These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16360432)

  • 1. Optimal frequency in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: prospective randomized study.
    Yilmaz E; Batislam E; Basar M; Tuglu D; Mert C; Basar H
    Urology; 2005 Dec; 66(6):1160-4. PubMed ID: 16360432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does rate matter? The results of a randomized controlled trial of 60 versus 120 shocks per minute for shock wave lithotripsy of renal calculi.
    Davenport K; Minervini A; Keoghane S; Parkin J; Keeley FX; Timoney AG
    J Urol; 2006 Nov; 176(5):2055-8; discussion 2058. PubMed ID: 17070254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can Phyllanthus niruri affect the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal stones? A randomized, prospective, long-term study.
    Micali S; Sighinolfi MC; Celia A; De Stefani S; Grande M; Cicero AF; Bianchi G
    J Urol; 2006 Sep; 176(3):1020-2. PubMed ID: 16890682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Shock wave lithotripsy at 60 or 120 shocks per minute: a randomized, double-blind trial.
    Pace KT; Ghiculete D; Harju M; Honey RJ;
    J Urol; 2005 Aug; 174(2):595-9. PubMed ID: 16006908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A prospective, randomized study of the clinical effects of shock wave delivery for unilateral kidney stones: 60 versus 120 shocks per minute.
    Ng CF; Lo AK; Lee KW; Wong KT; Chung WY; Gohel D
    J Urol; 2012 Sep; 188(3):837-42. PubMed ID: 22819406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A randomized, double-blind trial to compare shock wave frequencies of 60 and 120 shocks per minute for upper ureteral stones.
    Honey RJ; Schuler TD; Ghiculete D; Pace KT;
    J Urol; 2009 Oct; 182(4):1418-23. PubMed ID: 19683303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical predictors of stone fragmentation using slow-rate shock wave lithotripsy.
    Li WM; Wu WJ; Chou YH; Liu CC; Wang CJ; Huang CH; Lee YC
    Urol Int; 2007; 79(2):124-8. PubMed ID: 17851280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Preoperative nomograms for predicting stone-free rate after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
    Kanao K; Nakashima J; Nakagawa K; Asakura H; Miyajima A; Oya M; Ohigashi T; Murai M
    J Urol; 2006 Oct; 176(4 Pt 1):1453-6; discussion 1456-7. PubMed ID: 16952658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Slow versus fast shock wave lithotripsy rate for urolithiasis: a prospective randomized study.
    Madbouly K; El-Tiraifi AM; Seida M; El-Faqih SR; Atassi R; Talic RF
    J Urol; 2005 Jan; 173(1):127-30. PubMed ID: 15592053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does a slower treatment rate impact the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for solitary kidney or ureteral stones?
    Chacko J; Moore M; Sankey N; Chandhoke PS
    J Urol; 2006 Apr; 175(4):1370-3; discussion 1373-4. PubMed ID: 16515999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is there a role for tamsulosin in shock wave lithotripsy for renal and ureteral calculi?
    Bhagat SK; Chacko NK; Kekre NS; Gopalakrishnan G; Antonisamy B; Devasia A
    J Urol; 2007 Jun; 177(6):2185-8. PubMed ID: 17509314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can prilocaine infiltration alone be the most minimally invasive approach in terms of anesthesia during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy?
    Yilmaz E; Batislam E; Basar M; Tuglu D; Yuvanc E
    Urology; 2006 Jul; 68(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 16806420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tamsulosin treatment increases clinical success rate of single extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of renal stones.
    Gravina GL; Costa AM; Ronchi P; Galatioto GP; Angelucci A; Castellani D; Narcisi F; Vicentini C
    Urology; 2005 Jul; 66(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 15992885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of three analgesic treatment protocols for pain management during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
    Eryildirim B; Kuyumcuoğlu U; Tarhan F; Faydaci G; Uruç F
    Urol Int; 2009; 82(3):276-9. PubMed ID: 19440013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A new transportable shock-wave lithotripsy machine for managing urinary stones: a single-centre experience with a dual-focus lithotripter.
    De Sio M; Autorino R; Quarto G; Mordente S; Giugliano F; Di Giacomo F; Neri F; Quattrone C; Sorrentino D; De Domenico R; D'Armiento M
    BJU Int; 2007 Nov; 100(5):1137-41. PubMed ID: 17550410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in children: equivalent clearance rates to adults is achieved with fewer and lower energy shock waves.
    Kurien A; Symons S; Manohar T; Desai M
    BJU Int; 2009 Jan; 103(1):81-4. PubMed ID: 18727616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does degree of hydronephrosis affect success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for distal ureteral stones?
    el-Assmy A; el-Nahas AR; Youssef RF; el-Hefnawy AS; Sheir KZ
    Urology; 2007 Mar; 69(3):431-5. PubMed ID: 17382137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inversion, hydration and diuresis during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: does it improve the stone-free rate for lower pole stone clearance?
    Albanis S; Ather HM; Papatsoris AG; Masood J; Staios D; Sheikh T; Akhtar S; Buchholz N
    Urol Int; 2009; 83(2):211-6. PubMed ID: 19752619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Slow vs rapid delivery rate shock wave lithotripsy for pediatric renal urolithiasis: a prospective randomized study.
    Salem HK; Fathy H; Elfayoumy H; Aly H; Ghonium A; Mohsen MA; Hegazy Ael R
    J Urol; 2014 May; 191(5):1370-4. PubMed ID: 24262496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Shock wave lithotripsy in patients with renal calculi.
    Tayib AM; Mosli HA; Farsi HM; Atwa MA; Saada HA
    Saudi Med J; 2008 Aug; 29(8):1180-3. PubMed ID: 18690315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.