196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16355968)
1. Circuit board design for good electromagnetic compatibility performance.
Bearpark J
Med Device Technol; 2005 Oct; 16(8):26-7, 29. PubMed ID: 16355968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Best practice for electromagnetic compatibility.
Med Device Technol; 2005 Jun; 16(5):56-7. PubMed ID: 15984548
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Thin-film passive microcomponents for improved circuit performance.
Christian KD
Med Device Technol; 2004 Nov; 15(9):35-7. PubMed ID: 16231787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Designing medical equipment for electromagnetic compatibility.
Kirk S
Med Device Technol; 1992 May; 3(4):42-9. PubMed ID: 10147988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of surface mount FeedThru varistors on medical circuit design.
Demcko R
Med Device Technol; 2003 May; 14(4):30-1. PubMed ID: 12774576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effective electromagnetic interference shielding for electronic equipment.
Sheedy B
Med Device Technol; 2003 Nov; 14(9):39-41. PubMed ID: 14682024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis software can put surgical precision into medical device design.
Jain S
Med Device Technol; 2005 Nov; 16(9):24-6. PubMed ID: 16438445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Safe introduction of in-hospital wireless LAN.
Hanada E; Hoshino Y; Kudou T
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 2):1426-9. PubMed ID: 15361050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Solving electromagnetic compatibility problems in medical equipment.
Kirk S
Med Device Technol; 1992; 3(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 10171584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact of the revised electromagnetic compatibility standard.
Bozec D; Hayes DJ
Med Device Technol; 2004 Oct; 15(8):33-4, 36. PubMed ID: 16225272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Finite element modelling of medical devices.
Prendergast PJ; Lally C; Lennon AB
Med Eng Phys; 2009 May; 31(4):419. PubMed ID: 19329044
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Experience in designing equipment for testing technical means by the interference stability requirements].
Tukhas VA; Pozhidaev SV
Med Tekh; 2001; (3):12-4. PubMed ID: 11515258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hierarchical planning for a surface mounting machine placement.
Zeng YJ; Ma DZ; Jin Y; Yan JQ
J Zhejiang Univ Sci; 2004 Nov; 5(11):1449-55. PubMed ID: 15495340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Testing domestic and imported medical engineering products by the interference stability requirements].
Faĭzulaev BN; Oraevskiĭ KS; Porfir'ev IN; Logachev VV; Gorshkova IP
Med Tekh; 2001; (3):10-2. PubMed ID: 11515257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development of a circuit for functional electrical stimulation.
Cheng KW; Lu Y; Tong KY; Rad AB; Chow DH; Sutanto D
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2004 Mar; 12(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 15068186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Meeting design challenges of ultralow-power system-on-chip technology.
Morris S
Med Device Technol; 2004 Nov; 15(9):30-4. PubMed ID: 16231786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Electromagnetic compatibility management of wireless transceivers in electromagnetic-interference-sensitive medical environments.
Bit-Babik G; Morrissey JJ; Faraone A; Balzano Q
Ann Ist Super Sanita; 2007; 43(3):218-24. PubMed ID: 17938451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Electromagnetic immunity of medical devices: the European regulatory framework.
Calcagnini G; Censi F; Bartolini P
Ann Ist Super Sanita; 2007; 43(3):268-76. PubMed ID: 17938458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Designing screened enclosures: Part II.
Bearpark J
Med Device Technol; 2006 Mar; 17(2):30-2. PubMed ID: 16610717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Electromagnetic interference and cochlear implants.
Tognola G; Parazzini M; Sibella F; Paglialonga A; Ravazzani P
Ann Ist Super Sanita; 2007; 43(3):241-7. PubMed ID: 17938454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
