These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
800 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16360860)
21. Severe Class II malocclusion with facial asymmetry treated with intraoral vertico-sagittal ramus osteotomy and LeFort I osteotomy. Kuroda S; Murakami K; Morishige Y; Takano-Yamamoto T Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):809-19. PubMed ID: 19524842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Inferior positioning of the maxilla by a Le Fort I osteotomy: a review of 25 patients with vertical maxillary deficiency. de Mol van Otterloo JJ; Tuinzing DB; Kostense P J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 1996 Apr; 24(2):69-77. PubMed ID: 8773886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Assessment of the relationship between the recovery of maximum mandibular opening and the maxillomandibular fixation period after orthognathic surgery. Ueki K; Marukawa K; Hashiba Y; Nakagawa K; Degerliyurt K; Yamamoto E J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Mar; 66(3):486-91. PubMed ID: 18280381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The stability of bilateral sagittal ramus osteotomy and vertical ramus osteotomy after bimaxillary correction of class III malocclusion. Abeltins A; Jakobsone G; Urtane I; Bigestans A J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2011 Dec; 39(8):583-7. PubMed ID: 21334219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Stability of skeletal Class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures: titanium versus resorbable plates and screws for maxillary fixation. Costa F; Robiony M; Zorzan E; Zerman N; Politi M J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Apr; 64(4):642-51. PubMed ID: 16546644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Skeletal stability and condylar position related to fixation method following mandibular setback with bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Roh YC; Shin SH; Kim SS; Sandor GK; Kim YD J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1958-63. PubMed ID: 25441865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparative study of skeletal stability between bicortical resorbable and titanium screw fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathism. Paeng JY; Hong J; Kim CS; Kim MJ J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):660-4. PubMed ID: 22209495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The assessment of blood loss in orthognathic surgery for prognathia. Ueki K; Marukawa K; Shimada M; Nakagawa K; Yamamoto E J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Mar; 63(3):350-4. PubMed ID: 15742286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Postoperative stability following maxillary downward movement with Le Fort I inclined osteotomy at the lateral nasal cavity wall. Yang HJ; Hwang SJ J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):793-8. PubMed ID: 22429608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Bone healing after Le Fort I osteotomy with SSRO, using uHA/PLLA plates and screws, in class II and III patients. Ueki K; Yoshizawa K; Moroi A J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Sep; 47(9):1338-1342. PubMed ID: 31337568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Le Fort I miniplate osteosynthesis: a randomized, prospective study comparing resorbable PLLA/PGA with titanium. Norholt SE; Pedersen TK; Jensen J Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Apr; 33(3):245-52. PubMed ID: 15287307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Modification of the sagittal split osteotomy of the mandibular ramus: mobilizing vertical osteotomy of the internal ramus segment. Ricard D; Ferri J J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1691-9. PubMed ID: 19615584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Stability of maxillary advancement using rigid fixation and porous-block hydroxyapatite grafting: cleft palate versus non-cleft patients. Mehra P; Wolford LM; Hopkin JK; Castro V; Frietas R Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2001; 16(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 12387610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Stability of maxillary position after Le Fort I osteotomy using self-reinforced biodegradable poly-70L/30DL-lactide miniplates and screws. Kim BC; Padwa BL; Park HS; Jung YS J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 May; 69(5):1442-6. PubMed ID: 21195522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluation of upper lip hypoesthesia with a trigeminal somatosensory-evoked potential following Le Fort I osteotomy in combination with mandibular osteotomy. Ueki K; Nakagawa K; Marukawa K; Shimada M; Yoshida K; Hashiba Y; Shimizu C; Yamamoto E Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Feb; 103(2):169-74. PubMed ID: 17234530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Contributing factors to intraoperative clockwise rotation of the proximal segment as a relapse factor after mandibular setback with sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Yang HJ; Hwang SJ J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jun; 42(4):e57-63. PubMed ID: 23830770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Le Fort I osteotomy using an ultrasonic bone curette to fracture the pterygoid plates. Ueki K; Nakagawa K; Marukawa K; Yamamoto E J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2004 Dec; 32(6):381-6. PubMed ID: 15555522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison study of the Le Fort I osteotomy using 2- and 4-plate fixation. Fujio M; Sayo A; Ogisu K; Chang Q; Tsuboi M; Hibi H Nagoya J Med Sci; 2023 Feb; 85(1):70-78. PubMed ID: 36923624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Non-union of the maxilla: a rare complication after Le Fort I osteotomy]. Imholz B; Richter M; Dojcinovic I; Hugentobler M Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2010; 111(5-6):270-5. PubMed ID: 21112600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Condylar and disc positions after sagittal split ramus osteotomy with and without Le Fort I osteotomy. Ueki K; Marukawa K; Shimada M; Hashiba Y; Nakgawa K; Yamamoto E Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Mar; 103(3):342-8. PubMed ID: 17321444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]