285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16357649)
1. Comparisons of the handheld autorefractor, table-mounted autorefractor, and subjective refraction in Singapore adults.
Farook M; Venkatramani J; Gazzard G; Cheng A; Tan D; Saw SM
Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Dec; 82(12):1066-70. PubMed ID: 16357649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cycloplegic refraction in preschool children: comparisons between the hand-held autorefractor, table-mounted autorefractor and retinoscopy.
Prabakaran S; Dirani M; Chia A; Gazzard G; Fan Q; Leo SW; Ling Y; Au Eong KG; Wong TY; Saw SM
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 Jul; 29(4):422-6. PubMed ID: 19523087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability and reproducibility of a handheld videorefractor.
Ogbuehi KC; Almaliki WH; AlQarni A; Osuagwu UL
Optom Vis Sci; 2015 May; 92(5):632-41. PubMed ID: 25822015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical Accuracy of the Nidek ARK-1 Autorefractor.
Paudel N; Adhikari S; Thakur A; Shrestha B; Loughman J
Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Jun; 96(6):407-413. PubMed ID: 31107837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy and accommodation capability of a handheld autorefractor.
Wesemann W; Dick B
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2000 Jan; 26(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 10646148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reproducibility and accuracy of measurements with a hand held autorefractor in children.
Harvey EM; Miller JM; Wagner LK; Dobson V
Br J Ophthalmol; 1997 Nov; 81(11):941-8. PubMed ID: 9505815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Accuracy of three common optometry methods in examination of refraction in juveniles].
Su T; Min X; Liu S; Li F; Tan X; Zhong Y; Deng S
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2016 Feb; 41(2):174-81. PubMed ID: 26932216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of the HARK autorefractor in children.
Isenberg SJ; Del Signore M; Madani-Becker G
Am J Ophthalmol; 2001 Apr; 131(4):438-41. PubMed ID: 11292405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Retinoscopy/autorefraction: which is the best starting point for a noncycloplegic refraction?
Jorge J; Queirós A; Almeida JB; Parafita MA
Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Jan; 82(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 15630406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of an Affordable Handheld Wavefront Autorefractor.
Rubio M; Hernández CS; Seco E; Perez-Merino P; Casares I; Dave SR; Lim D; Durr NJ; Lage E
Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Oct; 96(10):726-732. PubMed ID: 31592955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the SVOne Handheld Autorefractor in a Pediatric Population.
Rosenfield M; Ciuffreda KJ
Optom Vis Sci; 2017 Feb; 94(2):159-165. PubMed ID: 27668640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of a Smartphone-based Autorefractor Compared with Criterion-standard Refraction.
Jeganathan VSE; Valikodath N; Niziol LM; Hansen S; Apostolou H; Woodward MA
Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Dec; 95(12):1135-1141. PubMed ID: 30451804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Experiences with the hand-held autorefractometer "Retinomax" in adults and children].
Wesemann W; Dick B
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1997 Dec; 211(6):387-94. PubMed ID: 9498190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of different autorefractors with retinoscopy in children.
Oral Y; Gunaydin N; Ozgur O; Arsan AK; Oskan S
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2012; 49(6):370-7. PubMed ID: 22938517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Design and Clinical Evaluation of a Handheld Wavefront Autorefractor.
Durr NJ; Dave SR; Vera-Diaz FA; Lim D; Dorronsoro C; Marcos S; Thorn F; Lage E
Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Dec; 92(12):1140-7. PubMed ID: 26580271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The child self-refraction study results from urban Chinese children in Guangzhou.
He M; Congdon N; MacKenzie G; Zeng Y; Silver JD; Ellwein L
Ophthalmology; 2011 Jun; 118(6):1162-9. PubMed ID: 21232802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical evaluation of autorefraction and subjective refraction with and without cycloplegia in Chinese school-aged children: a cross-sectional study.
Guo R; Shi L; Xu K; Hong D
Transl Pediatr; 2022 Jun; 11(6):933-946. PubMed ID: 35800271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An alternative clinical routine for subjective refraction based on power vectors with trial frames.
María Revert A; Conversa MA; Albarrán Diego C; Micó V
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jan; 37(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 28030877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Self-assessment of refractive errors using a simple optical approach.
Leube A; Kraft C; Ohlendorf A; Wahl S
Clin Exp Optom; 2018 May; 101(3):386-391. PubMed ID: 29356102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of autorefraction in an adult Indian population.
Kumar RS; Moe CA; Kumar D; Rackenchath MV; A V SD; Nagaraj S; Wittberg DM; Stamper RL; Keenan JD
PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0251583. PubMed ID: 34010350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
