These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16360848)

  • 21. Influence of inorganic filler content on the radiopacity of dental resin cements.
    Furtos G; Baldea B; Silaghi-Dumitrescu L; Moldovan M; Prejmerean C; Nica L
    Dent Mater J; 2012; 31(2):266-72. PubMed ID: 22447061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of the Radiopacities of Bulk-fill Restoratives Using Two Digital Radiography Systems.
    Yasa E; Yasa B; Aglarci OS; Ertas ET
    Oper Dent; 2015; 40(5):E197-205. PubMed ID: 26237642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of conventional and digital radiography for radiometric differentiation of dental cements.
    Baksi BG; Ermis RB
    Quintessence Int; 2007 Oct; 38(9):e532-6. PubMed ID: 17873973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Radiopacity of Nonmetallic CAD/CAM Restorative Blocks.
    Hosney S; Kandil M; El-Mowafy O
    Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(3):271-3. PubMed ID: 27148988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of the radiopacity of restorative materials with different structures and thicknesses using a digital radiography system.
    Yaylacı A; Karaarslan ES; Hatırlı H
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2021 Sep; 51(3):261-269. PubMed ID: 34621653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An investigation of the radiopacity of composite restorative materials.
    Cook WD
    Aust Dent J; 1981 Apr; 26(2):105-12. PubMed ID: 6941760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparative study between the radiopacity levels of high viscosity and of flowable composite resins, using digital imaging.
    Arita ES; Silveira GP; Cortes AR; Brucoli HC
    Eur J Esthet Dent; 2012; 7(4):430-8. PubMed ID: 23150871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Is digital better in dental radiography?
    Zdesar U; Fortuna T; Valantic B; Skrk D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):138-9. PubMed ID: 18375462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of selected properties of mineral trioxide aggregate sealer cement.
    Camilleri J
    J Endod; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1412-7. PubMed ID: 19801242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Radiopacity Measurement of Restorative Resins Using Film and Three Digital Systems for Comparison with ISO 4049: International Standard.
    Kapila R; Matsuda Y; Araki K; Okano T; Nishikawa K; Sano T
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2015; 56(4):207-14. PubMed ID: 26657519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Comparative study on radio-opacity of dental composite resin materials'determination using film imaging and digital imaging].
    Li Y; Lin H; Zhang TJ
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2021 Oct; 53(5):995-1001. PubMed ID: 34650308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Differences in aluminum equivalent values of endodontic sealers: conventional versus digital radiography.
    Baksi BG; Sen BH; Eyuboglu TF
    J Endod; 2008 Sep; 34(9):1101-4. PubMed ID: 18718374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Analysis of the reproducibility of the gray values and noise of a direct digital radiography system.
    Poleti ML; Fernandes TM; Teixeira RC; Capelozza AL; Rubira-Bullen IR
    Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():. PubMed ID: 26017488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Optimum exposure ranges for computed dental radiography.
    Hayakawa Y; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Kuroyanagi K; Rumack PM; Schick DB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Apr; 25(2):71-5. PubMed ID: 9446976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparative study of the radiopacity of resin cements used in aesthetic dentistry.
    Montes-Fariza R; Monterde-Hernández M; Cabanillas-Casabella C; Pallares-Sabater A
    J Adv Prosthodont; 2016 Jun; 8(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 27350854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Radiopacity of contemporary luting cements using conventional and digital radiography.
    An SY; An CH; Choi KS; Huh KH; Yi WJ; Heo MS; Lee SS; Choi SC
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2018 Jun; 48(2):97-101. PubMed ID: 29963480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4645-70. PubMed ID: 19590115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of conventional and digital radiography capacities for distinguishing dental materials on radiograms depending on the present radiopacifying agent.
    Antonijević D; Ilić D; Medić V; Dodić S; Obradović-Djuriĉić K; Rakoĉević Z
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2014 Nov; 71(11):1006-12. PubMed ID: 25536802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. In vitro radiographic detection of cement overhangs on cement-retained implant restorations.
    Antonijevic D; Obradovic-Djuricic K; Rakocevic Z; Medigovic I
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(4):1068-75. PubMed ID: 23869365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. How does duration of curing affect the radiopacity of dental materials?
    Poorsattar Bejeh Mir A; Poorsattar Bejeh Mir M
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2012 Jun; 42(2):89-93. PubMed ID: 22783477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.