These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16345059)

  • 1. The implications of publication bias for meta-analysis' other parameter.
    Jackson D
    Stat Med; 2006 Sep; 25(17):2911-21. PubMed ID: 16345059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of the trim and fill method in the presence of publication bias and between-study heterogeneity.
    Peters JL; Sutton AJ; Jones DR; Abrams KR; Rushton L
    Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(25):4544-62. PubMed ID: 17476644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Macaskill P; Walter SD; Irwig L
    Stat Med; 2001 Feb; 20(4):641-54. PubMed ID: 11223905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. N-acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy: publication bias perpetuated by meta-analyses.
    Vaitkus PT; Brar C
    Am Heart J; 2007 Feb; 153(2):275-80. PubMed ID: 17239689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Publication bias in medical informatics evaluation research: is it an issue or not?
    Machan C; Ammenwerth E; Bodner T
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 124():957-62. PubMed ID: 17108634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Confidence intervals and P-values for meta-analysis with publication bias.
    Henmi M; Copas JB; Eguchi S
    Biometrics; 2007 Jun; 63(2):475-82. PubMed ID: 17688500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adjusting for publication bias in the presence of heterogeneity.
    Terrin N; Schmid CH; Lau J; Olkin I
    Stat Med; 2003 Jul; 22(13):2113-26. PubMed ID: 12820277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using pseudo-data to correct for publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Bowden J; Thompson JR; Burton P
    Stat Med; 2006 Nov; 25(22):3798-813. PubMed ID: 16382418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating the proportion of studies missing for meta-analysis due to publication bias.
    Formann AK
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Sep; 29(5):732-9. PubMed ID: 18586577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Publication bias was not a good reason to discourage trials with low power.
    Borm GF; den Heijer M; Zielhuis GA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jan; 62(1):47.e1-10. PubMed ID: 18620841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A robust P-value for treatment effect in meta-analysis with publication bias.
    Copas JB; Malley PF
    Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(21):4267-78. PubMed ID: 18384185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Arcsine test for publication bias in meta-analyses with binary outcomes.
    Rücker G; Schwarzer G; Carpenter J
    Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(5):746-63. PubMed ID: 17592831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry.
    Peters JL; Sutton AJ; Jones DR; Abrams KR; Rushton L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Oct; 61(10):991-6. PubMed ID: 18538991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Confidence intervals for random effects meta-analysis and robustness to publication bias.
    Henmi M; Copas JB
    Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(29):2969-83. PubMed ID: 20963748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Updating meta-analyses leads to larger type I errors than publication bias.
    Borm GF; Donders AR
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Aug; 62(8):825-830.e10. PubMed ID: 19136233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A bound for publication bias based on the fraction of unpublished studies.
    Copas J; Jackson D
    Biometrics; 2004 Mar; 60(1):146-53. PubMed ID: 15032784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inflation of type I error rate in two statistical tests for the detection of publication bias in meta-analyses with binary outcomes.
    Schwarzer G; Antes G; Schumacher M
    Stat Med; 2002 Sep; 21(17):2465-77. PubMed ID: 12205693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Empirical evaluation showed that the Copas selection model provided a useful summary in 80% of meta-analyses.
    Carpenter JR; Schwarzer G; Rücker G; Künstler R
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jun; 62(6):624-631.e4. PubMed ID: 19282148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: a large survey.
    Ioannidis JP; Trikalinos TA
    CMAJ; 2007 Apr; 176(8):1091-6. PubMed ID: 17420491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of publication bias for the surgeon scientist.
    Mahid SS; Qadan M; Hornung CA; Galandiuk S
    Br J Surg; 2008 Aug; 95(8):943-9. PubMed ID: 18618864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.