1098 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16345043)
1. Longitudinal and repeated cross-sectional cluster-randomization designs using mixed effects regression for binary outcomes: bias and coverage of frequentist and Bayesian methods.
Localio AR; Berlin JA; Have TR
Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(16):2720-36. PubMed ID: 16345043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Strategies for analyzing multilevel cluster-randomized studies with binary outcomes collected at varying intervals of time.
Olsen MK; DeLong ER; Oddone EZ; Bosworth HB
Stat Med; 2008 Dec; 27(29):6055-71. PubMed ID: 18825655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of statistical methods for analysis of clustered binary observations.
Heo M; Leon AC
Stat Med; 2005 Mar; 24(6):911-23. PubMed ID: 15558576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A simulation study of odds ratio estimation for binary outcomes from cluster randomized trials.
Ukoumunne OC; Carlin JB; Gulliford MC
Stat Med; 2007 Aug; 26(18):3415-28. PubMed ID: 17154246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of the statistical power of different methods for the analysis of cluster randomization trials with binary outcomes.
Austin PC
Stat Med; 2007 Aug; 26(19):3550-65. PubMed ID: 17238238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A simulation study to assess statistical methods for binary repeated measures data.
Masaoud E; Stryhn H
Prev Vet Med; 2010 Feb; 93(2-3):81-97. PubMed ID: 20004989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An evaluation of statistical approaches for analyzing physician-randomized quality improvement interventions.
Stedman MR; Gagnon DR; Lew RA; Solomon DH; Brookhart MA
Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Sep; 29(5):687-95. PubMed ID: 18571476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the risk difference, risk ratio and odds ratio scales for quantifying the unadjusted intervention effect in cluster randomized trials.
Ukoumunne OC; Forbes AB; Carlin JB; Gulliford MC
Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(25):5143-55. PubMed ID: 18613226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pseudo cluster randomization: a treatment allocation method to minimize contamination and selection bias.
Borm GF; Melis RJ; Teerenstra S; Peer PG
Stat Med; 2005 Dec; 24(23):3535-47. PubMed ID: 16007575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sample size adjustments for varying cluster sizes in cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes analyzed with second-order PQL mixed logistic regression.
Candel MJ; Van Breukelen GJ
Stat Med; 2010 Jun; 29(14):1488-501. PubMed ID: 20101669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Baseline adjustments for binary data in repeated cross-sectional cluster randomized trials.
Nixon RM; Thompson SG
Stat Med; 2003 Sep; 22(17):2673-92. PubMed ID: 12939779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Random effects probit and logistic regression models for three-level data.
Gibbons RD; Hedeker D
Biometrics; 1997 Dec; 53(4):1527-37. PubMed ID: 9423267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance of a mixed effects logistic regression model for binary outcomes with unequal cluster size.
Heo M; Leon AC
J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(3):513-26. PubMed ID: 15920895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Blinded assessment of treatment effects utilizing information about the randomization block length.
Miller F; Friede T; Kieser M
Stat Med; 2009 May; 28(12):1690-706. PubMed ID: 19340815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of underlying risk as a source of heterogeneity in meta-analyses: a simulation study of Bayesian and frequentist implementations of three models.
Dohoo I; Stryhn H; Sanchez J
Prev Vet Med; 2007 Sep; 81(1-3):38-55. PubMed ID: 17477995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Varying cluster sizes in trials with clusters in one treatment arm: sample size adjustments when testing treatment effects with linear mixed models.
Candel MJ; Van Breukelen GJ
Stat Med; 2009 Aug; 28(18):2307-24. PubMed ID: 19472169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bayesian decision-theoretic group sequential clinical trial design based on a quadratic loss function: a frequentist evaluation.
Lewis RJ; Lipsky AM; Berry DA
Clin Trials; 2007; 4(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 17327241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of methods to analyse continuous data from pseudo cluster randomized trials.
Teerenstra S; Moerbeek M; Melis RJ; Borm GF
Stat Med; 2007 Sep; 26(22):4100-15. PubMed ID: 17328006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mixed effects logistic regression models for longitudinal binary response data with informative drop-out.
Ten Have TR; Kunselman AR; Pulkstenis EP; Landis JR
Biometrics; 1998 Mar; 54(1):367-83. PubMed ID: 9544529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Developments in cluster randomized trials and Statistics in Medicine.
Campbell MJ; Donner A; Klar N
Stat Med; 2007 Jan; 26(1):2-19. PubMed ID: 17136746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
