292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16345029)
1. Measuring and estimating diagnostic accuracy when there are three ordinal diagnostic groups.
Xiong C; van Belle G; Miller JP; Morris JC
Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1251-73. PubMed ID: 16345029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A parametric comparison of diagnostic accuracy with three ordinal diagnostic groups.
Xiong C; van Belle G; Miller JP; Yan Y; Gao F; Yu K; Morris JC
Biom J; 2007 Aug; 49(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17763377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. On the exact interval estimation for the difference in paired areas under the ROC curves.
Li CR; Liao CT; Liu JP
Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(2):224-42. PubMed ID: 17139702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Tests of equivalence and non-inferiority for diagnostic accuracy based on the paired areas under ROC curves.
Liu JP; Ma MC; Wu CY; Tai JY
Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1219-38. PubMed ID: 16158400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Combining dependent tests to compare the diagnostic accuracies--a non-parametric approach.
Yang Y; Jin Z
Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1239-50. PubMed ID: 16158406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Combining correlated diagnostic tests: application to neuropathologic diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease.
Xiong C; McKeel DW; Miller JP; Morris JC
Med Decis Making; 2004; 24(6):659-69. PubMed ID: 15534346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An ROC-type measure of diagnostic accuracy when the gold standard is continuous-scale.
Obuchowski NA
Stat Med; 2006 Feb; 25(3):481-93. PubMed ID: 16287217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A non-inferiority test for diagnostic accuracy based on the paired partial areas under ROC curves.
Li CR; Liao CT; Liu JP
Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(10):1762-76. PubMed ID: 17968858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Inverse probability weighting estimation of the volume under the ROC surface in the presence of verification bias.
Zhang Y; Alonzo TA;
Biom J; 2016 Nov; 58(6):1338-1356. PubMed ID: 27338713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bayesian bootstrap estimation of ROC curve.
Gu J; Ghosal S; Roy A
Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(26):5407-20. PubMed ID: 18613217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nonparametric estimation of ROC curves in the absence of a gold standard.
Zhou XH; Castelluccio P; Zhou C
Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):600-9. PubMed ID: 16011710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic thresholds with three ordinal groups.
Attwood K; Tian L; Xiong C
J Biopharm Stat; 2014; 24(3):608-33. PubMed ID: 24707966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Estimating diagnostic accuracy for clustered ordinal diagnostic groups in the three-class case-Application to the early diagnosis of Alzheimer disease.
Xiong C; Luo J; Chen L; Gao F; Liu J; Wang G; Bateman R; Morris JC
Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Mar; 27(3):701-714. PubMed ID: 29182052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of confidence/credible interval methods for the area under the ROC curve for continuous diagnostic tests with small sample size.
Feng D; Cortese G; Baumgartner R
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Dec; 26(6):2603-2621. PubMed ID: 26323286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sample size estimation in diagnostic test studies of biomedical informatics.
Hajian-Tilaki K
J Biomed Inform; 2014 Apr; 48():193-204. PubMed ID: 24582925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing the likelihood ratios of two binary diagnostic tests in the presence of partial verification.
Roldán Nofuentes JA; Luna del Castillo JD
Biom J; 2005 Aug; 47(4):442-57. PubMed ID: 16161803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimation of the volume under the receiver-operating characteristic surface adjusting for non-ignorable verification bias.
Zhang Y; Alonzo TA;
Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Mar; 27(3):715-739. PubMed ID: 29338546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adjustment for measurement error in evaluating diagnostic biomarkers by using an internal reliability sample.
White MT; Xie SX
Stat Med; 2013 Nov; 32(27):4709-25. PubMed ID: 23765915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Confidence Interval Estimation for Sensitivity to the Early Diseased Stage Based on Empirical Likelihood.
Dong T; Tian L
J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(6):1215-33. PubMed ID: 25372999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Confidence intervals for the difference in paired Youden indices.
Zhou H; Qin G
Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 23090764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
