These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16345035)

  • 1. Bias reduction in effectiveness analyses of longitudinal ordinal doses with a mixed-effects propensity adjustment.
    Leon AC; Hedeker D; Teres JJ
    Stat Med; 2007 Jan; 26(1):110-23. PubMed ID: 16345035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A mixed-effects quintile-stratified propensity adjustment for effectiveness analyses of ordered categorical doses.
    Leon AC; Hedeker D
    Stat Med; 2005 Feb; 24(4):647-58. PubMed ID: 15678413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of mixed-effects quantile stratification propensity adjustment strategies for longitudinal treatment effectiveness analyses of continuous outcomes.
    Leon AC; Hedeker D
    Stat Med; 2007 Jun; 26(13):2650-65. PubMed ID: 17094068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Conditioning on the propensity score can result in biased estimation of common measures of treatment effect: a Monte Carlo study.
    Austin PC; Grootendorst P; Normand SL; Anderson GM
    Stat Med; 2007 Feb; 26(4):754-68. PubMed ID: 16783757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Longitudinal and repeated cross-sectional cluster-randomization designs using mixed effects regression for binary outcomes: bias and coverage of frequentist and Bayesian methods.
    Localio AR; Berlin JA; Have TR
    Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(16):2720-36. PubMed ID: 16345043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A dynamic adaptation of the propensity score adjustment for effectiveness analyses of ordinal doses of treatment.
    Leon AC; Mueller TI; Solomon DA; Keller MB
    Stat Med; 2001 May 15-30; 20(9-10):1487-98. PubMed ID: 11343369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does early improvement triggered by antidepressants predict response/remission? Analysis of data from a naturalistic study on a large sample of inpatients with major depression.
    Henkel V; Seemüller F; Obermeier M; Adli M; Bauer M; Mundt C; Brieger P; Laux G; Bender W; Heuser I; Zeiler J; Gaebel W; Mayr A; Möller HJ; Riedel M
    J Affect Disord; 2009 Jun; 115(3):439-49. PubMed ID: 19027961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal odds ratios.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2007 Jul; 26(16):3078-94. PubMed ID: 17187347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimators and confidence intervals for the marginal odds ratio using logistic regression and propensity score stratification.
    Stampf S; Graf E; Schmoor C; Schumacher M
    Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):760-9. PubMed ID: 20213703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The type I error and power of non-parametric logrank and Wilcoxon tests with adjustment for covariates--a simulation study.
    Jiang H; Symanowski J; Paul S; Qu Y; Zagar A; Hong S
    Stat Med; 2008 Dec; 27(28):5850-60. PubMed ID: 18759373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Duration of antidepressant drug treatment and its influence on risk of relapse/recurrence: immortal and neglected time bias.
    Gardarsdottir H; Egberts TC; Stolker JJ; Heerdink ER
    Am J Epidemiol; 2009 Aug; 170(3):280-5. PubMed ID: 19498074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using propensity scores subclassification to estimate effects of longitudinal treatments: an example using a new diabetes medication.
    Segal JB; Griswold M; Achy-Brou A; Herbert R; Bass EB; Dy SM; Millman AE; Wu AW; Frangakis CE
    Med Care; 2007 Oct; 45(10 Supl 2):S149-57. PubMed ID: 17909374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Test for interaction between treatment and stratum with ordinal responses.
    Uesaka H
    Biometrics; 1993 Mar; 49(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 8513097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating surrogate markers of clinical outcome when measured with error.
    Dafni UG; Tsiatis AA
    Biometrics; 1998 Dec; 54(4):1445-62. PubMed ID: 9883544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Advanced statistics: the propensity score--a method for estimating treatment effect in observational research.
    Newgard CD; Hedges JR; Arthur M; Mullins RJ
    Acad Emerg Med; 2004 Sep; 11(9):953-61. PubMed ID: 15347546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Confounding by severity and indication in observational studies of antidepressant effectiveness.
    Patten SB
    Can J Clin Pharmacol; 2008; 15(2):e367-71. PubMed ID: 18840922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution on respiratory and cardiovascular mortality in the Netherlands: the NLCS-AIR study.
    Brunekreef B; Beelen R; Hoek G; Schouten L; Bausch-Goldbohm S; Fischer P; Armstrong B; Hughes E; Jerrett M; van den Brandt P
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 Mar; (139):5-71; discussion 73-89. PubMed ID: 19554969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Baseline and treatment effect heterogeneity for survival times between centers using a random effects accelerated failure time model with flexible error distribution.
    Komárek A; Lesaffre E; Legrand C
    Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(30):5457-72. PubMed ID: 17910009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of miss-specified baseline characteristics on inference for longitudinal trends in linear mixed models.
    Verbeke G; Fieuws S
    Biostatistics; 2007 Oct; 8(4):772-83. PubMed ID: 17384079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bayesian propensity score analysis for observational data.
    McCandless LC; Gustafson P; Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2009 Jan; 28(1):94-112. PubMed ID: 19012268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.