These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

613 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16360907)

  • 1. A comparison of providers' and consumers' perceptions of facial-profile attractiveness.
    Maple JR; Vig KW; Beck FM; Larsen PE; Shanker S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):690-6; quiz 801. PubMed ID: 16360907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of facial attractiveness from end-of-treatment facial photographs.
    Shafiee R; Korn EL; Pearson H; Boyd RL; Baumrind S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):500-8. PubMed ID: 18405813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of mandibular prominence on facial attractiveness.
    Johnston C; Hunt O; Burden D; Stevenson M; Hepper P
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Apr; 27(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 15817618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perception of facial profile attractiveness of different antero-posterior and vertical proportions.
    Abu Arqoub SH; Al-Khateeb SN
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):103-11. PubMed ID: 20558590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceptions of facial aesthetics in two and three dimensions.
    Todd SA; Hammond P; Hutton T; Cochrane S; Cunningham S
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Aug; 27(4):363-9. PubMed ID: 15961568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of the perception of facial profile by the general public and 3 groups of clinicians.
    Cochrane SM; Cunningham SJ; Hunt NP
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1999; 14(4):291-5. PubMed ID: 10895644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ranking facial attractiveness.
    Knight H; Keith O
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Aug; 27(4):340-8. PubMed ID: 16043472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attractiveness of facial profiles as rated by individuals with different levels of education.
    Hönn M; Dietz K; Eiselt ML; Göz G
    J Orofac Orthop; 2008 Jan; 69(1):20-30. PubMed ID: 18213458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Orthodontists' and laypersons' aesthetic assessment of Class III subjects referred for orthognathic surgery.
    Fabré M; Mossaz C; Christou P; Kiliaridis S
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):443-8. PubMed ID: 19395371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Esthetic preferences of orthodontists, oral surgeons, and laypersons for Persian facial profiles.
    Imani MM; Sanei E; Niaki EA; Shahroudi AS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Sep; 154(3):412-420. PubMed ID: 30173845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceived relative attractiveness of facial profiles with varying degrees of skeletal anomalies.
    Hönn M; Dietz K; Godt A; Göz G
    J Orofac Orthop; 2005 May; 66(3):187-96. PubMed ID: 15959632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of lower face vertical proportion on facial attractiveness.
    Johnston DJ; Hunt O; Johnston CD; Burden DJ; Stevenson M; Hepper P
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Aug; 27(4):349-54. PubMed ID: 15961569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cephalometric measures as indicators of facial attractiveness.
    Tulloch C; Phillips C; Dann C
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1993; 8(3):171-9. PubMed ID: 8301165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of dental asymmetries on the perception of smile esthetics.
    Pinho S; Ciriaco C; Faber J; Lenza MA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Dec; 132(6):748-53. PubMed ID: 18068592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of computer-aided anteroposterior maxillary incisor movement on ratings of facial attractiveness.
    Schlosser JB; Preston CB; Lampasso J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jan; 127(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 15643410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characterization of posed smile by using visual analog scale, smile arc, buccal corridor measures, and modified smile index.
    Krishnan V; Daniel ST; Lazar D; Asok A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):515-23. PubMed ID: 18405815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of orthodontic treatment need: a comparison of study models and facial photographs.
    Sherlock JM; Cobourne MT; McDonald F
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 36(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 18205636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative study of 2 software programs for predicting profile changes in Class III patients having double-jaw orthognathic surgery.
    Magro-Filho O; Magro-Ernica N; Queiroz TP; Aranega AM; Garcia IR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):452.e1-5; discussion 452-3. PubMed ID: 20362896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Significance of the soft tissue profile on facial esthetics.
    Spyropoulos MN; Halazonetis DJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 May; 119(5):464-71. PubMed ID: 11343017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Correlations between cephalometric and photographic measurements of facial attractiveness in Chinese and US patients after orthodontic treatment.
    Oh HS; Korn EL; Zhang X; Liu Y; Xu T; Boyd R; Baumrind S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):762.e1-14; discussion 762-3. PubMed ID: 19962590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.