107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16351611)
1. Ultrasound characteristics of histologically proven grade 3 invasive ductal breast carcinoma.
Rotstein AH; Neerhut PK
Australas Radiol; 2005 Dec; 49(6):476-9. PubMed ID: 16351611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Correlation between ultrasound characteristics, mammographic findings and histological grade in patients with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast.
Lamb PM; Perry NM; Vinnicombe SJ; Wells CA
Clin Radiol; 2000 Jan; 55(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 10650109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sonographic appearance of invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast according to histologic grade.
Blaichman J; Marcus JC; Alsaadi T; El-Khoury M; Meterissian S; Mesurolle B
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Sep; 199(3):W402-8. PubMed ID: 22915433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Sonographic criteria for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions using real-time spatial compound imaging in combination with XRES adaptive image processing].
Hahn M; Roessner L; Krainick-Strobel U; Gruber IV; Krämer B; Gall C; Siegmann KC; Wallwiener D; Kagan KO
Ultraschall Med; 2012 Jun; 33(3):270-4. PubMed ID: 20614412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonographic findings of different histopathologic types of breast cancer.
Wang X; Xu P; Wang Y; Grant EG
Acta Radiol; 2011 Apr; 52(3):248-55. PubMed ID: 21498359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Correlation of sonographic features of invasive ductal mammary carcinoma with age, tumor grade, and hormone-receptor status.
Aho M; Irshad A; Ackerman SJ; Lewis M; Leddy R; Pope TL; Campbell AS; Cluver A; Wolf BJ; Cunningham JE
J Clin Ultrasound; 2013 Jan; 41(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 22996916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Screen-detected mucinous breast carcinoma: potential for delayed diagnosis.
Dhillon R; Depree P; Metcalf C; Wylie E
Clin Radiol; 2006 May; 61(5):423-30. PubMed ID: 16679116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radiologic Findings of a Rare Subtype of Invasive Breast Cancer with Poor Prognosis: Metaplastic Carcinoma of the Breast.
Aydin H; Guner B; Bostanci IE; Ciledag N; Bulut MB; Bozgul M; Dilek GB; Aribas BK
Curr Med Imaging Rev; 2019; 15(3):338-348. PubMed ID: 31989886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pure lobular carcinoma of the breast presenting as a hyperechoic mass: incidence and imaging characteristics.
Jones KN; Magut M; Henrichsen TL; Boughey JC; Reynolds C; Glazebrook KN
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Nov; 201(5):W765-9. PubMed ID: 24147507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of sonographic features for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast tumors of different sizes.
Chen SC; Cheung YC; Su CH; Chen MF; Hwang TL; Hsueh S
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Feb; 23(2):188-93. PubMed ID: 14770402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Preoperative MRT of the breast in invasive lobular carcinoma in comparison with invasive ductal carcinoma].
Diekmann F; Diekmann S; Beljavskaja M; Bick U; Taupitz M; Blohmer JU; Winzer KJ; Hamm B
Rofo; 2004 Apr; 176(4):544-9. PubMed ID: 15088179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ultrasound characteristics of sclerosing adenosis mimicking breast carcinoma.
Liu W; Li W; Li Z; Shi L; Zhao P; Guo Z; Tian J; Wang Z
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 May; 181(1):127-134. PubMed ID: 32227257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast: clinical, mammographic, and sonographic findings with histopathologic correlation.
Günhan-Bilgen I; Zekioglu O; Ustün EE; Memis A; Erhan Y
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Oct; 179(4):927-31. PubMed ID: 12239039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ultrasound examination is useful for prediction of histologic type in invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast.
Kijima Y; Yoshinaka H; Koriyama C; Funasako Y; Natsugoe S; Aikou T
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Apr; 34(4):517-24. PubMed ID: 18045769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Benign versus malignant solid breast masses: US differentiation.
Rahbar G; Sie AC; Hansen GC; Prince JS; Melany ML; Reynolds HE; Jackson VP; Sayre JW; Bassett LW
Radiology; 1999 Dec; 213(3):889-94. PubMed ID: 10580971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of sonographic features in the differentiation of fibroadenoma and invasive ductal carcinoma.
Skaane P; Engedal K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 9423610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sonographic differentiation of invasive and intraductal carcinomas of the breast.
Chen SC; Cheung YC; Lo YF; Chen MF; Hwang TL; Su CH; Hsueh S
Br J Radiol; 2003 Sep; 76(909):600-4. PubMed ID: 14500273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A prospective study about abnormal ductal dilatations without associated masses on breast US: what is the significance for us?
Song SE; Yie A; Seo BK; Lee SH; Cho KR; Woo OH; Lee KY; Kim YS
Acad Radiol; 2012 Mar; 19(3):296-302. PubMed ID: 22173322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is there different correlation with prognostic factors between "non-mass" and "mass" type invasive ductal breast cancers?
Jiang L; Zhou Y; Wang Z; Lu X; Chen M; Zhou C
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Sep; 82(9):1404-9. PubMed ID: 23540946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Role of ultrasonography and MRI in the detection of wide intraductal component of invasive breast cancer--a prospective study.
Sundararajan S; Tohno E; Kamma H; Ueno E; Minami M
Clin Radiol; 2007 Mar; 62(3):252-61. PubMed ID: 17293219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
