These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16354142)

  • 1. Comparison of aboriginal and nonaboriginal applicants for admissions on the Multiple Mini-Interview using aboriginal and nonaboriginal interviewers.
    Moreau K; Reiter H; Eva KW
    Teach Learn Med; 2006; 18(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 16354142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Should efforts in favor of medical student diversity be focused during admissions or farther upstream?
    Reiter HI; Lockyer J; Ziola B; Courneya CA; Eva K;
    Acad Med; 2012 Apr; 87(4):443-8. PubMed ID: 22361795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predictors of success in medicine.
    Reede JY
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1999 May; (362):72-7. PubMed ID: 10335282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Increasing the relative weight of noncognitive admission criteria improves underrepresented minority admission rates to medical school.
    Ballejos MP; Rhyne RL; Parkes J
    Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 25893937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Non-association between Neo-5 personality tests and multiple mini-interview.
    Kulasegaram K; Reiter HI; Wiesner W; Hackett RD; Norman GR
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2010 Aug; 15(3):415-23. PubMed ID: 20013153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Introduction of the multiple mini interview into the admissions process at the University of Calgary: acceptability and feasibility.
    Brownell K; Lockyer J; Collin T; Lemay JF
    Med Teach; 2007 May; 29(4):394-6. PubMed ID: 17786758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of applicants to the veterinary curriculum using a multiple mini-interview method.
    Hecker K; Donnon T; Fuentealba C; Hall D; Illanes O; Morck DW; Muelling C
    J Vet Med Educ; 2009; 36(2):166-73. PubMed ID: 19625664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Students versus faculty members as admissions interviewers: comparisons of ratings data and admissions decisions.
    Eddins-Folensbee FF; Harris TB; Miller-Wasik M; Thompson B
    Acad Med; 2012 Apr; 87(4):458-62. PubMed ID: 22361799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How Medical School Applicant Race, Ethnicity, and Socioeconomic Status Relate to Multiple Mini-Interview-Based Admissions Outcomes: Findings From One Medical School.
    Jerant A; Fancher T; Fenton JJ; Fiscella K; Sousa F; Franks P; Henderson M
    Acad Med; 2015 Dec; 90(12):1667-74. PubMed ID: 26017355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multiple mini-interviews versus traditional interviews: stakeholder acceptability comparison.
    Razack S; Faremo S; Drolet F; Snell L; Wiseman J; Pickering J
    Med Educ; 2009 Oct; 43(10):993-1000. PubMed ID: 19769649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of medical school applicants' demographic and cognitive characteristics on interviewers' ratings of noncognitive traits.
    Shaw DL; Martz DM; Lancaster CJ; Sade RM
    Acad Med; 1995 Jun; 70(6):532-6. PubMed ID: 7786374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical experience and minority group students. A perspective from Harvard Medical School.
    Poussaint AF
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1999 May; (362):78-84. PubMed ID: 10335283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The use of a structured interview guide in veterinary college admissions.
    Molgaard LK; Lewis RE
    J Vet Med Educ; 2008; 35(3):460-5. PubMed ID: 19066365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of factors that predict clinical performance in medical school.
    White CB; Dey EL; Fantone JC
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2009 Oct; 14(4):455-64. PubMed ID: 18030590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Overview: what's worked and what hasn't as a guide towards predictive admissions tool development.
    Siu E; Reiter HI
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2009 Dec; 14(5):759-75. PubMed ID: 19340597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The ability of the pre-admission criteria to predict performance in a Saudi medical school.
    Al-Rukban MO; Munshi FM; Abdulghani HM; Al-Hoqail I
    Saudi Med J; 2010 May; 31(5):560-4. PubMed ID: 20464048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Minorities and the orthopaedic profession.
    Ayers CE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1999 May; (362):58-64. PubMed ID: 10335280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of MCAT and GPA preadmission academic metrics on interview scores.
    Gay SE; Santen SA; Mangrulkar RS; Sisson TH; Ross PT; Zaidi NLB
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2018 Mar; 23(1):151-158. PubMed ID: 28501933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Core personal competencies important to entering students' success in medical school: what are they and how could they be assessed early in the admission process?
    Koenig TW; Parrish SK; Terregino CA; Williams JP; Dunleavy DM; Volsch JM
    Acad Med; 2013 May; 88(5):603-13. PubMed ID: 23524928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improving nursing school diversity through use of a group admission interview.
    Trice LB; Foster PH
    AORN J; 2008 Mar; 87(3):522-32. PubMed ID: 18328276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.