These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16341578)

  • 1. Integrated MEG and fMRI model: synthesis and analysis.
    Babajani A; Nekooei MH; Soltanian-Zadeh H
    Brain Topogr; 2005; 18(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 16341578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Integrated MEG/EEG and fMRI model based on neural masses.
    Babajani A; Soltanian-Zadeh H
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Sep; 53(9):1794-801. PubMed ID: 16941835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An integrative MEG-fMRI study of the primary somatosensory cortex using cross-modal correspondence analysis.
    Schulz M; Chau W; Graham SJ; McIntosh AR; Ross B; Ishii R; Pantev C
    Neuroimage; 2004 May; 22(1):120-33. PubMed ID: 15110002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Geometrical interpretation of fMRI-guided MEG/EEG inverse estimates.
    Ahlfors SP; Simpson GV
    Neuroimage; 2004 May; 22(1):323-32. PubMed ID: 15110022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A technique to consider mismatches between fMRI and EEG/MEG sources for fMRI-constrained EEG/MEG source imaging: a preliminary simulation study.
    Im CH; Lee SY
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Dec; 51(23):6005-21. PubMed ID: 17110766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modeling both the magnitude and phase of complex-valued fMRI data.
    Rowe DB
    Neuroimage; 2005 May; 25(4):1310-24. PubMed ID: 15850748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A general linear model for MEG beamformer imaging.
    Brookes MJ; Gibson AM; Hall SD; Furlong PL; Barnes GR; Hillebrand A; Singh KD; Holliday IE; Francis ST; Morris PG
    Neuroimage; 2004 Nov; 23(3):936-46. PubMed ID: 15528094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multimodal integration of EEG, MEG and fMRI data for the solution of the neuroimage puzzle.
    Babiloni F; Mattia D; Babiloni C; Astolfi L; Salinari S; Basilisco A; Rossini PM; Marciani MG; Cincotti F
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Dec; 22(10):1471-6. PubMed ID: 15707796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using nonlinear models in fMRI data analysis: model selection and activation detection.
    Deneux T; Faugeras O
    Neuroimage; 2006 Oct; 32(4):1669-89. PubMed ID: 16844388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hierarchical Bayesian estimation for MEG inverse problem.
    Sato MA; Yoshioka T; Kajihara S; Toyama K; Goda N; Doya K; Kawato M
    Neuroimage; 2004 Nov; 23(3):806-26. PubMed ID: 15528082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Combining fMRI and MEG increases the reliability of presurgical language localization: a clinical study on the difference between and congruence of both modalities.
    Grummich P; Nimsky C; Pauli E; Buchfelder M; Ganslandt O
    Neuroimage; 2006 Oct; 32(4):1793-803. PubMed ID: 16889984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Studying the human somatosensory hand area: A new way to compare fMRI and MEG.
    Stoeckel MC; Pollok B; Schnitzler A; Seitz RJ
    J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Aug; 164(2):280-91. PubMed ID: 17597225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Partial least squares analysis of neuroimaging data: applications and advances.
    McIntosh AR; Lobaugh NJ
    Neuroimage; 2004; 23 Suppl 1():S250-63. PubMed ID: 15501095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. fMRI-vs-MEG evaluation of post-stroke interhemispheric asymmetries in primary sensorimotor hand areas.
    Altamura C; Torquati K; Zappasodi F; Ferretti A; Pizzella V; Tibuzzi F; Vernieri F; Pasqualetti P; Landi D; Del Gratta C; Romani GL; Maria Rossini P; Tecchio F
    Exp Neurol; 2007 Apr; 204(2):631-9. PubMed ID: 17291497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bayesian analysis of the neuromagnetic inverse problem with l(p)-norm priors.
    Auranen T; Nummenmaa A; Hämäläinen MS; Jääskeläinen IP; Lampinen J; Vehtari A; Sams M
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jul; 26(3):870-84. PubMed ID: 15955497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improving permutation test power for group analysis of spatially filtered MEG data.
    Chau W; McIntosh AR; Robinson SE; Schulz M; Pantev C
    Neuroimage; 2004 Nov; 23(3):983-96. PubMed ID: 15528099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multi-area neural mass modeling of EEG and MEG signals.
    Babajani-Feremi A; Soltanian-Zadeh H
    Neuroimage; 2010 Sep; 52(3):793-811. PubMed ID: 20080193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Application of artificial neural network to fMRI regression analysis.
    Misaki M; Miyauchi S
    Neuroimage; 2006 Jan; 29(2):396-408. PubMed ID: 16140549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Discussion on the choice of separated components in fMRI data analysis by spatial independent component analysis.
    Chen H; Yao D
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Jul; 22(6):827-33. PubMed ID: 15234451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Independent vector analysis (IVA): multivariate approach for fMRI group study.
    Lee JH; Lee TW; Jolesz FA; Yoo SS
    Neuroimage; 2008 Mar; 40(1):86-109. PubMed ID: 18165105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.