These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16343562)

  • 1. Integrated zone comparison polygraph technique accuracy with scoring algorithms.
    Gordon NJ; Mohamed FB; Faro SH; Platek SM; Ahmad H; Williams JM
    Physiol Behav; 2006 Feb; 87(2):251-4. PubMed ID: 16343562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A field study on the validity of the Quadri-Track Zone Comparison Technique.
    Mangan DJ; Armitage TE; Adams GC
    Physiol Behav; 2008 Sep; 95(1-2):17-23; discussion 24-31. PubMed ID: 18436271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. New measures improve the accuracy of the directed-lie test when detecting deception using a mock crime.
    Bell BG; Kircher JC; Bernhardt PC
    Physiol Behav; 2008 Jun; 94(3):331-40. PubMed ID: 18343464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can simultaneously acquired electrodermal activity improve accuracy of fMRI detection of deception?
    Kozel FA; Johnson KA; Laken SJ; Grenesko EL; Smith JA; Walker J; George MS
    Soc Neurosci; 2009; 4(6):510-7. PubMed ID: 18633826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detection of deception using fMRI: better than chance, but well below perfection.
    Monteleone GT; Phan KL; Nusbaum HC; Fitzgerald D; Irick JS; Fienberg SE; Cacioppo JT
    Soc Neurosci; 2009; 4(6):528-38. PubMed ID: 18633832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The comparison question polygraph test: a contrast of methods and scoring.
    Honts CR; Reavy R
    Physiol Behav; 2015 May; 143():15-26. PubMed ID: 25703188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Functional MRI lie detection: too good to be true?
    Simpson JR
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2008; 36(4):491-8. PubMed ID: 19092066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Information gain of psychophysiological detection of deception in forensic and screening settings.
    Honts CR; Schweinle W
    Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback; 2009 Sep; 34(3):161-72. PubMed ID: 19609667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detecting deception from neuroimaging signals--a data-driven perspective.
    Haynes JD
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2008 Apr; 12(4):126-7; author reply 127-8. PubMed ID: 18308617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Countering countermeasures in the concealed information test using covert respiration measures.
    Elaad E; Ben-Shakhar G
    Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback; 2009 Sep; 34(3):197-208. PubMed ID: 19543828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tonic arousal during field polygraph tests in guilty vs. innocent suspects in Japan.
    Hira S; Furumitsu I
    Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback; 2009 Sep; 34(3):173-6. PubMed ID: 19499326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neuroscience, lie-detection, and the law: contrary to the prevailing view, the suitability of brain-based lie-detection for courtroom or forensic use should be determined according to legal and not scientific standards.
    Schauer F
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2010 Mar; 14(3):101-3. PubMed ID: 20060772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy rate of lie-detection in China: estimate the validity of CQT on field cases.
    Mao YY; Liang YD; Hu ZQ
    Physiol Behav; 2015 Mar; 140():104-10. PubMed ID: 25447427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Separating deceptive and orienting components in a Concealed Information Test.
    Ambach W; Stark R; Peper M; Vaitl D
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Nov; 70(2):95-104. PubMed ID: 18674573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Polygraph testing for deception in Australia: effective aid to crime investigation and adjudication?
    McMahon M
    J Law Med; 2003 Aug; 11(1):24-47. PubMed ID: 14526725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can bad science be good evidence? Neuroscience, lie detection, and beyond.
    Schauer F
    Cornell Law Rev; 2010 Sep; 95(6):1191-220. PubMed ID: 20939147
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stress and deception in speech: evaluating layered voice analysis.
    Harnsberger JD; Hollien H; Martin CA; Hollien KA
    J Forensic Sci; 2009 May; 54(3):642-50. PubMed ID: 19432740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Police lie detection accuracy: the effect of lie scenario.
    O'Sullivan M; Frank MG; Hurley CM; Tiwana J
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Dec; 33(6):530-8. PubMed ID: 19242785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantitative comparison of two cortical surface extraction methods using MRI phantoms.
    Eskildsen SF; Ostergaard LR
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2007; 10(Pt 1):409-16. PubMed ID: 18051085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Progress of Keystroke Dynamics in Deception Research.
    Nan TY
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Dec; 38(6):783-787. PubMed ID: 36914395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.