BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16345029)

  • 1. Measuring and estimating diagnostic accuracy when there are three ordinal diagnostic groups.
    Xiong C; van Belle G; Miller JP; Morris JC
    Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1251-73. PubMed ID: 16345029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A parametric comparison of diagnostic accuracy with three ordinal diagnostic groups.
    Xiong C; van Belle G; Miller JP; Yan Y; Gao F; Yu K; Morris JC
    Biom J; 2007 Aug; 49(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17763377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the exact interval estimation for the difference in paired areas under the ROC curves.
    Li CR; Liao CT; Liu JP
    Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(2):224-42. PubMed ID: 17139702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tests of equivalence and non-inferiority for diagnostic accuracy based on the paired areas under ROC curves.
    Liu JP; Ma MC; Wu CY; Tai JY
    Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1219-38. PubMed ID: 16158400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Combining dependent tests to compare the diagnostic accuracies--a non-parametric approach.
    Yang Y; Jin Z
    Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1239-50. PubMed ID: 16158406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Combining correlated diagnostic tests: application to neuropathologic diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease.
    Xiong C; McKeel DW; Miller JP; Morris JC
    Med Decis Making; 2004; 24(6):659-69. PubMed ID: 15534346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An ROC-type measure of diagnostic accuracy when the gold standard is continuous-scale.
    Obuchowski NA
    Stat Med; 2006 Feb; 25(3):481-93. PubMed ID: 16287217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A non-inferiority test for diagnostic accuracy based on the paired partial areas under ROC curves.
    Li CR; Liao CT; Liu JP
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(10):1762-76. PubMed ID: 17968858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inverse probability weighting estimation of the volume under the ROC surface in the presence of verification bias.
    Zhang Y; Alonzo TA;
    Biom J; 2016 Nov; 58(6):1338-1356. PubMed ID: 27338713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bayesian bootstrap estimation of ROC curve.
    Gu J; Ghosal S; Roy A
    Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(26):5407-20. PubMed ID: 18613217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nonparametric estimation of ROC curves in the absence of a gold standard.
    Zhou XH; Castelluccio P; Zhou C
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):600-9. PubMed ID: 16011710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnostic thresholds with three ordinal groups.
    Attwood K; Tian L; Xiong C
    J Biopharm Stat; 2014; 24(3):608-33. PubMed ID: 24707966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimating diagnostic accuracy for clustered ordinal diagnostic groups in the three-class case-Application to the early diagnosis of Alzheimer disease.
    Xiong C; Luo J; Chen L; Gao F; Liu J; Wang G; Bateman R; Morris JC
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Mar; 27(3):701-714. PubMed ID: 29182052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of confidence/credible interval methods for the area under the ROC curve for continuous diagnostic tests with small sample size.
    Feng D; Cortese G; Baumgartner R
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Dec; 26(6):2603-2621. PubMed ID: 26323286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sample size estimation in diagnostic test studies of biomedical informatics.
    Hajian-Tilaki K
    J Biomed Inform; 2014 Apr; 48():193-204. PubMed ID: 24582925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing the likelihood ratios of two binary diagnostic tests in the presence of partial verification.
    Roldán Nofuentes JA; Luna del Castillo JD
    Biom J; 2005 Aug; 47(4):442-57. PubMed ID: 16161803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimation of the volume under the receiver-operating characteristic surface adjusting for non-ignorable verification bias.
    Zhang Y; Alonzo TA;
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Mar; 27(3):715-739. PubMed ID: 29338546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adjustment for measurement error in evaluating diagnostic biomarkers by using an internal reliability sample.
    White MT; Xie SX
    Stat Med; 2013 Nov; 32(27):4709-25. PubMed ID: 23765915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Confidence intervals for the difference in paired Youden indices.
    Zhou H; Qin G
    Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 23090764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. New nonparametric confidence intervals for the Youden index.
    Zhou H; Qin G
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(6):1244-57. PubMed ID: 23075020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.