99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1636038)
1. Performance characteristics and image fidelity of gray-scale monitors.
Dwyer SJ; Stewart BK; Sayre JW; Aberle DR; Boechat MI; Honeyman JC; Boehme JM; Roehrig H; Ji TL; Blaine GJ
Radiographics; 1992 Jul; 12(4):765-72. PubMed ID: 1636038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contrast mapping and evaluation for electronic X-ray images on CRT display monitor.
Suzuki J; Furukawa I; Ono S; Kitamura M; Ando Y
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1997 Dec; 16(6):772-84. PubMed ID: 9533578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of 12-bit and 8-bit gray scale resolution in MR imaging of the CNS. An ROC analysis.
Smith HJ; Bakke SJ; Smevik B; Hald JK; Moen G; Rudenhed B; Abildgaard A
Acta Radiol; 1992 Nov; 33(6):505-11. PubMed ID: 1449870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Image calibration of laser digitizers, printers, and gray-scale displays.
Siegel EL; Templeton AW; Cook LT; Eckard DA; Harrison LA; Dwyer SJ
Radiographics; 1992 Mar; 12(2):329-35. PubMed ID: 1561421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of a flat CRT monitor for use in radiology.
Roehrig H; Krupinski EA; Furukawa T
J Digit Imaging; 2001 Sep; 14(3):142-8. PubMed ID: 11720336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Contrast information of digital imaging in laser film digitizer and display monitor.
Lo SC; Gaskill JW; Mun SK; Krasner BH
J Digit Imaging; 1990 May; 3(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 2092810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Image presentation in digital radiology: perspectives on the emerging DICOM display function standard and its application.
Blume H; Hemminger BM
Radiographics; 1997; 17(3):769-77. PubMed ID: 9153711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of a novel, high-resolution, color, AMLCD for diagnostic medical image display: luminance performance and DICOM calibration.
Averbukh AN; Channin DS; Flynn MJ
J Digit Imaging; 2003 Sep; 16(3):270-9. PubMed ID: 14669065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Practical assessment of the display performance of radiology workstations.
Thompson DP; Koller CJ; Eatough JP
Br J Radiol; 2007 Apr; 80(952):256-60. PubMed ID: 17038407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. SoftCopy Display Quality Assurance Program at Texas Children's Hospital.
Ly CK
J Digit Imaging; 2002; 15 Suppl 1():33-40. PubMed ID: 12105695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Variations in performance of LCDs are still evident after DICOM gray-scale standard display calibration.
Lowe JM; Brennan PC; Evanoff MG; McEntee MF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jul; 195(1):181-7. PubMed ID: 20566814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cathode ray tube quality control and acceptance testing program: initial results for clinical PACS displays.
Groth DS; Bernatz SN; Fetterly KA; Hangiandreou NJ
Radiographics; 2001; 21(3):719-32. PubMed ID: 11353118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of bi-level image converting methods for nuclear medicine image database stored in the IS&C magneto-optical disk.
Tsukamoto N; Ando Y; Kunieda E; Kawaguchi O; Shigematsu N; Kubo A; Arai Y
Medinfo; 1995; 8 Pt 1():442. PubMed ID: 8591224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Simple and rapid production of radiographic slides or prints using a personal computer and a laser imager.
Hiromura T; Tanabe T
Eur J Radiol; 1996 Sep; 23(2):159-61. PubMed ID: 8886730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Proposal of a quality-index or metric for soft copy display systems: contrast sensitivity study.
Wang J; Compton K; Peng Q
J Digit Imaging; 2003 Jun; 16(2):185-202. PubMed ID: 12964056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Image quality assurance of soft copy display systems.
Seto E; Ursani A; Cafazzo JA; Rossos PG; Easty AC
J Digit Imaging; 2005 Dec; 18(4):280-6. PubMed ID: 15988625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Soft-copy quality control of digital spot images obtained by using X-ray image intensifiers.
Peter MB; Pavlicek W; Owen JM
Radiology; 2000 Sep; 216(3):810-9. PubMed ID: 10966716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An interactive method of assessing the characteristics of softcopy display using observer performance tests.
Wang J; Peng Q
J Digit Imaging; 2002; 15 Suppl 1():216-8. PubMed ID: 12105732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Medical imaging displays and their use in image interpretation.
Kagadis GC; Walz-Flannigan A; Krupinski EA; Nagy PG; Katsanos K; Diamantopoulos A; Langer SG
Radiographics; 2013; 33(1):275-90. PubMed ID: 23322841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Electronic imaging workstations: ergonomic issues and the user interface.
Horii SC
Radiographics; 1992 Jul; 12(4):773-87. PubMed ID: 1636039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
