1143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16344291)
1. Manikin-based performance evaluation of N95 filtering-facepiece respirators challenged with nanoparticles.
Balazy A; Toivola M; Reponen T; Podgórski A; Zimmer A; Grinshpun SA
Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Apr; 50(3):259-69. PubMed ID: 16344291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Nanoparticle penetration through filter media and leakage through face seal interface of N95 filtering facepiece respirators.
Rengasamy S; Eimer BC
Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Jul; 56(5):568-80. PubMed ID: 22294504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of nanoparticle filtration performance of NIOSH-approved and CE-marked particulate filtering facepiece respirators.
Rengasamy S; Eimer BC; Shaffer RE
Ann Occup Hyg; 2009 Mar; 53(2):117-28. PubMed ID: 19261695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the filtration performance of NIOSH-approved N95 filtering facepiece respirators by photometric and number-based test methods.
Rengasamy S; Miller A; Eimer BC
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2011 Jan; 8(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 21154105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Filtration performance of NIOSH-approved N95 and P100 filtering facepiece respirators against 4 to 30 nanometer-size nanoparticles.
Rengasamy S; King WP; Eimer BC; Shaffer RE
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Sep; 5(9):556-64. PubMed ID: 18607812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Total inward leakage of nanoparticles through filtering facepiece respirators.
Rengasamy S; Eimer BC
Ann Occup Hyg; 2011 Apr; 55(3):253-63. PubMed ID: 21292731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of performance of three different types of respiratory protection devices.
Lawrence RB; Duling MG; Calvert CA; Coffey CC
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2006 Sep; 3(9):465-74. PubMed ID: 16857645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Nanoparticle filtration performance of filtering facepiece respirators and canister/cartridge filters.
Rengasamy S; BerryAnn R; Szalajda J
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2013; 10(9):519-25. PubMed ID: 23927008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Laboratory and field evaluation of a new personal sampling system for assessing the protection provided by the N95 filtering facepiece respirators against particles.
Lee SA; Grinshpun SA; Adhikari A; Li W; McKay R; Maynard A; Reponen T
Ann Occup Hyg; 2005 Apr; 49(3):245-57. PubMed ID: 15668259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of pressure drop and filtration efficiency of particulate respirators using welding fumes and sodium chloride.
Cho HW; Yoon CS; Lee JH; Lee SJ; Viner A; Johnson EW
Ann Occup Hyg; 2011 Jul; 55(6):666-80. PubMed ID: 21742627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Field Evaluation of N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirators on Construction Jobsites for Protection against Airborne Ultrafine Particles.
Adhikari A; Mitra A; Rashidi A; Ekpo I; Schwartz J; Doehling J
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Sep; 15(9):. PubMed ID: 30205526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance of N95 FFRs Against Combustion and NaCl Aerosols in Dry and Moderately Humid Air: Manikin-based Study.
Gao S; Kim J; Yermakov M; Elmashae Y; He X; Reponen T; Zhuang Z; Rengasamy S; Grinshpun SA
Ann Occup Hyg; 2016 Jul; 60(6):748-60. PubMed ID: 27094179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Do N95 respirators provide 95% protection level against airborne viruses, and how adequate are surgical masks?
Bałazy A; Toivola M; Adhikari A; Sivasubramani SK; Reponen T; Grinshpun SA
Am J Infect Control; 2006 Mar; 34(2):51-7. PubMed ID: 16490606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A quantitative assessment of the total inward leakage of NaCl aerosol representing submicron-size bioaerosol through N95 filtering facepiece respirators and surgical masks.
Rengasamy S; Eimer BC; Szalajda J
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2014; 11(6):388-96. PubMed ID: 24275016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. N95 and p100 respirator filter efficiency under high constant and cyclic flow.
Eshbaugh JP; Gardner PD; Richardson AW; Hofacre KC
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2009 Jan; 6(1):52-61. PubMed ID: 19012163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the performance of the N95-companion: effects of filter penetration and comparison with other aerosol instruments.
Rengasamy S; Eimer BC; Shaffer RE
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2012; 9(7):417-26. PubMed ID: 22642759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Simulated workplace protection factors for half-facepiece respiratory protective devices.
Duling MG; Lawrence RB; Slaven JE; Coffey CC
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Jun; 4(6):420-31. PubMed ID: 17474032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Total inward leakage measurement of particulates for N95 filtering facepiece respirators--a comparison study.
Rengasamy S; Walbert GF; Newcomb WE; Faulkner K; Rengasamy MM; Brannen JJ; Szalajda JV
Ann Occup Hyg; 2014 Mar; 58(2):206-16. PubMed ID: 24107745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nanoparticle filtration performance of NIOSH-certified particulate air-purifying filtering facepiece respirators: evaluation by light scattering photometric and particle number-based test methods.
Rengasamy S; Eimer BC
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2012; 9(2):99-109. PubMed ID: 22239104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vivo protective performance of N95 respirator and surgical facemask.
Li Y; Wong T; Chung J; Guo YP; Hu JY; Guan YT; Yao L; Song QW; Newton E
Am J Ind Med; 2006 Dec; 49(12):1056-65. PubMed ID: 17096360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
