175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1634407)
1. Yield grade and carcass weight effects on the cutability of lamb carcasses fabricated into innovative style subprimals.
Garrett RP; Savell JW; Cross HR; Johnson HK
J Anim Sci; 1992 Jun; 70(6):1829-39. PubMed ID: 1634407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Beef carcass composition of slaughter cattle differing in frame size, muscle score, and external fatness.
May SG; Mies WL; Edwards JW; Williams FL; Wise JW; Morgan JB; Savell JW; Cross HR
J Anim Sci; 1992 Aug; 70(8):2431-45. PubMed ID: 1506305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Carcass traits, cut yields, and compositional end points in high-lean-yielding pork carcasses: effects of 10th rib backfat and loin eye area.
Pringle TD; Williams SE
J Anim Sci; 2001 Jan; 79(1):115-21. PubMed ID: 11204691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Retail cut yields of Rambouillet wether lambs fed the beta-adrenergic agonist L644,969.
Shackelford SD; Edwards JW; Smarr EK; Savell JW
J Anim Sci; 1992 Jan; 70(1):161-8. PubMed ID: 1349884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Using current on-line carcass evaluation parameters to estimate boneless and bone-in pork carcass yield as influenced by trim level.
Berg EP; Grams DW; Miller RK; Wise JW; Forrest JC; Savell JW
J Anim Sci; 1999 Aug; 77(8):1977-84. PubMed ID: 10461971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimates of subprimal yields from beef carcasses as affected by USDA grades, subcutaneous fat trim level, and carcass sex class and type.
Griffin DB; Savell JW; Morgan JB; Garrett RP; Cross HR
J Anim Sci; 1992 Aug; 70(8):2411-30. PubMed ID: 1506304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the Hennessy grading probe to predict yields of lamb carcasses fabricated to multiple end points.
Garrett RP; Edwards JW; Savell JW; Tatum JD
J Anim Sci; 1992 Apr; 70(4):1146-52. PubMed ID: 1582945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of sex-class, USDA yield grade and USDA quality grade on seam fat trim from the primals of beef carcasses.
Jones DK; Savell JW; Cross HR
J Anim Sci; 1990 Jul; 68(7):1987-91. PubMed ID: 2384389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of frame size, muscle score, and external fatness on live and carcass value of beef cattle.
May SG; Mies WL; Edwards JW; Williams FL; Wise JW; Harris JJ; Savell JW; Cross HR
J Anim Sci; 1992 Nov; 70(11):3311-6. PubMed ID: 1459891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of live and carcass equations predicting percentage of cutability, retail product weight, and trimmable fat in beef cattle.
Herring WO; Williams SE; Bertrand JK; Benyshek LL; Miller DC
J Anim Sci; 1994 May; 72(5):1107-18. PubMed ID: 8056655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relationship of visual assessments of feeder lamb muscularity to differences in carcass yield traits.
Tatum JD; Samber JA; Gillmore BR; LeValley SB; Williams FL
J Anim Sci; 1998 Mar; 76(3):774-80. PubMed ID: 9535337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of body condition score on carcass characteristics and subprimal yield from cull beef cows.
Apple JK; Davis JC; Stephenson J; Hankins JE; Davis JR; Beaty SL
J Anim Sci; 1999 Oct; 77(10):2660-9. PubMed ID: 10521025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relative contributions of subcutaneous and intermuscular fat to yields and predictability of retail product, fat trim, and bone in beef carcasses.
Dikeman ME; Cundiff LV; Gregory KE; Kemp KE; Koch RM
J Anim Sci; 1998 Jun; 76(6):1604-12. PubMed ID: 9655580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dual-component video image analysis system (VIASCAN) as a predictor of beef carcass red meat yield percentage and for augmenting application of USDA yield grades.
Cannell RC; Tatum JD; Belk KE; Wise JW; Clayton RP; Smith GC
J Anim Sci; 1999 Nov; 77(11):2942-50. PubMed ID: 10568462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of hot-fat trimming on factors associated with the subprimal yield of beef carcasses.
Ahmed PO; Miller MF; Shackelford SD; Johnson LP; Williams SE; McCann MA; Reagan JO
J Anim Sci; 1992 Feb; 70(2):439-43. PubMed ID: 1548206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gluteus medius and rump fat depths as additional live animal ultrasound measurements for predicting retail product and trimmable fat in beef carcasses.
Realini CE; Williams RE; Pringle TD; Bertrand JK
J Anim Sci; 2001 Jun; 79(6):1378-85. PubMed ID: 11424672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Phenotypic characterization of Rambouillet sheep expressing the callipyge gene: II. Carcass characteristics and retail yield.
Jackson SP; Miller MF; Green RD
J Anim Sci; 1997 Jan; 75(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 9027557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An evaluation of the lamb vision system as a predictor of lamb carcass red meat yield percentage.
Brady AS; Belk KE; LeValley SB; Dalsted NL; Scanga JA; Tatum JD; Smith GC
J Anim Sci; 2003 Jun; 81(6):1488-98. PubMed ID: 12817497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of wholesale lamb marketing options and merchandising styles on retail yield and fabrication time.
Lorenzen CL; Martin AM; Griffin DB; Dockerty TR; Walter JP; Johnson HK; Savell JW
J Anim Sci; 1997 Jan; 75(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 9027541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Live and carcass values from different cattle types.
Mies WL; Harris JJ; Knapp RH; Edwards JW; Terry CA; Savell JW; Cross HR
J Anim Sci; 1992 May; 70(5):1314-25. PubMed ID: 1526899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
