93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16363059)
1. Efficacy of a cochlear implant simultaneous analog stimulation strategy coupled with a monopolar electrode configuration.
Xu L; Zwolan TA; Thompson CS; Pfingst BE
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2005 Nov; 114(11):886-93. PubMed ID: 16363059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of continuous interleaved sampling and simultaneous analog stimulation speech processing strategies in newly implanted adults with a Clarion 1.2 cochlear implant.
Zwolan TA; Kileny PR; Smith S; Waltzman S; Chute P; Domico E; Firszt J; Hodges A; Mills D; Whearty M; Osberger MJ; Fisher L
Otol Neurotol; 2005 May; 26(3):455-65. PubMed ID: 15891649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of speech processing strategies used in the Clarion implant processor.
Loizou PC; Stickney G; Mishra L; Assmann P
Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 12598809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of electrode configuration and place of stimulation on speech perception with cochlear prostheses.
Pfingst BE; Franck KH; Xu L; Bauer EM; Zwolan TA
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2001 Jun; 2(2):87-103. PubMed ID: 11550528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Nucleus 24 advanced encoder conversion study: performance versus preference.
Skinner MW; Arndt PL; Staller SJ
Ear Hear; 2002 Feb; 23(1 Suppl):2S-17S. PubMed ID: 11883765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Mandarin tone and speech perception between advanced combination encoder and continuous interleaved sampling speech-processing strategies in children.
Hwang CF; Chen HC; Yang CH; Peng JP; Weng CH
Am J Otolaryngol; 2012; 33(3):338-44. PubMed ID: 21982716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Spectral and temporal cues in cochlear implant speech perception.
Nie K; Barco A; Zeng FG
Ear Hear; 2006 Apr; 27(2):208-17. PubMed ID: 16518146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of electrode design and configuration on channel interactions.
Stickney GS; Loizou PC; Mishra LN; Assmann PF; Shannon RV; Opie JM
Hear Res; 2006 Jan; 211(1-2):33-45. PubMed ID: 16338109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Dynamically Focusing Cochlear Implant Strategy Can Improve Vowel Identification in Noise.
Arenberg JG; Parkinson WS; Litvak L; Chen C; Kreft HA; Oxenham AJ
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(6):1136-1145. PubMed ID: 29529006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Simultaneous Analog Stimulation (SAS)--Continuous Interleaved Sampler (CIS) pilot comparison study in Europe.
Battmer RD; Zilberman Y; Haake P; Lenarz T
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1999 Apr; 177():69-73. PubMed ID: 10214805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Speech recognition with the nucleus 24 SPEAK, ACE, and CIS speech coding strategies in newly implanted adults.
Skinner MW; Holden LK; Whitford LA; Plant KL; Psarros C; Holden TA
Ear Hear; 2002 Jun; 23(3):207-23. PubMed ID: 12072613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Speech perception with mono- and quadrupolar electrode configurations: a crossover study.
Mens LH; Berenstein CK
Otol Neurotol; 2005 Sep; 26(5):957-64. PubMed ID: 16151343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. SAS-CIS preference study in postlingually deafened adults implanted with the CLARION cochlear implant.
Osberger MJ; Fisher L
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1999 Apr; 177():74-9. PubMed ID: 10214806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: coding of stimulus channel and current level.
Middlebrooks JC; Bierer JA
J Neurophysiol; 2002 Jan; 87(1):493-507. PubMed ID: 11784765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of presentation level on phoneme and sentence recognition in quiet by cochlear implant listeners.
Donaldson GS; Allen SL
Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):392-405. PubMed ID: 14534410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dynamic Current Focusing Compared to Monopolar Stimulation in a Take-Home Trial of Cochlear Implant Users.
van Groesen NRA; Briaire JJ; de Jong MAM; Frijns JHM
Ear Hear; 2023 Mar-Apr 01; 44(2):306-317. PubMed ID: 36279119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Measurements of monopolar and bipolar current spreads using forward-masking with a fixed probe.
Bingabr MG; Espinoza-Varas B; Sigdel S
Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 May; 15(3):166-72. PubMed ID: 24606491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Residual hearing conservation and electroacoustic stimulation with the nucleus 24 contour advance cochlear implant.
Fraysse B; Macías AR; Sterkers O; Burdo S; Ramsden R; Deguine O; Klenzner T; Lenarz T; Rodriguez MM; Von Wallenberg E; James C
Otol Neurotol; 2006 Aug; 27(5):624-33. PubMed ID: 16868510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Current steering and current focusing in cochlear implants: comparison of monopolar, tripolar, and virtual channel electrode configurations.
Berenstein CK; Mens LH; Mulder JJ; Vanpoucke FJ
Ear Hear; 2008 Apr; 29(2):250-60. PubMed ID: 18595189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of speech processing strategy on Chinese tone recognition by nucleus-24 cochlear implant users.
Fu QJ; Hsu CJ; Horng MJ
Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):501-8. PubMed ID: 15599196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
