453 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16361671)
1. Topography of the frequency doubling perimetry visual field compared with that of short wavelength and achromatic automated perimetry visual fields.
Landers J; Sharma A; Goldberg I; Graham S
Br J Ophthalmol; 2006 Jan; 90(1):70-4. PubMed ID: 16361671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detection of early visual field loss in glaucoma using frequency-doubling perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry.
Landers JA; Goldberg I; Graham SL
Arch Ophthalmol; 2003 Dec; 121(12):1705-10. PubMed ID: 14662589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of standard automated perimetry, frequency-doubling technology perimetry, and short-wavelength automated perimetry for detection of glaucoma.
Liu S; Lam S; Weinreb RN; Ye C; Cheung CY; Lai G; Lam DS; Leung CK
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Sep; 52(10):7325-31. PubMed ID: 21810975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Frequency doubling perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry to detect early glaucoma.
Leeprechanon N; Giaconi JA; Manassakorn A; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
Ophthalmology; 2007 May; 114(5):931-7. PubMed ID: 17397926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of short wavelength automated perimetry with frequency doubling perimetry for the early detection of visual field loss in ocular hypertension.
Landers J; Goldberg I; Graham S
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2000 Aug; 28(4):248-52. PubMed ID: 11021551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of clinical optic disc assessment with tests of early visual field loss.
Landers JA; Goldberg I; Graham SL
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Oct; 30(5):338-42. PubMed ID: 12213157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Prospective randomized comparative study of frequency doubling perimetry vs standard automated perimetry in patients with glaucoma].
Kampmeier J; Eisert B; Buchwald HJ; Lang GK; Lang GE
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2001 Mar; 218(3):157-67. PubMed ID: 11322052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [A comparative analysis of standard automated perimetry and short wavelength automated perimetry in early diagnosis of glaucoma].
Chiseliţă D; Crenguţa MI; Danielescu C; Mihaela NM
Oftalmologia; 2006; 50(2):94-102. PubMed ID: 16927766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of diagnostic protocols for interpretation of frequency doubling perimetry visual fields in glaucoma.
Landers J; Sharma A; Goldberg I; Graham S
J Glaucoma; 2006 Aug; 15(4):310-4. PubMed ID: 16865008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Visual function-specific perimetry for indirect comparison of different ganglion cell populations in glaucoma.
Sample PA; Bosworth CF; Blumenthal EZ; Girkin C; Weinreb RN
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jun; 41(7):1783-90. PubMed ID: 10845599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [The value of frequency doubling perimetry in glaucoma screening of aged 40 or more population].
Li JJ; Xu L; Zhang RX; Sun XY; Yang H; Zou Y; Zhao JL
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Mar; 41(3):221-5. PubMed ID: 15840362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Short wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP) in ophthalmic practice.
Demirel S; Johnson CA
J Am Optom Assoc; 1996 Aug; 67(8):451-6. PubMed ID: 8888875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma.
Leeprechanon N; Giangiacomo A; Fontana H; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):263-271. PubMed ID: 17178091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Short-wavelength automated perimetry and motion automated perimetry in patients with glaucoma.
Sample PA; Bosworth CF; Weinreb RN
Arch Ophthalmol; 1997 Sep; 115(9):1129-33. PubMed ID: 9298053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Can frequency-doubling technology and short-wavelength automated perimetries detect visual field defects before standard automated perimetry in patients with preperimetric glaucoma?
Ferreras A; Polo V; Larrosa JM; Pablo LE; Pajarin AB; Pueyo V; Honrubia FM
J Glaucoma; 2007; 16(4):372-83. PubMed ID: 17571000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic sensitivity of fast blue-yellow and standard automated perimetry in early glaucoma: a comparison between different test programs.
Bengtsson B; Heijl A
Ophthalmology; 2006 Jul; 113(7):1092-7. PubMed ID: 16815399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of standard white-on-white automated perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry in early glaucoma patients.
Su WW; Wu SC; Chang SH; Shen SC
Chang Gung Med J; 2004 Mar; 27(3):188-92. PubMed ID: 15148996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Contrasting blue-on-yellow with white-on-white visual fields: Roles of visual adaptation for healthy peri- or postmenopausal women younger than 70 years of age.
Eisner A; Toomey MD; Incognito LJ; O'malley JP; Samples JR
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Dec; 47(12):5605-14. PubMed ID: 17122155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Isolation of short-wavelength sensitive mechanisms in normal and glaucomatous visual field regions.
Demirel S; Johnson CA
J Glaucoma; 2000 Feb; 9(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 10708234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The ability of short-wavelength automated perimetry to predict conversion to glaucoma.
van der Schoot J; Reus NJ; Colen TP; Lemij HG
Ophthalmology; 2010 Jan; 117(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 19896194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
