These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
43. A comprehensive assessment of human strivings: test-retest reliability and validity of the Reiss Profile. Havercamp SM; Reiss S J Pers Assess; 2003 Oct; 81(2):123-32. PubMed ID: 12946919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Shared variance in the California Psychological Inventory and the California Q-Set. Lanning K; Gough HG J Pers Soc Psychol; 1991 Apr; 60(4):596-606. PubMed ID: 2037969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. A cybernetic model of global personality traits. Van Egeren LF Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2009 May; 13(2):92-108. PubMed ID: 19351887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Metatraits of the Big Five differentially predict engagement and restraint of behavior. Hirsh JB; Deyoung CG; Peterson JB J Pers; 2009 Aug; 77(4):1085-102. PubMed ID: 19558442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Relationship between clinician assessment and self-assessment of personality disorders using the SWAP-200 and PAI. Bradley R; Hilsenroth M; Guarnaccia C; Westen D Psychol Assess; 2007 Jun; 19(2):225-9. PubMed ID: 17563203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. A comparison of five-factor personality dimensions in males with sexual dysfunction and males with paraphilia. Fagan PJ; Wise TN; Schmidt CW; Ponticas Y; Marshall RD; Costa PT J Pers Assess; 1991 Dec; 57(3):434-48. PubMed ID: 1757870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Reliability of observer ratings in the assessment of personality disorders: a preliminary study. Coolidge FL; Burns EM; Mooney JA J Clin Psychol; 1995 Jan; 51(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 7782470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Personality and psychopathology: an application of the five-factor model. Widiger TA; Trull TJ J Pers; 1992 Jun; 60(2):363-93. PubMed ID: 1635047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Self-report problem scales and subscales and behavioral ratings provided by peers: unique evidence of test validity. Wrobel NH; Lachar D; Wrobel TA Assessment; 2005 Sep; 12(3):255-69. PubMed ID: 16123247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Perceptions of social desirability and frequency of occurrence of traits and the probability that the traits will be endorsed. Bernhardson CS; Fisher RJ Percept Mot Skills; 1970 Apr; 30(2):571-6. PubMed ID: 5454063 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Assessment of dependency, agreeableness, and their relationship. Lowe JR; Edmundson M; Widiger TA Psychol Assess; 2009 Dec; 21(4):543-53. PubMed ID: 19947788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. No evidence that social desirability response set explains the general factor of personality and its affective correlates. Rushton JP; Erdle S Twin Res Hum Genet; 2010 Apr; 13(2):131-4. PubMed ID: 20397743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. An evaluation of evaluative personality terms: a comparison of the big seven and five-factor model in predicting psychopathology. Durrett C; Trull TJ Psychol Assess; 2005 Sep; 17(3):359-68. PubMed ID: 16262461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Self-report assessment of the DSM-IV personality disorders. Measurement of trait and distress characteristics: the ADP-IV. Schotte CK; de Doncker D; Vankerckhoven C; Vertommen H; Cosyns P Psychol Med; 1998 Sep; 28(5):1179-88. PubMed ID: 9794025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Figuring out factors: the use and misuse of factor analysis. Streiner DL Can J Psychiatry; 1994 Apr; 39(3):135-40. PubMed ID: 8033017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]