168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16355036)
1. 64- Versus 16-slice CT angiography for coronary artery stent assessment: in vitro experience.
Seifarth H; Ozgün M; Raupach R; Flohr T; Heindel W; Fischbach R; Maintz D
Invest Radiol; 2006 Jan; 41(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 16355036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improved coronary artery stent visualization and in-stent stenosis detection using 16-slice computed-tomography and dedicated image reconstruction technique.
Maintz D; Seifarth H; Flohr T; Krämer S; Wichter T; Heindel W; Fischbach R
Invest Radiol; 2003 Dec; 38(12):790-5. PubMed ID: 14627897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 64-slice computed tomography assessment of coronary artery stents: a phantom study.
Mahnken AH; Mühlenbruch G; Seyfarth T; Flohr T; Stanzel S; Wildberger JE; Günther RW; Kuettner A
Acta Radiol; 2006 Feb; 47(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 16498931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance of dual source versus 256-slice multi-slice CT in the evaluation of 16 coronary artery stents.
André F; Korosoglou G; Hosch W; Giannitsis E; Kauczor HU; Katus HA; Steen H
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Apr; 82(4):601-7. PubMed ID: 23280306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Visualization of the intra-stent lumen in the coronary arteries and detection of restenoses with 64-slices tomography scanners with cardiac synchronization: first experience].
Larchez C; Daoud B; Ghostine S; Caussin C; Lancelin B; Paul JF
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 2006 Dec; 99(12):1184-90. PubMed ID: 18942519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 64-slice multidetector coronary CT angiography: in vitro evaluation of 68 different stents.
Maintz D; Seifarth H; Raupach R; Flohr T; Rink M; Sommer T; Ozgün M; Heindel W; Fischbach R
Eur Radiol; 2006 Apr; 16(4):818-26. PubMed ID: 16333623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of coronary stent in vitro on multislice computed tomography angiography: improved in-stent visibility by the use of 140-kV tube voltage.
Suzuki S; Furui S; Kuwahara S; Kaminaga T; Yamauchi T; Kawasaki T; Konno K; Kozuma K; Isshiki T
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(3):414-21. PubMed ID: 17538289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro imaging of coronary artery stents: are there differences between 16- and 64-slice CT scanners?
Wolf F; Feuchtner GM; Homolka P; Langenberger H; Stadler A; Bader TR; Weber M; Lammer J; Loewe C
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 68(3):465-70. PubMed ID: 17913428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perceptibility and quantification of in-stent stenosis with six peripheral arterial stent types in vitro: comparison of 16-MDCT angiography, 64-MDCT angiography, and MR angiography.
Schernthaner MB; Edelhauser G; Berzaczy D; Schernthaner R; Wolf F; Lammer J; Funovics MA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 May; 194(5):1346-51. PubMed ID: 20410424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro evaluation of coronary stents and in-stent stenosis using a dynamic cardiac phantom and a 64-detector row CT scanner.
Schlosser T; Scheuermann T; Ulzheimer S; Mohrs OK; Kühling M; Albrecht PE; Voigtländer T; Barkhausen J; Schmermund A
Clin Res Cardiol; 2007 Dec; 96(12):883-90. PubMed ID: 17694381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Next generation coronary CT angiography: in vitro evaluation of 27 coronary stents.
Gassenmaier T; Petri N; Allmendinger T; Flohr T; Maintz D; Voelker W; Bley TA
Eur Radiol; 2014 Nov; 24(11):2953-61. PubMed ID: 25038859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of coronary stents by 64-slice computed tomography: in-stent lumen visibility and patency.
Kong LY; Jin ZY; Zhang SY; Zhang ZH; Wang YN; Song L; Zhang XN; Zhang YQ
Chin Med Sci J; 2009 Sep; 24(3):156-60. PubMed ID: 19848316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of coronary stents in vitro with CT angiography: effect of stent diameter, convolution kernel, and vessel orientation to the z-axis.
Suzuki S; Furui S; Kaminaga T; Yamauchi T; Kuwahara S; Yokoyama N; Suzuki M; Isshiki T
Circ J; 2005 Sep; 69(9):1124-31. PubMed ID: 16127198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Revealing in-stent stenoses of the iliac arteries: comparison of multidetector CT with MR angiography and digital radiographic angiography in a Phantom model.
Maintz D; Tombach B; Juergens KU; Weigel S; Heindel W; Fischbach R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Nov; 179(5):1319-22. PubMed ID: 12388521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Photon-Counting CT: High-Resolution Imaging of Coronary Stents.
Mannil M; Hickethier T; von Spiczak J; Baer M; Henning A; Hertel M; Schmidt B; Flohr T; Maintz D; Alkadhi H
Invest Radiol; 2018 Mar; 53(3):143-149. PubMed ID: 28945655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimal scanning protocols of 64-slice CT angiography in coronary artery stents: an in vitro phantom study.
Almutairi AM; Sun Z; Ng C; Al-Safran ZA; Al-Mulla AA; Al-Jamaan AI
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Apr; 74(1):156-60. PubMed ID: 19231124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of vertebral artery stents using 16-slice multi-detector row CT angiography in vivo evaluation: comparison of a medium-smooth kernel and a sharp kernel.
Yoo WJ; Lim YS; Ahn KJ; Choi BG; Kim JY; Kim SH
Eur J Radiol; 2009 May; 70(2):362-8. PubMed ID: 18359179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Monoenergetic reconstructions for imaging of coronary artery stents using spectral detector CT: In-vitro experience and comparison to conventional images.
Hickethier T; Baeßler B; Kroeger JR; Doerner J; Pahn G; Maintz D; Michels G; Bunck AC
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017; 11(1):33-39. PubMed ID: 28096049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Photon Counting Computed Tomography With Dedicated Sharp Convolution Kernels: Tapping the Potential of a New Technology for Stent Imaging.
von Spiczak J; Mannil M; Peters B; Hickethier T; Baer M; Henning A; Schmidt B; Flohr T; Manka R; Maintz D; Alkadhi H
Invest Radiol; 2018 Aug; 53(8):486-494. PubMed ID: 29794949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Coronary artery stent imaging with 128-slice dual-source CT using high-pitch spiral acquisition in a cardiac phantom: comparison with the sequential and low-pitch spiral mode.
Wolf F; Leschka S; Loewe C; Homolka P; Plank C; Schernthaner R; Bercaczy D; Goetti R; Lammer J; Friedrich G; Marincek B; Alkadhi H; Feuchtner G
Eur Radiol; 2010 Sep; 20(9):2084-91. PubMed ID: 20397019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
