154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16363077)
1. Mechanical testing of a novel hydrogel nucleus replacement implant.
Bertagnoli R; Sabatino CT; Edwards JT; Gontarz GA; Prewett A; Parsons JR
Spine J; 2005; 5(6):672-81. PubMed ID: 16363077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [An improved vertebral body replacement for the thoracolumbar spine. A biomechanical in vitro test on human lumbar vertebral bodies].
Reinhold M; Schmölz W; Canto F; Krappinger D; Blauth M; Knop C
Unfallchirurg; 2007 Apr; 110(4):327-33. PubMed ID: 17211598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Nucleus implant parameters significantly change the compressive stiffness of the human lumbar intervertebral disc.
Joshi A; Mehta S; Vresilovic E; Karduna A; Marcolongo M
J Biomech Eng; 2005 Jun; 127(3):536-40. PubMed ID: 16060361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Translational challenges for the development of a novel nucleus pulposus substitute: Experimental results from biomechanical and in vivo studies.
Detiger SE; de Bakker JY; Emanuel KS; Schmitz M; Vergroesen PP; van der Veen AJ; Mazel C; Smit TH
J Biomater Appl; 2016 Feb; 30(7):983-94. PubMed ID: 26494611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fill of the nucleus cavity affects mechanical stability in compression, bending, and torsion of a spine segment, which has undergone nucleus replacement.
Arthur A; Cannella M; Keane M; Singhatat W; Vresilovic E; Marcolongo M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 May; 35(11):1128-35. PubMed ID: 20473120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Response of Charité total disc replacement under physiologic loads: prosthesis component motion patterns.
O'Leary P; Nicolakis M; Lorenz MA; Voronov LI; Zindrick MR; Ghanayem A; Havey RM; Carandang G; Sartori M; Gaitanis IN; Fronczak S; Patwardhan AG
Spine J; 2005; 5(6):590-9. PubMed ID: 16291097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of nucleus replacement device properties on lumbar spine mechanics.
Rundell SA; Guerin HL; Auerbach JD; Kurtz SM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep; 34(19):2022-32. PubMed ID: 19730210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of implant size and device keel on vertebral compression properties in lumbar total disc replacement.
Auerbach JD; Ballester CM; Hammond F; Carine ET; Balderston RA; Elliott DM
Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):333-40. PubMed ID: 20362251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nucleus replacement could get a new chance with annulus closure.
Zengerle L; Köhler A; Debout E; Hackenbroch C; Wilke HJ
Eur Spine J; 2020 Jul; 29(7):1733-1741. PubMed ID: 32333186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Functional compressive mechanics of a PVA/PVP nucleus pulposus replacement.
Joshi A; Fussell G; Thomas J; Hsuan A; Lowman A; Karduna A; Vresilovic E; Marcolongo M
Biomaterials; 2006 Jan; 27(2):176-84. PubMed ID: 16115678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reducing subsidence risk by using rapid manufactured patient-specific intervertebral disc implants.
de Beer N; Scheffer C
Spine J; 2012 Nov; 12(11):1060-6. PubMed ID: 23103407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Restoration of compressive loading properties of lumbar discs with a nucleus implant-a finite element analysis study.
Strange DG; Fisher ST; Boughton PC; Kishen TJ; Diwan AD
Spine J; 2010 Jul; 10(7):602-9. PubMed ID: 20547110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The restoration of lumbar intervertebral disc load distribution: a comparison of three nucleus replacement technologies.
Dahl MC; Ahrens M; Sherman JE; Martz EO
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jul; 35(15):1445-53. PubMed ID: 20216342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fulcrum assisted soft stabilization system: a new concept in the surgical treatment of degenerative low back pain.
Sengupta DK; Mulholland RC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 May; 30(9):1019-29; discussion 1030. PubMed ID: 15864153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of a prosthetic disc nucleus on the mobility and disc height of the L4-5 intervertebral disc postnucleotomy.
Wilke HJ; Kavanagh S; Neller S; Haid C; Claes LE
J Neurosurg; 2001 Oct; 95(2 Suppl):208-14. PubMed ID: 11599838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is a collagen scaffold for a tissue engineered nucleus replacement capable of restoring disc height and stability in an animal model?
Wilke HJ; Heuer F; Neidlinger-Wilke C; Claes L
Eur Spine J; 2006 Aug; 15 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S433-8. PubMed ID: 16868784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of an In Situ Gelable and Injectable Hydrogel Treatment to Preserve Human Disc Mechanical Function Undergoing Physiologic Cyclic Loading Followed by Hydrated Recovery.
Showalter BL; Elliott DM; Chen W; Malhotra NR
J Biomech Eng; 2015 Aug; 137(8):081008. PubMed ID: 25950273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The implications of constraint in lumbar total disc replacement.
Huang RC; Girardi FP; Cammisa FP; Wright TM
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2003 Aug; 16(4):412-7. PubMed ID: 12902958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical evaluation of the kinematics of the cadaver lumbar spine following disc replacement with the ProDisc-L prosthesis.
Demetropoulos CK; Sengupta DK; Knaub MA; Wiater BP; Abjornson C; Truumees E; Herkowitz HN
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jan; 35(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 20042953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Basic principles of successful implantation of the SB Charité model LINK intervertebral disk endoprosthesis].
Büttner-Janz K; Hahn S; Schikora K; Link HD
Orthopade; 2002 May; 31(5):441-53. PubMed ID: 12089793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
