMed ID: 17964657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. [Scanning electron microscopic study of 12 lenses of two types of soft acrylic intraocular lenses].
Hesse Y; Freissler KA; Lang GK
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2001 Oct; 218(10):682-7. PubMed ID: 11706385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Posterior capsule opacification in silicone and hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses with sharp-edge optics six years after surgery.
Vock L; Crnej A; Findl O; Neumayer T; Buehl W; Sacu S; Rainer G; Menapace R
Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Apr; 147(4):683-690.e2. PubMed ID: 19201391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. [In vitro adherence of bacteria to intraocular lenses of different materials].
Wu R; Yao K; Sun Z; Xu W; Chen P; Lu M
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 1999 Nov; 35(6):453-5, 26. PubMed ID: 11835860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. On the longitudinal chromatic aberration of the intraocular lenses.
Siedlecki D; Ginis HS
Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Oct; 84(10):984-9. PubMed ID: 18049364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Interlenticular opacification: dual-optic versus piggyback intraocular lenses.
Werner L; Mamalis N; Stevens S; Hunter B; Chew JJ; Vargas LG
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Apr; 32(4):655-61. PubMed ID: 16698490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Differential responses of human lens epithelial cells to intraocular lenses in vitro: hydrophobic acrylic versus PMMA or silicone discs.
Yan Q; Perdue N; Sage EH
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2005 Dec; 243(12):1253-62. PubMed ID: 15909158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Edge profile of commercially available square-edged intraocular lenses.
Nanavaty MA; Spalton DJ; Boyce J; Brain A; Marshall J
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Apr; 34(4):677-86. PubMed ID: 18361993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Biofilm formation by Enterococcus faecalis on intraocular lens material.
Kobayakawa S; Jett BD; Gilmore MS
Curr Eye Res; 2005 Sep; 30(9):741-5. PubMed ID: 16146919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Bacterial adhesion to rigid and foldable posterior chamber intraocular lenses: in vitro study.
Schauersberger J; Amon M; Aichinger D; Georgopoulos A
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2003 Feb; 29(2):361-6. PubMed ID: 12648650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. New photochromic foldable intraocular lens: preliminary study of feasibility and biocompatibility.
Werner L; Mamalis N; Romaniv N; Haymore J; Haugen B; Hunter B; Stevens S
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Jul; 32(7):1214-21. PubMed ID: 16857512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Complications of foldable intraocular lenses requiring explantation or secondary intervention--2007 survey update.
Mamalis N; Brubaker J; Davis D; Espandar L; Werner L
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Sep; 34(9):1584-91. PubMed ID: 18721724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. [Posterior capsule opacification (PCO) following implantation of various types of IOLs--part one: the uncomplicated course].
Krajcová P; Chynoranský M; Strmen P
Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2007 Nov; 63(6):379-89. PubMed ID: 18062161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Hydrophobic acrylic and plate-haptic silicone intraocular lens implantation in diabetic patients: pilot randomized clinical trial.
Elgohary MA; Hollick EJ; Bender LE; Heatley CJ; Wren SM; Boyce J; Missotten T; Spalton DJ; Dowler JG
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Jul; 32(7):1188-95. PubMed ID: 16857508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Prospective intrapatient comparison of 6.0-millimeter optic single-piece and 3-piece hydrophobic acrylic foldable intraocular lenses.
Nejima R; Miyai T; Kataoka Y; Miyata K; Honbou M; Tokunaga T; Kawana K; Kiuchi T; Oshika T
Ophthalmology; 2006 Apr; 113(4):585-90. PubMed ID: 16581420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Influence of fibronectin on the adherence of Staphylococcus epidermidis to coated and uncoated intraocular lenses.
Schroeder AC; Schmidbauer JM; Sobke A; Seitz B; Ruprecht KW; Herrmann M
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Mar; 34(3):497-504. PubMed ID: 18299078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Comparative rotational stability of single-piece open-loop acrylic and plate-haptic silicone toric intraocular lenses.
Chang DF
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Nov; 34(11):1842-7. PubMed ID: 19006728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Two-year follow-up of posterior capsule opacification after implantation of a hydrophilic or hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens.
Kugelberg M; Wejde G; Jayaram H; Zetterström C
Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Aug; 86(5):533-6. PubMed ID: 18081899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Silicone oil adhesion to intraocular lenses: an experimental study comparing various biomaterials.
Apple DJ; Isaacs RT; Kent DG; Martinez LM; Kim S; Thomas SG; Basti S; Barker D; Peng Q
J Cataract Refract Surg; 1997 May; 23(4):536-44. PubMed ID: 9209988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. In vitro adherence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to four intraocular lenses.
Gabriel MM; Ahearn DG; Chan KY; Patel AS
J Cataract Refract Surg; 1998 Jan; 24(1):124-9. PubMed ID: 9494910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
