These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16363081)

  • 1. One bad apple: people will never trust science so long as researchers make up results.
    New Sci; 2005 Nov 5-11; 188(2524):3. PubMed ID: 16363081
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. MIT fires biology professor who admitted faking data.
    Jacobson J
    Chron High Educ; 2005 Nov; 52(12):A13. PubMed ID: 16358462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Trust and how to sustain it.
    Nature; 2002 Dec 19-26; 420(6917):719. PubMed ID: 12490891
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Misplaced faith.
    Nature; 2015 Jun; 522(7554):6. PubMed ID: 26040858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stop misbehaving!
    Neill US
    J Clin Invest; 2006 Jul; 116(7):1740-1. PubMed ID: 16823470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Acid Test for Biological Science: STAP Cells, Trust, and Replication.
    Lancaster C
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2016 Feb; 22(1):147-67. PubMed ID: 25649070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Purdue dogged by misconduct claims.
    Reich ES
    Nature; 2007 May; 447(7142):238-9. PubMed ID: 17507941
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Universities scramble to assess scope of falsified results.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 2005 Nov; 438(7064):7. PubMed ID: 16267515
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Agency for change.
    Nature; 2014 May; 509(7498):8. PubMed ID: 24784180
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Catching the crooks.
    Marris E
    Nat Med; 2006 May; 12(5):491. PubMed ID: 16675981
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Misconduct? It's all academic..
    Nature; 2007 Jan; 445(7125):240-1. PubMed ID: 17230159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Confidentiality is essential in misconduct inquiries.
    Mason S; Rutledge C
    Nature; 2007 Mar; 446(7135):492. PubMed ID: 17392764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A case of scientific misconduct: the cost of bad science.
    Broome ME
    Clin Nurse Spec; 2009; 23(5):268. PubMed ID: 19710574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The responsibility of scientists, a European view.
    Ernst RR
    Angew Chem Int Ed Engl; 2003 Sep; 42(37):4434-9. PubMed ID: 14520738
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. If you can lose a driving licence, why not a PhD?
    Hart AG
    Nature; 2004 Jul; 430(6999):503. PubMed ID: 15282578
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recognition could support a science code of conduct.
    Ropert-Coudert Y
    Nature; 2007 May; 447(7142):259. PubMed ID: 17507959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Doubts over biochemist's data expose holes in Japanese fraud laws.
    Fuyuno I; Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7076):514. PubMed ID: 16452938
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Image doctoring must be halted.
    Nature; 2017 Jun; 546(7660):575. PubMed ID: 28661501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do researchers learn to practice misbehavior?
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2006; 36(2):4. PubMed ID: 16604884
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Policing integrity.
    Nature; 2005 May; 435(7040):248. PubMed ID: 15902211
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.