These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16344022)

  • 1. The validity of prospective and retrospective global change criterion measures.
    Schmitt J; Di Fabio RP
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2005 Dec; 86(12):2270-6. PubMed ID: 16344022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Testing minimal clinically important difference: consensus or conundrum?
    Gatchel RJ; Mayer TG
    Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):321-7. PubMed ID: 20362248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliable change and minimum important difference (MID) proportions facilitated group responsiveness comparisons using individual threshold criteria.
    Schmitt JS; Di Fabio RP
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Oct; 57(10):1008-18. PubMed ID: 15528051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is the disability of arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire (DASH) also valid and responsive in patients with neck complaints.
    Huisstede BM; Feleus A; Bierma-Zeinstra SM; Verhaar JA; Koes BW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Feb; 34(4):E130-8. PubMed ID: 19182703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.
    Haro H; Maekawa S; Hamada Y
    Spine J; 2008; 8(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 17433781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance-based or self-report measures of physical function: which should be used in clinical trials of hip fracture patients?
    Latham NK; Mehta V; Nguyen AM; Jette AM; Olarsch S; Papanicolaou D; Chandler J
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 Nov; 89(11):2146-55. PubMed ID: 18996244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. DASH questionnaire for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms in industry workers: a validity and reliability study.
    Kitis A; Celik E; Aslan UB; Zencir M
    Appl Ergon; 2009 Mar; 40(2):251-5. PubMed ID: 18555973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Moss Attention Rating Scale for traumatic brain injury: further explorations of reliability and sensitivity to change.
    Whyte J; Hart T; Ellis CA; Chervoneva I
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 May; 89(5):966-73. PubMed ID: 18452747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Patient-Specific Functional Scale: validity in workers' compensation claimants.
    Gross DP; Battié MC; Asante AK
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 Jul; 89(7):1294-9. PubMed ID: 18534550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimum important differences for the patient-specific functional scale, 4 region-specific outcome measures, and the numeric pain rating scale.
    Abbott JH; Schmitt J
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2014 Aug; 44(8):560-4. PubMed ID: 24828475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Upper Limb Functional Index: development and determination of reliability, validity, and responsiveness.
    Gabel CP; Michener LA; Burkett B; Neller A
    J Hand Ther; 2006; 19(3):328-48; quiz 349. PubMed ID: 16861132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spanish-language version of the MedRisk Instrument for Measuring Patient Satisfaction With Physical Therapy Care (MRPS): preliminary validation.
    Beattie PF; Nelson RM; Lis A
    Phys Ther; 2007 Jun; 87(6):793-800. PubMed ID: 17442835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The course of nonspecific work-related upper limb disorders and the influence of demographic factors, psychologic factors, and physical fitness on clinical status and disability.
    van Eijsden-Besseling MD; van den Bergh KA; Staal JB; de Bie RA; van den Heuvel WJ
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2010 Jun; 91(6):862-7. PubMed ID: 20510975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Psychometric properties of the Neck Disability Index and Numeric Pain Rating Scale in patients with mechanical neck pain.
    Cleland JA; Childs JD; Whitman JM
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 Jan; 89(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 18164333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A prospective global measure, the Punum Ladder, provides more valid assessments of quality of life than a retrospective transition measure.
    Fletcher KE; French CT; Irwin RS; Corapi KM; Norman GR
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Oct; 63(10):1123-31. PubMed ID: 20303709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measuring the outcome of health resort programs.
    Weigl M; Ewert T; Kleinschmidt J; Stucki G
    J Rheumatol; 2006 Apr; 33(4):764-70. PubMed ID: 16583479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of four shoulder-specific questionnaires in primary care.
    Paul A; Lewis M; Shadforth MF; Croft PR; Van Der Windt DA; Hay EM
    Ann Rheum Dis; 2004 Oct; 63(10):1293-9. PubMed ID: 15361390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Associations between treatment processes, patient characteristics, and outcomes in outpatient physical therapy practice.
    Deutscher D; Horn SD; Dickstein R; Hart DL; Smout RJ; Gutvirtz M; Ariel I
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2009 Aug; 90(8):1349-63. PubMed ID: 19651269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The patient-specific functional scale: validity, reliability, and responsiveness in patients with upper extremity musculoskeletal problems.
    Hefford C; Abbott JH; Arnold R; Baxter GD
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2012 Feb; 42(2):56-65. PubMed ID: 22333510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical interpretation of a lower-extremity functional scale-derived computerized adaptive test.
    Wang YC; Hart DL; Stratford PW; Mioduski JE
    Phys Ther; 2009 Sep; 89(9):957-68. PubMed ID: 19628577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.