107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16338803)
1. Measuring clinical performance using routinely collected clinical data.
Prytherch DR; Briggs JS; Weaver PC; Schmidt P; Smith GB
Med Inform Internet Med; 2005 Jun; 30(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 16338803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of "risk-adjusted" hospital outcomes.
Shahian DM; Normand SL
Circulation; 2008 Apr; 117(15):1955-63. PubMed ID: 18391106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of the present-on-admission indicator on hospital quality measurement: experience with the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Inpatient Quality Indicators.
Glance LG; Osler TM; Mukamel DB; Dick AW
Med Care; 2008 Feb; 46(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 18219238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Critical pathway for the management of acute heart failure at the Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System: transforming performance measures into cardiac care.
Gardetto NJ; Greaney K; Arai L; Brenner A; Carroll KC; Howerton NM; Lee M; Pada L; Tseng M; Maisel AS
Crit Pathw Cardiol; 2008 Sep; 7(3):153-72. PubMed ID: 18791404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Databases for assessing the outcomes of the treatment of patients with congenital and paediatric cardiac disease--the perspective of critical care.
LaRovere JM; Jeffries HE; Sachdeva RC; Rice TB; Wetzel RC; Cooper DS; Bird GL; Ghanayem NS; Checchia PA; Chang AC; Wessel DL
Cardiol Young; 2008 Dec; 18 Suppl 2():130-6. PubMed ID: 19063783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Is heart surgery in the Netherlands sufficiently safe?].
de Mol BA
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Feb; 143(7):333-6. PubMed ID: 10221093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of a matching algorithm to evaluate hospital coronary artery bypass grafting performance as an alternative to conventional risk adjustment.
Glance LG; Osler TM; Mukamel DB; Dick AW
Med Care; 2007 Apr; 45(4):292-9. PubMed ID: 17496712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Application of International Classification Injury Severity Score to National Surgical Quality Improvement Program defines pediatric trauma performance standards and drives performance improvement.
Tepas JJ; Celso BG; Leaphart CL; Graham D
J Trauma; 2009 Jul; 67(1):185-8; discussion 188-9. PubMed ID: 19590333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Alternative pay-for-performance scoring methods: implications for quality improvement and patient outcomes.
Glickman SW; Boulding W; Roos JM; Staelin R; Peterson ED; Schulman KA
Med Care; 2009 Oct; 47(10):1062-8. PubMed ID: 19648833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hospital innovativeness and organizational performance: evidence from English public acute care.
Salge TO; Vera A
Health Care Manage Rev; 2009; 34(1):54-67. PubMed ID: 19104264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of pediatric cardiac surgical mortality rates from national administrative data to contemporary clinical standards.
Welke KF; Diggs BS; Karamlou T; Ungerleider RM
Ann Thorac Surg; 2009 Jan; 87(1):216-22; discussion 222-3. PubMed ID: 19101301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Association of a clinical knowledge support system with improved patient safety, reduced complications and shorter length of stay among Medicare beneficiaries in acute care hospitals in the United States.
Bonis PA; Pickens GT; Rind DM; Foster DA
Int J Med Inform; 2008 Nov; 77(11):745-53. PubMed ID: 18565788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Funnel plots for comparing performance of PCI performing hospitals and cardiologists: demonstration of utility using the New York hospital mortality data.
Kunadian B; Dunning J; Roberts AP; Morley R; de Belder MA
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Apr; 73(5):589-94. PubMed ID: 19309714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of procedural volume on outcome of coronary artery bypass graft surgery in Japan: implication toward public reporting and minimal volume standards.
Miyata H; Motomura N; Ueda Y; Matsuda H; Takamoto S
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Jun; 135(6):1306-12. PubMed ID: 18544377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of mortality risk adjustment using a clinical data algorithm (American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program) and an administrative data algorithm (Solucient) at the case level within a single institution.
Hall BL; Hirbe M; Waterman B; Boslaugh S; Dunagan WC
J Am Coll Surg; 2007 Dec; 205(6):767-77. PubMed ID: 18035260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. JCAHO, public are watching: act now to improve cardiac core measure data.
Hosp Peer Rev; 2005 Apr; 30(4):45-8. PubMed ID: 15835272
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality assurance in an adult intensive care unit, Eastern region, Saudi Arabia.
Iqbal M; Rehmani R; Venter J; Alaithan AM
Saudi Med J; 2007 Mar; 28(3):408-11. PubMed ID: 17334470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measuring performance for treating heart attacks and heart failure: the case for outcomes measurement.
Krumholz HM; Normand SL; Spertus JA; Shahian DM; Bradley EH
Health Aff (Millwood); 2007; 26(1):75-85. PubMed ID: 17211016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of inpatient service specialty on care processes and outcomes for patients with non ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.
Roe MT; Chen AY; Mehta RH; Li Y; Brindis RG; Smith SC; Rumsfeld JS; Gibler WB; Ohman EM; Peterson ED
Circulation; 2007 Sep; 116(10):1153-61. PubMed ID: 17709638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. ["Open comparisons" no reliable measures of the quality of care in myocardial infarction. The epidemiological registry is not sufficient for county comparisons].
Ryttberg B; Nyström E; Stenberg A; Palm K; Näslund I
Lakartidningen; 2009 Aug 26-Sep 1; 106(35):2121-4. PubMed ID: 19827376
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
