These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16338581)

  • 1. High IOP as a cause of sudden increased myopia after LASIK.
    Katbab A; Pooyan S; Salouti R; Reza H; Hosseini J
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Oct; 31(10):2031-2. PubMed ID: 16338581
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mechanism of myopic shift associated with high IOP after LASIK.
    Stewart JM
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Jul; 32(7):1075-6. PubMed ID: 16857483
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A predictive model for postoperative intraocular pressure among patients undergoing laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).
    Yang CC; Wang IJ; Chang YC; Lin LL; Chen TH
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Mar; 141(3):530-536. PubMed ID: 16490501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnosis of steroid-induced elevated intraocular pressure and associated lamellar keratitis after laser in situ keratomileusis using optical coherence tomography.
    Levinger E; Slomovic A; Bahar I; Slomovic AR
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Feb; 35(2):386-8. PubMed ID: 19185259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Total refractive regression post-LASIK: case report].
    Gus PI; Matos GH; Bayer MC
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2005; 68(3):393-5. PubMed ID: 16059576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Atypical presentation of ocular hypertension following myopic LASIK].
    Calvo Arrabal MA; Bilbao-Calabuig R; Alén Cordero R; Llovet Osuna F
    Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2005 Mar; 80(3):163-70. PubMed ID: 15803427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intraocular pressure assessment in both eyes of the same patient after laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Hsu SY; Chang MS; Lee CJ
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Jan; 35(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 19101428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An interval-censored model for predicting myopic regression after laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Chen YI; Chien KL; Wang IJ; Yen AM; Chen LS; Lin PJ; Chen TH
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Aug; 48(8):3516-23. PubMed ID: 17652718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bilateral ring scotomas following laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Austin MW; Sreekantam S; Martin S; Hill RJ
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Jun; 32(6):1062-4. PubMed ID: 16814073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A control-matched comparison of laser epithelial keratomileusis and laser in situ keratomileusis for low to moderate myopia.
    Tobaigy FM; Ghanem RC; Sayegh RR; Hallak JA; Azar DT
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Dec; 142(6):901-8. PubMed ID: 17157575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Laser in situ keratomileusis versus surface ablation: visual outcomes and complications.
    Ghadhfan F; Al-Rajhi A; Wagoner MD
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Dec; 33(12):2041-8. PubMed ID: 18053901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. LASEK versus LASIK for the correction of moderate myopia.
    Teus MA; de Benito-Llopis L; Sánchez-Pina JM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Jul; 84(7):605-10. PubMed ID: 17632309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Postoperative changes in intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanical metrics Laser in situ keratomileusis versus laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy.
    Qazi MA; Sanderson JP; Mahmoud AM; Yoon EY; Roberts CJ; Pepose JS
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1774-88. PubMed ID: 19781475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of night driving performance after wavefront-guided and conventional LASIK for moderate myopia.
    Schallhorn SC; Tanzer DJ; Kaupp SE; Brown M; Malady SE
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Apr; 116(4):702-9. PubMed ID: 19344822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Steroid glaucoma after laser in situ keratomileusis].
    Lautebach S; Funk J; Reinhard T; Pache M
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2007 May; 224(5):438-40. PubMed ID: 17516377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of visual results between laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy and epipolis laser in situ keratomileusis to correct myopia and myopic astigmatism.
    Teus MA; de Benito-Llopis L; García-González M
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Sep; 146(3):357-362. PubMed ID: 18614136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Eleven-year follow-up of laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Kymionis GD; Tsiklis NS; Astyrakakis N; Pallikaris AI; Panagopoulou SI; Pallikaris IG
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Feb; 33(2):191-6. PubMed ID: 17276257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Corneal hysteresis using the Reichert ocular response analyser: findings pre- and post-LASIK and LASEK.
    Kirwan C; O'Keefe M
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 86(2):215-8. PubMed ID: 17888086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative study of higher-order aberrations after conventional laser in situ keratomileusis and laser epithelial keratomileusis for myopia using the technolas 217z laser platform.
    Kirwan C; O'Keefe M
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Jan; 147(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 18775529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Five year follow up of laser in situ keratomileusis for all levels of myopia.
    O'Doherty M; O'Keeffe M; Kelleher C
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2006 Jan; 90(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 16361660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.