These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
44. When neonatal ICU infants participate in research: special protections for special subjects. Thomas KA Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am; 2009 Jun; 21(2):277-81. PubMed ID: 19460669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. The flip of the coin: exempt, expedited, or full IRB review? Bliss-Holtz J AACN Adv Crit Care; 2007; 18(2):213-7. PubMed ID: 17473550 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. The use of placebo and deception. Saber FA; Reece RD IRB; 1979; 1(4):4-6. PubMed ID: 11665068 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Key Information in the New Common Rule: Can It Save Research Consent? King NMP J Law Med Ethics; 2019 Jun; 47(2):203-212. PubMed ID: 31298098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Considerations of the institutional review board in artificial organ development. Bosso JA J Contemp Law; 1984; 11(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 17076041 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. [Independent ethics committees for clinical research in Argentina. An evaluation and a system to guarantee their independence]. Gonorazky SE Medicina (B Aires); 2008; 68(2):113-9. PubMed ID: 18499958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. The protection of human subjects: a reexamination of the professional code of ethics. Galliher JF Am Sociol; 1973 Aug; 8(3):93-100. PubMed ID: 11664392 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Experimentation--consent required. South Dakota S D Codif Laws S D; 1973; Section 34-23A-17 1973():. PubMed ID: 12041396 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Innovative care, medical research, and the ethics of informed consent. Choi JM; Salter SA; Kimball AB J Am Acad Dermatol; 2007 Feb; 56(2):330-2. PubMed ID: 17224375 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. When informed consent is not required in studies. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2006 Jun; 21(6):3. PubMed ID: 17111532 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Informed consent: practices and views of investigators in a multinational clinical trial. Sabik L; Pace CA; Forster-Gertner HP; Wendler D; Bebchuk JD; Tavel JA; McNay LA; Killen J; Emanuel EJ; Grady C IRB; 2005; 27(5):13-8. PubMed ID: 16425476 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. In court: the defendants must attempt to find all former research subjects. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2006 May; 21(5):8. PubMed ID: 16832917 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. IRB members and liability: an exchange of views. Robertson J; Holder AR IRB; 1980 Jan; 2(1):10-1. PubMed ID: 11661794 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Mission creep in the IRB world. Gunsalus CK; Bruner EM; Burbules NC; Dash L; Finkin M; Goldberg JP; Greenough WT; Miller GA; Pratt MG Science; 2006 Jun; 312(5779):1441. PubMed ID: 16763114 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Failure to report and provide commentary on research ethics board approval and informed consent in medical journals. Finlay KA; Fernandez CV J Med Ethics; 2008 Oct; 34(10):761-4. PubMed ID: 18827111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. How to do human-subjects research if you do not have an institutional review board. Rice TW Respir Care; 2008 Oct; 53(10):1362-7. PubMed ID: 18812001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Defendants claim that research subjects do not qualify for class action lawsuit. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2006 Feb; 21(2):8. PubMed ID: 16789310 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]