These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16357383)
1. Assessment of two 3D MDCT colonography protocols for observation of colorectal polyps. Yasumoto T; Murakami T; Yamamoto H; Hori M; Iannaccone R; Kim T; Abe H; Kuwabara M; Yamasaki K; Kikkawa N; Arimoto H; Passariello R; Nakamura H AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jan; 186(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 16357383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Colorectal polyps: detection with low-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography versus two sequential colonoscopies. Iannaccone R; Catalano C; Mangiapane F; Murakami T; Lamazza A; Fiori E; Schillaci A; Marin D; Nofroni I; Hori M; Passariello R Radiology; 2005 Dec; 237(3):927-37. PubMed ID: 16304113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [CT-colonography with the 16-slice CT for the diagnostic evaluation of colorectal neoplasms and inflammatory colon diseases]. Röttgen R; Schröder RJ; Lorenz M; Herbel A; Fischbach F; Herzog H; Lopez-Häninnen E; Gutberlet M; Hoffmann K; Helmig K; Felix R Rofo; 2003 Oct; 175(10):1384-91. PubMed ID: 14556108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Two- versus three-dimensional colon evaluation with recently developed virtual dissection software for CT colonography. Kim SH; Lee JM; Eun HW; Lee MW; Han JK; Lee JY; Choi BI Radiology; 2007 Sep; 244(3):852-64. PubMed ID: 17709833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computer-aided diagnosis scheme for detection of polyps at CT colonography. Yoshida H; Näppi J; MacEneaney P; Rubin DT; Dachman AH Radiographics; 2002; 22(4):963-79. PubMed ID: 12110726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-dimensional endoluminal CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy): comparison of three commercially available systems. Pickhardt PJ AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Dec; 181(6):1599-606. PubMed ID: 14627581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative performance of two polyp detection systems on CT colonography. Fletcher JG; Booya F; Summers RM; Roy D; Guendel L; Schmidt B; McCollough CH; Fidler JL AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Aug; 189(2):277-82. PubMed ID: 17646451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Colorectal neoplasms: prospective comparison of thin-section low-dose multi-detector row CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection. Macari M; Bini EJ; Xue X; Milano A; Katz SS; Resnick D; Chandarana H; Krinsky G; Klingenbeck K; Marshall CH; Megibow AJ Radiology; 2002 Aug; 224(2):383-92. PubMed ID: 12147833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Polyp detection with CT colonography: primary 3D endoluminal analysis versus primary 2D transverse analysis with computer-assisted reader software. Taylor SA; Halligan S; Slater A; Goh V; Burling DN; Roddie ME; Honeyfield L; McQuillan J; Amin H; Dehmeshki J Radiology; 2006 Jun; 239(3):759-67. PubMed ID: 16543593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Virtual colon dissection with CT colonography compared with axial interpretation and conventional colonoscopy: preliminary results. Hoppe H; Quattropani C; Spreng A; Mattich J; Netzer P; Dinkel HP AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 May; 182(5):1151-8. PubMed ID: 15100110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of a unidirectional panoramic 3D endoluminal interpretation technique to traditional 2D and bidirectional 3D interpretation techniques at CT colonography: preliminary observations. Lenhart DK; Babb J; Bonavita J; Kim D; Bini EJ; Megibow AJ; Macari M Clin Radiol; 2010 Feb; 65(2):118-25. PubMed ID: 20103433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. CT colonography using 16-MDCT in the evaluation of colorectal cancer. Chung DJ; Huh KC; Choi WJ; Kim JK AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jan; 184(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 15615957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of time-efficient CT colonography with two- and three-dimensional colonic evaluation for detecting colorectal polyps. Macari M; Milano A; Lavelle M; Berman P; Megibow AJ AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jun; 174(6):1543-9. PubMed ID: 10845478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. CT colonography: influence of 3D viewing and polyp candidate features on interpretation with computer-aided detection. Shi R; Schraedley-Desmond P; Napel S; Olcott EW; Jeffrey RB; Yee J; Zalis ME; Margolis D; Paik DS; Sherbondy AJ; Sundaram P; Beaulieu CF Radiology; 2006 Jun; 239(3):768-76. PubMed ID: 16714460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transparent rendering of intraluminal contrast for 3D polyp visualization at CT colonography. Shi R; Napel S; Rosenberg JK; Shin LK; Walsh CF; Mogensen MA; Joshi AJ; Pankhudi P; Beaulieu CF J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(5):773-9. PubMed ID: 17895791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of routine nontargeted CT without colonography technique for the detection of large colorectal polyps and cancer. Ozel B; Pickhardt PJ; Kim DH; Schumacher C; Bhargava N; Winter TC Dis Colon Rectum; 2010 Jun; 53(6):911-8. PubMed ID: 20485005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. CT colonography with computer-aided detection as a second reader: observer performance study. Petrick N; Haider M; Summers RM; Yeshwant SC; Brown L; Iuliano EM; Louie A; Choi JR; Pickhardt PJ Radiology; 2008 Jan; 246(1):148-56. PubMed ID: 18096536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Colorectal polyps and cancers in asymptomatic average-risk patients: evaluation with CT colonography. Macari M; Bini EJ; Jacobs SL; Naik S; Lui YW; Milano A; Rajapaksa R; Megibow AJ; Babb J Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):629-36. PubMed ID: 14739311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]