BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16356363)

  • 1. Identifying geographic disparities in the early detection of breast cancer using a geographic information system.
    McElroy JA; Remington PL; Gangnon RE; Hariharan L; Andersen LD
    Prev Chronic Dis; 2006 Jan; 3(1):A10. PubMed ID: 16356363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detection method and breast carcinoma histology.
    Newcomer LM; Newcomb PA; Trentham-Dietz A; Storer BE; Yasui Y; Daling JR; Potter JD
    Cancer; 2002 Aug; 95(3):470-7. PubMed ID: 12209738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Incidence of and treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
    Ernster VL; Barclay J; Kerlikowske K; Grady D; Henderson C
    JAMA; 1996 Mar; 275(12):913-8. PubMed ID: 8598618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Breast cancer stage at diagnosis and geographic access to mammography screening (New Hampshire, 1998-2004).
    Celaya MO; Berke EM; Onega TL; Gui J; Riddle BL; Cherala SS; Rees JR
    Rural Remote Health; 2010; 10(2):1361. PubMed ID: 20438282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mammography screening and the increase in breast cancer incidence in Hawaii.
    Maskarinec G; Wilkens L; Meng L
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1997 Mar; 6(3):201-8. PubMed ID: 9138664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Screening caused rising incidence rates of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
    van Steenbergen LN; Voogd AC; Roukema JA; Louwman WJ; Duijm LE; Coebergh JW; van de Poll-Franse LV
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2009 May; 115(1):181-3. PubMed ID: 18516674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.
    Lynge E
    APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Community trends in the early detection of breast cancer in Wisconsin, 1980-1998.
    Andersen LD; Remington PL; Trentham-Dietz A; Robert S
    Am J Prev Med; 2004 Jan; 26(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 14700713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Contributions of the epidemiological cancer registries to the evaluation of mammography screening in Germany].
    Urbschat I; Kieschke J; Schlanstedt-Jahn U; von Gehlen S; Thiel A; Jensch P
    Gesundheitswesen; 2005 Jul; 67(7):448-54. PubMed ID: 16103967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Urban-rural differences in the management of screen-detected invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ in victoria.
    Kok DL; Chang JH; Erbas B; Fletcher A; Kavanagh AM; Henderson MA; Gertig DM
    ANZ J Surg; 2006 Nov; 76(11):996-1001. PubMed ID: 17054549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Regional differences in the incidence and treatment of carcinoma in situ of the breast.
    Choi WS; Parker BA; Pierce JP; Greenberg ER
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1996 Apr; 5(4):317-20. PubMed ID: 8722225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detecting an association between socioeconomic status and late stage breast cancer using spatial analysis and area-based measures.
    MacKinnon JA; Duncan RC; Huang Y; Lee DJ; Fleming LE; Voti L; Rudolph M; Wilkinson JD
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2007 Apr; 16(4):756-62. PubMed ID: 17416767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of geography on mammography use in California.
    Jackson MC; Davis WW; Waldron W; McNeel TS; Pfeiffer R; Breen N
    Cancer Causes Control; 2009 Oct; 20(8):1339-53. PubMed ID: 19449107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In situ breast cancer: a local area analysis of Dane County, Wisconsin.
    Herzog S; Bush D; Remington P; Reeves M; Adler R
    Wis Med J; 1994 Sep; 93(9):480-2. PubMed ID: 7985390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Breast Cancer Screening, Incidence, and Mortality Across US Counties.
    Harding C; Pompei F; Burmistrov D; Welch HG; Abebe R; Wilson R
    JAMA Intern Med; 2015 Sep; 175(9):1483-9. PubMed ID: 26147578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Breast Cancer Challenges and Screening in China: Lessons From Current Registry Data and Population Screening Studies.
    Song QK; Wang XL; Zhou XN; Yang HB; Li YC; Wu JP; Ren J; Lyerly HK
    Oncologist; 2015 Jul; 20(7):773-9. PubMed ID: 26001390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Small-area incidence trends in breast cancer.
    Schootman M; Sun D
    Epidemiology; 2004 May; 15(3):300-7. PubMed ID: 15097010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Longitudinal patterns of breast cancer screening: mammography, clinical, and breast self-examinations in a rural and urban setting.
    Leung J; McKenzie S; Martin J; Dobson A; McLaughlin D
    Womens Health Issues; 2014; 24(1):e139-46. PubMed ID: 24439940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Breast cancer screening, incidence, and mortality in West Virginia.
    Khanna R; Bhanegaonkar A; Colsher P; Madhavan SS; Halverson J
    W V Med J; 2009 Oct; 105 Spec No():24-32. PubMed ID: 19999262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Urban/Rural Dichotomy in the Distribution of Breast Cancer Across Pennsylvania.
    Boukovalas S; Sariego J
    Am Surg; 2015 Sep; 81(9):884-8. PubMed ID: 26350666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.