These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16354752)

  • 1. Logistic regression protects against population structure in genetic association studies.
    Setakis E; Stirnadel H; Balding DJ
    Genome Res; 2006 Feb; 16(2):290-6. PubMed ID: 16354752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Case-control association tests correcting for population stratification.
    Köhler K; Bickeböller H
    Ann Hum Genet; 2006 Jan; 70(Pt 1):98-115. PubMed ID: 16441260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating the ability of tree-based methods and logistic regression for the detection of SNP-SNP interaction.
    García-Magariños M; López-de-Ullibarri I; Cao R; Salas A
    Ann Hum Genet; 2009 May; 73(Pt 3):360-9. PubMed ID: 19291098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An analytical comparison of the principal component method and the mixed effects model for association studies in the presence of cryptic relatedness and population stratification.
    Wang K; Hu X; Peng Y
    Hum Hered; 2013; 76(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 23921716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robust genomic control and robust delta centralization tests for case-control association studies.
    Zang Y; Zhang H; Yang Y; Zheng G
    Hum Hered; 2007; 63(3-4):187-95. PubMed ID: 17310128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A novel parallel approach to the likelihood-based estimation of admixture in population genetics.
    Giovannini A; Zanghirati G; Beaumont MA; Chikhi L; Barbujani G
    Bioinformatics; 2009 Jun; 25(11):1440-1. PubMed ID: 19286832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analytical correction for multiple testing in admixture mapping.
    Sha Q; Zhang X; Zhu X; Zhang S
    Hum Hered; 2006; 62(2):55-63. PubMed ID: 17047335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of population substructure on trend tests for genetic case-control association studies.
    Zheng G; Li Z; Gail MH; Gastwirth JL
    Biometrics; 2010 Mar; 66(1):196-204. PubMed ID: 19432788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of assortative mating upon genetic association studies: spurious associations and population substructure in the absence of admixture.
    Redden DT; Allison DB
    Behav Genet; 2006 Sep; 36(5):678-86. PubMed ID: 16514473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. SNP-based analysis of genetic substructure in the German population.
    Steffens M; Lamina C; Illig T; Bettecken T; Vogler R; Entz P; Suk EK; Toliat MR; Klopp N; Caliebe A; König IR; Köhler K; Ludemann J; Diaz Lacava A; Fimmers R; Lichtner P; Ziegler A; Wolf A; Krawczak M; Nūrnberg P; Hampe J; Schreiber S; Meitinger T; Wichmann HE; Roeder K; Wienker TF; Baur MP
    Hum Hered; 2006; 62(1):20-9. PubMed ID: 17003564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computing genetic imprinting expressed by haplotypes.
    Cheng Y; Berg A; Wu S; Li Y; Wu R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 573():189-212. PubMed ID: 19763929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of human population structure on large genetic association studies.
    Marchini J; Cardon LR; Phillips MS; Donnelly P
    Nat Genet; 2004 May; 36(5):512-7. PubMed ID: 15052271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the power to detect SNP/phenotype association in candidate quantitative trait loci genomic regions: a simulation study.
    Comeron JM; Kreitman M; De La Vega FM
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 2003; ():478-89. PubMed ID: 12603051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Bayesian segmentation approach to ascertain copy number variations at the population level.
    Wu LY; Chipman HA; Bull SB; Briollais L; Wang K
    Bioinformatics; 2009 Jul; 25(13):1669-79. PubMed ID: 19389735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Association mapping, using a mixture model for complex traits.
    Zhu X; Zhang S; Zhao H; Cooper RS
    Genet Epidemiol; 2002 Aug; 23(2):181-96. PubMed ID: 12214310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of methods accounting for population structure with pedigree data and continuous outcomes.
    Peloso GM; Dupuis J; Lunetta KL
    Genet Epidemiol; 2011 Sep; 35(6):427-36. PubMed ID: 21618600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A population-based latent variable approach for association mapping of quantitative trait loci.
    Wang T; Weir B; Zeng ZB
    Ann Hum Genet; 2006 Jul; 70(Pt 4):506-23. PubMed ID: 16759182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Digital genetics: unravelling the genetic basis of evolution.
    Adami C
    Nat Rev Genet; 2006 Feb; 7(2):109-18. PubMed ID: 16418746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computationally Efficient Composite Likelihood Statistics for Demographic Inference.
    Coffman AJ; Hsieh PH; Gravel S; Gutenkunst RN
    Mol Biol Evol; 2016 Feb; 33(2):591-3. PubMed ID: 26545922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Case-control studies of association in structured or admixed populations.
    Pritchard JK; Donnelly P
    Theor Popul Biol; 2001 Nov; 60(3):227-37. PubMed ID: 11855957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.