These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16345048)

  • 1. A Bayesian determination of threshold for identifying differentially expressed genes in microarray experiments.
    Chen J; Sarkar SK
    Stat Med; 2006 Sep; 25(18):3174-89. PubMed ID: 16345048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Determination of the differentially expressed genes in microarray experiments using local FDR.
    Aubert J; Bar-Hen A; Daudin JJ; Robin S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Sep; 5():125. PubMed ID: 15350197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Empirical bayes methods and false discovery rates for microarrays.
    Efron B; Tibshirani R
    Genet Epidemiol; 2002 Jun; 23(1):70-86. PubMed ID: 12112249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tail posterior probability for inference in pairwise and multiclass gene expression data.
    Bochkina N; Richardson S
    Biometrics; 2007 Dec; 63(4):1117-25. PubMed ID: 18078482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Semi-parametric differential expression analysis via partial mixture estimation.
    Rossell D; Guerra R; Scott C
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2008; 7(1):Article15. PubMed ID: 18454730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hierarchical Bayes models for cDNA microarray gene expression.
    Lönnstedt I; Britton T
    Biostatistics; 2005 Apr; 6(2):279-91. PubMed ID: 15772106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. FDR-controlling testing procedures and sample size determination for microarrays.
    Li SS; Bigler J; Lampe JW; Potter JD; Feng Z
    Stat Med; 2005 Aug; 24(15):2267-80. PubMed ID: 15977294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fully Bayesian mixture model for differential gene expression: simulations and model checks.
    Lewin A; Bochkina N; Richardson S
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2007; 6():Article36. PubMed ID: 18171320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating the false discovery rate using nonparametric deconvolution.
    van de Wiel MA; Kim KI
    Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):806-15. PubMed ID: 17825012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. False discovery rate, sensitivity and sample size for microarray studies.
    Pawitan Y; Michiels S; Koscielny S; Gusnanto A; Ploner A
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 21(13):3017-24. PubMed ID: 15840707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Bayesian approach to estimation and testing in time-course microarray experiments.
    Angelini C; De Canditiis D; Mutarelli M; Pensky M
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2007; 6():Article24. PubMed ID: 17910530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Wavelet thresholding with bayesian false discovery rate control.
    Tadesse MG; Ibrahim JG; Vannucci M; Gentleman R
    Biometrics; 2005 Mar; 61(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 15737075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multidimensional local false discovery rate for microarray studies.
    Ploner A; Calza S; Gusnanto A; Pawitan Y
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Mar; 22(5):556-65. PubMed ID: 16368770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identification of differentially expressed gene categories in microarray studies using nonparametric multivariate analysis.
    Nettleton D; Recknor J; Reecy JM
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Jan; 24(2):192-201. PubMed ID: 18042553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quick calculation for sample size while controlling false discovery rate with application to microarray analysis.
    Liu P; Hwang JT
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Mar; 23(6):739-46. PubMed ID: 17237060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Significance testing for small microarray experiments.
    Kooperberg C; Aragaki A; Strand AD; Olson JM
    Stat Med; 2005 Aug; 24(15):2281-98. PubMed ID: 15889452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Linear mixed model selection for false discovery rate control in microarray data analysis.
    Demirkale CY; Nettleton D; Maiti T
    Biometrics; 2010 Jun; 66(2):621-9. PubMed ID: 19522873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Incorporating prior information via shrinkage: a combined analysis of genome-wide location data and gene expression data.
    Xie Y; Pan W; Jeong KS; Khodursky A
    Stat Med; 2007 May; 26(10):2258-75. PubMed ID: 16958153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multiple testing on standardized mortality ratios: a Bayesian hierarchical model for FDR estimation.
    Ventrucci M; Scott EM; Cocchi D
    Biostatistics; 2011 Jan; 12(1):51-67. PubMed ID: 20577014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An investigation of two multivariate permutation methods for controlling the false discovery proportion.
    Korn EL; Li MC; McShane LM; Simon R
    Stat Med; 2007 Oct; 26(24):4428-40. PubMed ID: 17357994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.