BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16344278)

  • 1. A randomised cross-over trial comparing patient preference for oral capecitabine and 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin regimens in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.
    Twelves C; Gollins S; Grieve R; Samuel L
    Ann Oncol; 2006 Feb; 17(2):239-45. PubMed ID: 16344278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing the effectiveness of capecitabine versus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin therapy for elderly Taiwanese stage III colorectal cancer patients based on quality-of-life measures (QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR38) and a new cost assessment tool.
    Lin JK; Tan EC; Yang MC
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2015 May; 13():61. PubMed ID: 25986478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The clinical and economic benefits of capecitabine and tegafur with uracil in metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Ward SE; Kaltenthaler E; Cowan J; Marples M; Orr B; Seymour MT
    Br J Cancer; 2006 Jul; 95(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 16804526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detailed analysis of metastatic colorectal cancer patients who developed cardiotoxicity on another fluoropyrimidine and switched to S-1 treatment (subgroup analysis of the CardioSwitch-study).
    Kinos S; Hagman H; Halonen P; Soveri LM; O'Reilly M; Pfeiffer P; Frödin JE; Sorbye H; Heervä E; Liposits G; Kallio R; Ålgars A; Ristamäki R; Salminen T; Bärlund M; Shah CH; McDermott R; Röckert R; Flygare P; Kwakman J; Teske A; Punt C; Glimelius B; Österlund P
    Acta Oncol; 2024 May; 63():248-258. PubMed ID: 38698698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The clinical and economic benefits of capecitabine and tegafur with uracil in metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Almond J; Ralston S
    Br J Cancer; 2007 May; 96(9):1489; author reply 1490. PubMed ID: 17437019
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A pilot study: dose adaptation of capecitabine using mobile phone toxicity monitoring - supporting patients in their homes.
    Weaver A; Love SB; Larsen M; Shanyinde M; Waters R; Grainger L; Shearwood V; Brooks C; Gibson O; Young AM; Tarassenko L
    Support Care Cancer; 2014 Oct; 22(10):2677-85. PubMed ID: 24771299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Compliance, satisfaction, and quality of life of patients with colorectal cancer receiving home chemotherapy or outpatient treatment: a randomised controlled trial.
    Borras JM; Sanchez-Hernandez A; Navarro M; Martinez M; Mendez E; Ponton JL; Espinas JA; Germa JR
    BMJ; 2001 Apr; 322(7290):826. PubMed ID: 11290635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Inappropriate continuation of medication when patients are admitted acutely: the example of capecitabine.
    Booth JA; Booth C; Crawford SM
    Clin Med (Lond); 2011 Oct; 11(5):511. PubMed ID: 22034726
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A pilot study investigating plasma pharmacokinetics and tolerance of oral capecitabine in carcinoma-bearing dogs.
    Wetzel S; Fidel J; Whittington D; Villarino NF
    BMC Vet Res; 2024 Jan; 20(1):36. PubMed ID: 38297307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A valid formulation of the analysis of noninferiority trials under random effects meta-analysis.
    Brittain EH; Fay MP; Follmann DA
    Biostatistics; 2012 Sep; 13(4):637-49. PubMed ID: 22467938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of patients' knowledge of their treatment with capecitabine at the National Institute of Oncology in Rabat.
    Nouibi C; Cherif Chefchaouni A; Bechar H; Belahcen MJ; Rahali Y
    J Oncol Pharm Pract; 2023 Oct; 29(7):1708-1714. PubMed ID: 36637236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Deprived social status is associated with decreased use of oral chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: A retrospective cohort study on administrative databases in a French University Hospital.
    Gautier G; Lucas M; Vermeulin T; Di Fiore F; Merle V
    Pharmacol Res Perspect; 2021 Dec; 9(6):e00888. PubMed ID: 34766736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Response to letter entitled: Re: Toxicities associated with chemotherapy regimens containing a fluoropyrimidine: A real-life evaluation in France.
    Hill C
    Eur J Cancer; 2023 Aug; 189():112929. PubMed ID: 37327685
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Oral Chemotherapy for Treatment of Lung Cancer.
    Jonna S; Reuss JE; Kim C; Liu SV
    Front Oncol; 2020; 10():793. PubMed ID: 32426292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Oral versus intravenous fluoropyrimidines for colorectal cancer.
    Chionh F; Lau D; Yeung Y; Price T; Tebbutt N
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Jul; 7(7):CD008398. PubMed ID: 28752564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Xeloda in Adjuvant Colon Cancer Therapy (X-ACT) trial: overview of efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness.
    Twelves CJ
    Clin Colorectal Cancer; 2006 Nov; 6(4):278-87. PubMed ID: 17241512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Patient preferences for oral versus intravenous palliative chemotherapy.
    Liu G; Franssen E; Fitch MI; Warner E
    J Clin Oncol; 1997 Jan; 15(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 8996131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patient preference for oral or intravenous chemotherapy: a randomised cross-over trial comparing capecitabine and Nordic fluorouracil/leucovorin in patients with colorectal cancer.
    Pfeiffer P; Mortensen JP; Bjerregaard B; Eckhoff L; Schønnemann K; Sandberg E; Aabo K; Jakobsen A
    Eur J Cancer; 2006 Nov; 42(16):2738-43. PubMed ID: 17011184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of clinical and translational research on the quality of life during the metastatic colorectal cancer patient journey.
    Rodriguez Castells M; Baraibar I; Ros J; Saoudi N; Salvà F; García A; Alcaraz A; Tabernero J; Élez E
    Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1272561. PubMed ID: 37909013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Overcoming barriers to patient adherence: the case for developing innovative drug delivery systems.
    Baryakova TH; Pogostin BH; Langer R; McHugh KJ
    Nat Rev Drug Discov; 2023 May; 22(5):387-409. PubMed ID: 36973491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.