These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16340628)
21. To Bravo or not? A comparison of wireless esophageal pH monitoring and conventional pH catheter to evaluate non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease in a multiracial Asian cohort. Ang D; Teo EK; Ang TL; Ong J; Poh CH; Tan J; Fock KM J Dig Dis; 2010 Feb; 11(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 20132427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. 48-Hour pH monitoring increases the risk of false positive studies when the capsule is prematurely passed. Iqbal A; Lee YK; Vitamvas M; Oleynikov D J Gastrointest Surg; 2007 May; 11(5):638-41. PubMed ID: 17468923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Clinical utility and tolerability of JSPH-1 wireless esophageal pH monitoring system. Li JN; Liu CL; Tao XH BMC Gastroenterol; 2013 Jan; 13():10. PubMed ID: 23317032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Use and utility of the Bravo pH capsule. Pandolfino JE; Kwiatek MA J Clin Gastroenterol; 2008; 42(5):571-8. PubMed ID: 18364590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Ambulatory pH: monitoring with a wireless system. Schneider JH; Kramer KM; Königsrainer A; Granderath FA Surg Endosc; 2007 Nov; 21(11):2076-80. PubMed ID: 17484003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Nonendoscopic transnasal placement of a wireless capsule for esophageal pH monitoring: feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a manometry-guided procedure. Marchese M; Spada C; Iacopini F; Familiari P; Shah SG; Tringali A; Costamagna G Endoscopy; 2006 Aug; 38(8):813-8. PubMed ID: 17001571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring by using a wireless system: a pilot study in Taiwan. Tu CH; Lee YC; Wang HP; Wu MS; Chiu HM; Lin JT Hepatogastroenterology; 2004; 51(60):1586-9. PubMed ID: 15532783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Simultaneous recordings of oesophageal acid exposure with conventional pH monitoring and a wireless system (Bravo). des Varannes SB; Mion F; Ducrotté P; Zerbib F; Denis P; Ponchon T; Thibault R; Galmiche JP Gut; 2005 Dec; 54(12):1682-6. PubMed ID: 15843417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of esophageal acid exposure at 1 cm and 6 cm above the squamocolumnar junction using the Bravo pH monitoring system. Pandolfino JE; Lee TJ; Schreiner MA; Zhang Q; Roth MP; Kahrilas PJ Dis Esophagus; 2006; 19(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 16722995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Day-to-day discrepancy in Bravo pH monitoring is related to the degree of deterioration of the lower esophageal sphincter and severity of reflux disease. Ayazi S; Hagen JA; Zehetner J; Banki F; Augustin F; Ayazi A; DeMeester SR; Oh DS; Sohn HJ; Lipham JC; DeMeester TR Surg Endosc; 2011 Jul; 25(7):2219-23. PubMed ID: 21359906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Acid reflux event detection using the Bravo wireless versus the Slimline catheter pH systems: why are the numbers so different? Pandolfino JE; Zhang Q; Schreiner MA; Ghosh S; Roth MP; Kahrilas PJ Gut; 2005 Dec; 54(12):1687-92. PubMed ID: 15923666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Bravo capsule placement in the gastric cardia: a novel method for analysis of proximal stomach acid environment. Pandolfino JE; Schreiner MA; Lee TJ; Zhang Q; Kahrilas PJ Am J Gastroenterol; 2005 Aug; 100(8):1721-7. PubMed ID: 16086707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]