290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16345029)
21. Diagnostic accuracy measures.
Eusebi P
Cerebrovasc Dis; 2013; 36(4):267-72. PubMed ID: 24135733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Profile-likelihood inference for highly accurate diagnostic tests.
Tsimikas JV; Bosch RJ; Coull BA; El Barmi H
Biometrics; 2002 Dec; 58(4):946-56. PubMed ID: 12495149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Empirical likelihood inference for the area under the ROC curve.
Qin G; Zhou XH
Biometrics; 2006 Jun; 62(2):613-22. PubMed ID: 16918927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A family of estimators to diagnostic accuracy when candidate tests are subject to detection limits-Application to diagnosing early stage Alzheimer disease.
Xiong C; Luo J; Agboola F; Grant E; Morris JC
Stat Methods Med Res; 2022 May; 31(5):882-898. PubMed ID: 35044258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Statistical methods for the meta-analysis of diagnostic tests must take into account the use of surrogate standards.
Kang J; Brant R; Ghali WA
J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 May; 66(5):566-574.e1. PubMed ID: 23466018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Using confidence intervals to compare several correlated areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves.
Zou GY; Yue L
Stat Med; 2013 Dec; 32(29):5077-90. PubMed ID: 23824874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of non-parametric confidence intervals for the area under the ROC curve of a continuous-scale diagnostic test.
Gengsheng Qin ; Hotilovac L
Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Apr; 17(2):207-21. PubMed ID: 18426855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Accurate likelihood inference for the volume under the ROC surface.
Ruli E; Ventura L
Cancer Rep (Hoboken); 2020 Aug; 3(4):e1206. PubMed ID: 32794638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Improved confidence intervals for the sensitivity at a fixed level of specificity of a continuous-scale diagnostic test.
Zhou XH; Qin G
Stat Med; 2005 Feb; 24(3):465-77. PubMed ID: 15635678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Semi-parametric estimation of the binormal ROC curve for a continuous diagnostic test.
Cai T; Moskowitz CS
Biostatistics; 2004 Oct; 5(4):573-86. PubMed ID: 15475420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Linear combinations of biomarkers to improve diagnostic accuracy with three ordinal diagnostic categories.
Kang L; Xiong C; Crane P; Tian L
Stat Med; 2013 Feb; 32(4):631-43. PubMed ID: 22865796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Random effects modeling approaches for estimating ROC curves from repeated ordinal tests without a gold standard.
Albert PS
Biometrics; 2007 Jun; 63(2):593-602. PubMed ID: 17688512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Estimating confidence intervals for the difference in diagnostic accuracy with three ordinal diagnostic categories without a gold standard.
Kang L; Xiong C; Tian L
Comput Stat Data Anal; 2013 Dec; 68():. PubMed ID: 24415817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Estimating negative likelihood ratio confidence when test sensitivity is 100%: A bootstrapping approach.
Marill KA; Chang Y; Wong KF; Friedman AB
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Aug; 26(4):1936-1948. PubMed ID: 26152746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Measures of accuracy and performance of diagnostic tests.
Drobatz KJ
J Vet Cardiol; 2009 May; 11 Suppl 1():S33-40. PubMed ID: 19451045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Weighted volume under the three-way receiver operating characteristic surface.
Huang L; Li J
Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Dec; 28(12):3627-3648. PubMed ID: 30453845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Jackknife empirical likelihood confidence regions for the evaluation of continuous-scale diagnostic tests with verification bias.
Wang B; Qin G
Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Oct; 25(5):2120-2137. PubMed ID: 24368764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Parametric three-way receiver operating characteristic surface analysis using mathematica.
Heckerling PS
Med Decis Making; 2001; 21(5):409-17. PubMed ID: 11575490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The partial area under the summary ROC curve.
Walter SD
Stat Med; 2005 Jul; 24(13):2025-40. PubMed ID: 15900606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Alternative Confidence Interval Methods Used in the Diagnostic Accuracy Studies.
Erdoğan S; Gülhan OT
Comput Math Methods Med; 2016; 2016():7141050. PubMed ID: 27478491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
