BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16361270)

  • 1. Automatic assessment of alignment quality.
    Lassmann T; Sonnhammer EL
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2005; 33(22):7120-8. PubMed ID: 16361270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automatic extraction of reliable regions from multiple sequence alignments.
    Lassmann T; Sonnhammer EL
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 May; 8 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S9. PubMed ID: 17570868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. OXBench: a benchmark for evaluation of protein multiple sequence alignment accuracy.
    Raghava GP; Searle SM; Audley PC; Barber JD; Barton GJ
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2003 Oct; 4():47. PubMed ID: 14552658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Kalign, Kalignvu and Mumsa: web servers for multiple sequence alignment.
    Lassmann T; Sonnhammer EL
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2006 Jul; 34(Web Server issue):W596-9. PubMed ID: 16845078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Local reliability measures from sets of co-optimal multiple sequence alignments.
    Landan G; Graur D
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 2008; ():15-24. PubMed ID: 18229673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of scoring functions for protein sequence profile alignment.
    Edgar RC; Sjölander K
    Bioinformatics; 2004 May; 20(8):1301-8. PubMed ID: 14962936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. SATe-II: very fast and accurate simultaneous estimation of multiple sequence alignments and phylogenetic trees.
    Liu K; Warnow TJ; Holder MT; Nelesen SM; Yu J; Stamatakis AP; Linder CR
    Syst Biol; 2012 Jan; 61(1):90-106. PubMed ID: 22139466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Heads or tails: a simple reliability check for multiple sequence alignments.
    Landan G; Graur D
    Mol Biol Evol; 2007 Jun; 24(6):1380-3. PubMed ID: 17387100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Structure-based evaluation of sequence comparison and fold recognition alignment accuracy.
    Domingues FS; Lackner P; Andreeva A; Sippl MJ
    J Mol Biol; 2000 Apr; 297(4):1003-13. PubMed ID: 10736233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Model-based prediction of sequence alignment quality.
    Ahola V; Aittokallio T; Vihinen M; Uusipaikka E
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Oct; 24(19):2165-71. PubMed ID: 18678587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Refining multiple sequence alignments with conserved core regions.
    Chakrabarti S; Lanczycki CJ; Panchenko AR; Przytycka TM; Thiessen PA; Bryant SH
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2006; 34(9):2598-606. PubMed ID: 16707662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. From analysis of protein structural alignments toward a novel approach to align protein sequences.
    Sunyaev SR; Bogopolsky GA; Oleynikova NV; Vlasov PK; Finkelstein AV; Roytberg MA
    Proteins; 2004 Feb; 54(3):569-82. PubMed ID: 14748004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Significant improvement in accuracy of multiple protein sequence alignments by iterative refinement as assessed by reference to structural alignments.
    Gotoh O
    J Mol Biol; 1996 Dec; 264(4):823-38. PubMed ID: 8980688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. transAlign: using amino acids to facilitate the multiple alignment of protein-coding DNA sequences.
    Bininda-Emonds OR
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Jun; 6():156. PubMed ID: 15969769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multiple alignment of protein sequences with repeats and rearrangements.
    Phuong TM; Do CB; Edgar RC; Batzoglou S
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2006; 34(20):5932-42. PubMed ID: 17068081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. BAliBASE 3.0: latest developments of the multiple sequence alignment benchmark.
    Thompson JD; Koehl P; Ripp R; Poch O
    Proteins; 2005 Oct; 61(1):127-36. PubMed ID: 16044462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Compression-based classification of biological sequences and structures via the Universal Similarity Metric: experimental assessment.
    Ferragina P; Giancarlo R; Greco V; Manzini G; Valiente G
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Jul; 8():252. PubMed ID: 17629909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis and prediction of functional sub-types from protein sequence alignments.
    Hannenhalli SS; Russell RB
    J Mol Biol; 2000 Oct; 303(1):61-76. PubMed ID: 11021970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Statistics of local multiple alignments.
    Prakash A; Tompa M
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jun; 21 Suppl 1():i344-50. PubMed ID: 15961477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Objective functions.
    Doğan H; Otu HH
    Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1079():45-58. PubMed ID: 24170394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.