243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16342274)
1. Evaluating the quality of NMR structures by local density of protons.
Ban YE; Rudolph J; Zhou P; Edelsbrunner H
Proteins; 2006 Mar; 62(4):852-64. PubMed ID: 16342274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating protein structures determined by structural genomics consortia.
Bhattacharya A; Tejero R; Montelione GT
Proteins; 2007 Mar; 66(4):778-95. PubMed ID: 17186527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A large data set comparison of protein structures determined by crystallography and NMR: statistical test for structural differences and the effect of crystal packing.
Andrec M; Snyder DA; Zhou Z; Young J; Montelione GT; Levy RM
Proteins; 2007 Nov; 69(3):449-65. PubMed ID: 17623851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Refinement of NMR-determined protein structures with database derived mean-force potentials.
Wu D; Jernigan R; Wu Z
Proteins; 2007 Jul; 68(1):232-42. PubMed ID: 17387736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing protein structures with a non-local atomic interaction energy.
Melo F; Feytmans E
J Mol Biol; 1998 Apr; 277(5):1141-52. PubMed ID: 9571028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Application of 1H NMR chemical shifts to measure the quality of protein structures.
Williamson MP; Kikuchi J; Asakura T
J Mol Biol; 1995 Apr; 247(4):541-6. PubMed ID: 7723012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. TASSER-based refinement of NMR structures.
Lee SY; Zhang Y; Skolnick J
Proteins; 2006 May; 63(3):451-6. PubMed ID: 16456861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Contact area difference (CAD): a robust measure to evaluate accuracy of protein models.
Abagyan RA; Totrov MM
J Mol Biol; 1997 May; 268(3):678-85. PubMed ID: 9171291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The limit of accuracy of protein modeling: influence of crystal packing on protein structure.
Eyal E; Gerzon S; Potapov V; Edelman M; Sobolev V
J Mol Biol; 2005 Aug; 351(2):431-42. PubMed ID: 16005885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of X-ray and NMR structures: is there a systematic difference in residue contacts between X-ray- and NMR-resolved protein structures?
Garbuzynskiy SO; Melnik BS; Lobanov MY; Finkelstein AV; Galzitskaya OV
Proteins; 2005 Jul; 60(1):139-47. PubMed ID: 15856480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Difference density quality (DDQ): a method to assess the global and local correctness of macromolecular crystal structures.
van den Akker F; Hol WG
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr; 1999 Jan; 55(Pt 1):206-18. PubMed ID: 10089411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparisons of NMR spectral quality and success in crystallization demonstrate that NMR and X-ray crystallography are complementary methods for small protein structure determination.
Snyder DA; Chen Y; Denissova NG; Acton T; Aramini JM; Ciano M; Karlin R; Liu J; Manor P; Rajan PA; Rossi P; Swapna GV; Xiao R; Rost B; Hunt J; Montelione GT
J Am Chem Soc; 2005 Nov; 127(47):16505-11. PubMed ID: 16305237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Protein imperfections: separating intrinsic from extrinsic variation of torsion angles.
Butterfoss GL; Richardson JS; Hermans J
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr; 2005 Jan; 61(Pt 1):88-98. PubMed ID: 15608380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Application of distance geometry to the proton assignment problem.
Oshiro CM; Kuntz ID
Biopolymers; 1993 Jan; 33(1):107-15. PubMed ID: 8381306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Nuclear magnetic resonance-based modeling and refinement of protein three-dimensional structures and their complexes.
Fuentes G; van Dijk AD; Bonvin AM
Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 443():229-55. PubMed ID: 18446291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing atomistic simulation data with the NMR experiment: how much can NOEs actually tell us?
Zagrovic B; van Gunsteren WF
Proteins; 2006 Apr; 63(1):210-8. PubMed ID: 16425239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Powder crystallography by proton solid-state NMR spectroscopy.
Elena B; Emsley L
J Am Chem Soc; 2005 Jun; 127(25):9140-6. PubMed ID: 15969592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Combination of NMR spectroscopy and X-ray crystallography offers unique advantages for elucidation of the structural basis of protein complex assembly.
Feng W; Pan L; Zhang M
Sci China Life Sci; 2011 Feb; 54(2):101-11. PubMed ID: 21318479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An empirical backbone-backbone hydrogen-bonding potential in proteins and its applications to NMR structure refinement and validation.
Grishaev A; Bax A
J Am Chem Soc; 2004 Jun; 126(23):7281-92. PubMed ID: 15186165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. 3D structure determination of the Crh protein from highly ambiguous solid-state NMR restraints.
Loquet A; Bardiaux B; Gardiennet C; Blanchet C; Baldus M; Nilges M; Malliavin T; Böckmann A
J Am Chem Soc; 2008 Mar; 130(11):3579-89. PubMed ID: 18284240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
