These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16356363)

  • 1. Identifying geographic disparities in the early detection of breast cancer using a geographic information system.
    McElroy JA; Remington PL; Gangnon RE; Hariharan L; Andersen LD
    Prev Chronic Dis; 2006 Jan; 3(1):A10. PubMed ID: 16356363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detection method and breast carcinoma histology.
    Newcomer LM; Newcomb PA; Trentham-Dietz A; Storer BE; Yasui Y; Daling JR; Potter JD
    Cancer; 2002 Aug; 95(3):470-7. PubMed ID: 12209738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Incidence of and treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
    Ernster VL; Barclay J; Kerlikowske K; Grady D; Henderson C
    JAMA; 1996 Mar; 275(12):913-8. PubMed ID: 8598618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Breast cancer stage at diagnosis and geographic access to mammography screening (New Hampshire, 1998-2004).
    Celaya MO; Berke EM; Onega TL; Gui J; Riddle BL; Cherala SS; Rees JR
    Rural Remote Health; 2010; 10(2):1361. PubMed ID: 20438282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mammography screening and the increase in breast cancer incidence in Hawaii.
    Maskarinec G; Wilkens L; Meng L
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1997 Mar; 6(3):201-8. PubMed ID: 9138664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Screening caused rising incidence rates of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
    van Steenbergen LN; Voogd AC; Roukema JA; Louwman WJ; Duijm LE; Coebergh JW; van de Poll-Franse LV
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2009 May; 115(1):181-3. PubMed ID: 18516674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.
    Lynge E
    APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Community trends in the early detection of breast cancer in Wisconsin, 1980-1998.
    Andersen LD; Remington PL; Trentham-Dietz A; Robert S
    Am J Prev Med; 2004 Jan; 26(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 14700713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Contributions of the epidemiological cancer registries to the evaluation of mammography screening in Germany].
    Urbschat I; Kieschke J; Schlanstedt-Jahn U; von Gehlen S; Thiel A; Jensch P
    Gesundheitswesen; 2005 Jul; 67(7):448-54. PubMed ID: 16103967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Urban-rural differences in the management of screen-detected invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ in victoria.
    Kok DL; Chang JH; Erbas B; Fletcher A; Kavanagh AM; Henderson MA; Gertig DM
    ANZ J Surg; 2006 Nov; 76(11):996-1001. PubMed ID: 17054549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Regional differences in the incidence and treatment of carcinoma in situ of the breast.
    Choi WS; Parker BA; Pierce JP; Greenberg ER
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1996 Apr; 5(4):317-20. PubMed ID: 8722225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detecting an association between socioeconomic status and late stage breast cancer using spatial analysis and area-based measures.
    MacKinnon JA; Duncan RC; Huang Y; Lee DJ; Fleming LE; Voti L; Rudolph M; Wilkinson JD
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2007 Apr; 16(4):756-62. PubMed ID: 17416767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of geography on mammography use in California.
    Jackson MC; Davis WW; Waldron W; McNeel TS; Pfeiffer R; Breen N
    Cancer Causes Control; 2009 Oct; 20(8):1339-53. PubMed ID: 19449107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In situ breast cancer: a local area analysis of Dane County, Wisconsin.
    Herzog S; Bush D; Remington P; Reeves M; Adler R
    Wis Med J; 1994 Sep; 93(9):480-2. PubMed ID: 7985390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Breast Cancer Screening, Incidence, and Mortality Across US Counties.
    Harding C; Pompei F; Burmistrov D; Welch HG; Abebe R; Wilson R
    JAMA Intern Med; 2015 Sep; 175(9):1483-9. PubMed ID: 26147578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Breast Cancer Challenges and Screening in China: Lessons From Current Registry Data and Population Screening Studies.
    Song QK; Wang XL; Zhou XN; Yang HB; Li YC; Wu JP; Ren J; Lyerly HK
    Oncologist; 2015 Jul; 20(7):773-9. PubMed ID: 26001390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Small-area incidence trends in breast cancer.
    Schootman M; Sun D
    Epidemiology; 2004 May; 15(3):300-7. PubMed ID: 15097010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Longitudinal patterns of breast cancer screening: mammography, clinical, and breast self-examinations in a rural and urban setting.
    Leung J; McKenzie S; Martin J; Dobson A; McLaughlin D
    Womens Health Issues; 2014; 24(1):e139-46. PubMed ID: 24439940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Breast cancer screening, incidence, and mortality in West Virginia.
    Khanna R; Bhanegaonkar A; Colsher P; Madhavan SS; Halverson J
    W V Med J; 2009 Oct; 105 Spec No():24-32. PubMed ID: 19999262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Urban/Rural Dichotomy in the Distribution of Breast Cancer Across Pennsylvania.
    Boukovalas S; Sariego J
    Am Surg; 2015 Sep; 81(9):884-8. PubMed ID: 26350666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.