306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16360432)
1. Optimal frequency in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: prospective randomized study.
Yilmaz E; Batislam E; Basar M; Tuglu D; Mert C; Basar H
Urology; 2005 Dec; 66(6):1160-4. PubMed ID: 16360432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does rate matter? The results of a randomized controlled trial of 60 versus 120 shocks per minute for shock wave lithotripsy of renal calculi.
Davenport K; Minervini A; Keoghane S; Parkin J; Keeley FX; Timoney AG
J Urol; 2006 Nov; 176(5):2055-8; discussion 2058. PubMed ID: 17070254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can Phyllanthus niruri affect the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal stones? A randomized, prospective, long-term study.
Micali S; Sighinolfi MC; Celia A; De Stefani S; Grande M; Cicero AF; Bianchi G
J Urol; 2006 Sep; 176(3):1020-2. PubMed ID: 16890682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Shock wave lithotripsy at 60 or 120 shocks per minute: a randomized, double-blind trial.
Pace KT; Ghiculete D; Harju M; Honey RJ;
J Urol; 2005 Aug; 174(2):595-9. PubMed ID: 16006908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A prospective, randomized study of the clinical effects of shock wave delivery for unilateral kidney stones: 60 versus 120 shocks per minute.
Ng CF; Lo AK; Lee KW; Wong KT; Chung WY; Gohel D
J Urol; 2012 Sep; 188(3):837-42. PubMed ID: 22819406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A randomized, double-blind trial to compare shock wave frequencies of 60 and 120 shocks per minute for upper ureteral stones.
Honey RJ; Schuler TD; Ghiculete D; Pace KT;
J Urol; 2009 Oct; 182(4):1418-23. PubMed ID: 19683303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical predictors of stone fragmentation using slow-rate shock wave lithotripsy.
Li WM; Wu WJ; Chou YH; Liu CC; Wang CJ; Huang CH; Lee YC
Urol Int; 2007; 79(2):124-8. PubMed ID: 17851280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Preoperative nomograms for predicting stone-free rate after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
Kanao K; Nakashima J; Nakagawa K; Asakura H; Miyajima A; Oya M; Ohigashi T; Murai M
J Urol; 2006 Oct; 176(4 Pt 1):1453-6; discussion 1456-7. PubMed ID: 16952658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Slow versus fast shock wave lithotripsy rate for urolithiasis: a prospective randomized study.
Madbouly K; El-Tiraifi AM; Seida M; El-Faqih SR; Atassi R; Talic RF
J Urol; 2005 Jan; 173(1):127-30. PubMed ID: 15592053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does a slower treatment rate impact the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for solitary kidney or ureteral stones?
Chacko J; Moore M; Sankey N; Chandhoke PS
J Urol; 2006 Apr; 175(4):1370-3; discussion 1373-4. PubMed ID: 16515999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is there a role for tamsulosin in shock wave lithotripsy for renal and ureteral calculi?
Bhagat SK; Chacko NK; Kekre NS; Gopalakrishnan G; Antonisamy B; Devasia A
J Urol; 2007 Jun; 177(6):2185-8. PubMed ID: 17509314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can prilocaine infiltration alone be the most minimally invasive approach in terms of anesthesia during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy?
Yilmaz E; Batislam E; Basar M; Tuglu D; Yuvanc E
Urology; 2006 Jul; 68(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 16806420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tamsulosin treatment increases clinical success rate of single extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of renal stones.
Gravina GL; Costa AM; Ronchi P; Galatioto GP; Angelucci A; Castellani D; Narcisi F; Vicentini C
Urology; 2005 Jul; 66(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 15992885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of three analgesic treatment protocols for pain management during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
Eryildirim B; Kuyumcuoğlu U; Tarhan F; Faydaci G; Uruç F
Urol Int; 2009; 82(3):276-9. PubMed ID: 19440013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A new transportable shock-wave lithotripsy machine for managing urinary stones: a single-centre experience with a dual-focus lithotripter.
De Sio M; Autorino R; Quarto G; Mordente S; Giugliano F; Di Giacomo F; Neri F; Quattrone C; Sorrentino D; De Domenico R; D'Armiento M
BJU Int; 2007 Nov; 100(5):1137-41. PubMed ID: 17550410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in children: equivalent clearance rates to adults is achieved with fewer and lower energy shock waves.
Kurien A; Symons S; Manohar T; Desai M
BJU Int; 2009 Jan; 103(1):81-4. PubMed ID: 18727616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does degree of hydronephrosis affect success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for distal ureteral stones?
el-Assmy A; el-Nahas AR; Youssef RF; el-Hefnawy AS; Sheir KZ
Urology; 2007 Mar; 69(3):431-5. PubMed ID: 17382137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inversion, hydration and diuresis during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: does it improve the stone-free rate for lower pole stone clearance?
Albanis S; Ather HM; Papatsoris AG; Masood J; Staios D; Sheikh T; Akhtar S; Buchholz N
Urol Int; 2009; 83(2):211-6. PubMed ID: 19752619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Slow vs rapid delivery rate shock wave lithotripsy for pediatric renal urolithiasis: a prospective randomized study.
Salem HK; Fathy H; Elfayoumy H; Aly H; Ghonium A; Mohsen MA; Hegazy Ael R
J Urol; 2014 May; 191(5):1370-4. PubMed ID: 24262496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Shock wave lithotripsy in patients with renal calculi.
Tayib AM; Mosli HA; Farsi HM; Atwa MA; Saada HA
Saudi Med J; 2008 Aug; 29(8):1180-3. PubMed ID: 18690315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
