These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1634242)

  • 1. Apparent size and distance in an imaging display.
    Meehan JW; Triggs TJ
    Hum Factors; 1992 Jun; 34(3):303-11. PubMed ID: 1634242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Apparent minification in an imaging display under reduced viewing conditions.
    Meehan JW
    Perception; 1993; 22(9):1075-84. PubMed ID: 8041590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Apparent relative size and depth of moving objects.
    Kaneko H; Uchikawa K
    Perception; 1993; 22(5):537-47. PubMed ID: 8414880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Emmert's law in the Ames room.
    Dwyer J; Ashton R; Broerse J
    Perception; 1990; 19(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 2336333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Examination of apparent extent as an explanation of the Poggendorff effect.
    Trueman MT; Wilson AE
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Jun; 45(6):494-500. PubMed ID: 2740190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The roles of convergence and apparent distance in depth constancy with motion parallax.
    Rivest J; Ono H; Saida S
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Nov; 46(5):401-8. PubMed ID: 2813024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relative distance judgments of familiar and unfamiliar objects viewed under representatively natural conditions.
    Predebon J
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Apr; 47(4):342-8. PubMed ID: 2345687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perceived size and perceived distance of targets viewed from between the legs: evidence for proprioceptive theory.
    Higashiyama A; Adachi K
    Vision Res; 2006 Nov; 46(23):3961-76. PubMed ID: 16979687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Observer movement and size constancy.
    Combe E; Wexler M
    Psychol Sci; 2010 May; 21(5):667-75. PubMed ID: 20483845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evidence for good recovery of lengths of real objects seen with natural stereo viewing.
    Frisby JP; Buckley D; Duke PA
    Perception; 1996; 25(2):129-54. PubMed ID: 8733143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The moon illusion: a test of the vestibular hypothesis under monocular viewing conditions.
    Carter DS
    Percept Mot Skills; 1977 Dec; 45(3 Pt 2):1127-30. PubMed ID: 305029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The interaction of oculomotor cues and stimulus size in stereoscopic death constancy.
    Collett TS; Schwarz U; Sobel EC
    Perception; 1991; 20(6):733-54. PubMed ID: 1816533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stereoscopic depth and the occlusion illusion.
    Palmer SE; Schloss KB
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jul; 71(5):1083-94. PubMed ID: 19525539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Did Ptolemy understand the moon illusion?
    Ross HE; Ross GM
    Perception; 1976; 5(4):377-85. PubMed ID: 794813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating the accuracy of size perception on screen-based displays: Displayed objects appear smaller than real objects.
    Stefanucci JK; Creem-Regehr SH; Thompson WB; Lessard DA; Geuss MN
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2015 Sep; 21(3):215-23. PubMed ID: 26121374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perceived relative distance depends on the size ratio of targets in photographs.
    Takezawa T
    Perception; 2013; 42(3):282-93. PubMed ID: 23837205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of size, clutter, and complexity on vanishing-point distances in visual imagery.
    Hubbard TL; Baird JC
    Psychol Res; 1993; 55(3):223-36. PubMed ID: 8416041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Vertical position as a cue to pictorial depth: height in the picture plane versus distance to the horizon.
    Gardner JS; Austerweil JL; Palmer SE
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):445-53. PubMed ID: 20139458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Through the looking glass: how the relationship between an object and its reflection affects the perception of distance and size.
    Jones LA; Bertamini M
    Perception; 2007; 36(11):1572-94. PubMed ID: 18265840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of familiar size on judgments of relative size and distance.
    Predebon J
    Percept Mot Skills; 1979 Jun; 48(3 Pt 2):1211-4. PubMed ID: 492892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.