These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1634975)

  • 1. Role of osteopromotion in experimental bone grafting to the skull: a study in adult rats using a membrane technique.
    Alberius P; Dahlin C; Linde A
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1992 Aug; 50(8):829-34. PubMed ID: 1634975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of rhBMP-2 and osteopromotive membranes on experimental bone grafting.
    Gordh M; Alberius P; Johnell O; Lindberg L; Linde A
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1999 Jun; 103(7):1909-18. PubMed ID: 10359253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Volume maintenance of onlay bone grafts in the craniofacial skeleton: micro-architecture versus embryologic origin.
    Ozaki W; Buchman SR
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1998 Aug; 102(2):291-9. PubMed ID: 9703062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Osteopromotive membranes enhance onlay integration and maintenance in the adult rat skull.
    Gordh M; Alberius P; Johnell O; Lindberg L; Linde A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1998 Feb; 27(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 9506306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparative analysis of the microarchitecture of cortical membranous and cortical endochondral onlay bone grafts in the craniofacial skeleton.
    Ozaki W; Buchman SR; Goldstein SA; Fyhrie DP
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1999 Jul; 104(1):139-47. PubMed ID: 10597686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Volume maintenance of inlay bone grafts in the craniofacial skeleton.
    Rosenthal AH; Buchman SR
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2003 Sep; 112(3):802-11. PubMed ID: 12960861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bone formation in cranial, mandibular, tibial and iliac bone grafts in rats.
    Solheim E; Pinholt EM; Talsnes O; Larsen TB; Kirkeby OJ
    J Craniofac Surg; 1995 Mar; 6(2):139-42. PubMed ID: 8601019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Secondary alveolar bone grafting: the dilemma of donor site selection and morbidity.
    Rawashdeh MA; Telfah H
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Dec; 46(8):665-70. PubMed ID: 18760515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of three barrier membranes on modeling and incorporation of autologous onlay bone grafts in rats. An evaluation by transversal microradiography.
    Gielkens PF; Hoogeveen EJ; Schortinghuis J; Ruben JL; Huysmans MC; Stegenga B
    Arch Oral Biol; 2009 Jun; 54(6):549-55. PubMed ID: 19344887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Craniofacial onlay bone grafting: a prospective evaluation of graft morphology, orientation, and embryonic origin.
    Hardesty RA; Marsh JL
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1990 Jan; 85(1):5-14; discussion 15. PubMed ID: 2293737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Survival of onlay bone grafts. A study in the adult rat.
    Gordh M
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1998; 127():1-52. PubMed ID: 9646395
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Growth factors and bone regeneration. Implications of barrier membranes.
    Zellin G
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1998; 129():7-65. PubMed ID: 9672999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantitative comparison of volume maintenance between inlay and onlay bone grafts in the craniofacial skeleton.
    Sugg KB; Rosenthal AH; Ozaki W; Buchman SR
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 May; 131(5):1014-1021. PubMed ID: 23629083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Long-term stability of autogenous bone grafts following combined application with guided bone regeneration.
    Donos N; Kostopoulos L; Tonetti M; Karring T
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Apr; 16(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 15777321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Comparative study on early revascularization of membranous and endochondral onlay bone grafts in the rat].
    Yang B; Zhao M; Liu Z
    Zhonghua Zheng Xing Shao Shang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 1999 May; 15(3):196-8. PubMed ID: 11501120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mandibular onlay grafting using prefabricated bone grafts with primary implant placement: an experimental study in minipigs.
    Schliephake H; Aleyt J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(3):384-93. PubMed ID: 9638009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Membranous versus endochondral bone: implications for craniofacial reconstruction.
    Zins JE; Whitaker LA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1983 Dec; 72(6):778-85. PubMed ID: 6196801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Restoration of mandibular nonunion bone defects. An experimental study in rats using an osteopromotive membrane method.
    Dahlin C; Sandberg E; Alberius P; Linde A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1994 Aug; 23(4):237-42. PubMed ID: 7798697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of barrier membranes on autologous bone grafts.
    Gielkens PF; Schortinghuis J; de Jong JR; Paans AM; Ruben JL; Raghoebar GM; Stegenga B; Bos RR
    J Dent Res; 2008 Nov; 87(11):1048-52. PubMed ID: 18946013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Osteopromotion for cranioplasty. An experimental study in rats using a membrane technique.
    Dahlin C; Alberius P; Linde A
    J Neurosurg; 1991 Mar; 74(3):487-91. PubMed ID: 1993913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.