These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16363467)
41. The McQuillan decision: civil rights for the mentally iii offender. Benedek EP; Farley G Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1977; 5(4):438-49. PubMed ID: 616310 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Research issues in forensic psychiatry. Van Marle H; Van der Kroft P Curr Opin Psychiatry; 2007 Sep; 20(5):511-5. PubMed ID: 17762598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. [Risk assessment in psychiatry--can violence in society be predicted? A systematic literature review from SBU]. Grann M; Pettersson A Lakartidningen; 2007 May 14-29; 104(20-21):1588-9. PubMed ID: 17564266 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. The precarious practice of forensic psychiatric risk assessments. Nilsson T; Munthe C; Gustavson C; Forsman A; Anckarsäter H Int J Law Psychiatry; 2009; 32(6):400-7. PubMed ID: 19800123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Cues they use: clinicians' endorsement of risk cues in predictions of dangerousness. Odeh MS; Zeiss RA; Huss MT Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(2):147-56. PubMed ID: 16557618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Impact of clinical training on violence risk assessment. McNiel DE; Chamberlain JR; Weaver CM; Hall SE; Fordwood SR; Binder RL Am J Psychiatry; 2008 Feb; 165(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 18245189 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Combining clinical and actuarial methods to assess and manage risk in a New South Wales forensic psychiatric setting. Samuels A; O'Driscoll C; Bazaley M Australas Psychiatry; 2005 Sep; 13(3):285-90. PubMed ID: 16174203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Mental disorder, predisposition, prediction, and ability to control: evaluating sex offenders for civil commitment. Elwood RW Sex Abuse; 2009 Dec; 21(4):395-411. PubMed ID: 19901235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Are violence risk assessment tools clinically useful? Carroll A Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 2007 Apr; 41(4):301-7. PubMed ID: 17464716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. [Application of contribute degree in forensic mental trauma assessments]. Xing XY Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Oct; 22(5):365-6, 369. PubMed ID: 17190152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Forensic psychiatric assessment in European Union member states. Dressing H; Salize HJ Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2006 Oct; 114(4):282-9. PubMed ID: 16968366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. A Personal Reflection on Psychiatrists and Homicidal Threats. Gulati G J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2020 Jun; 48(2):259-260. PubMed ID: 32513760 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Dangerousness: in the eye of the beholder? Am J Psychiatry; 1981 Jul; 138(7):995-6. PubMed ID: 7258370 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Reliability and validity of the Dutch version of the Behavioural Status Index: a nurse-rated forensic assessment tool. Chakhssi F; de Ruiter C; Bernstein D Assessment; 2010 Mar; 17(1):58-69. PubMed ID: 19700739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. [The dangerous patient--three causes of shortages within psychiatry]. Agren H Lakartidningen; 2003 Sep; 100(39):3068-9. PubMed ID: 14560673 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. The uncritical acceptance of risk assessment in forensic practice. Rogers R Law Hum Behav; 2000 Oct; 24(5):595-605. PubMed ID: 11026213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Wiggins v. Smith 539 U.S. 510 (2003). Silver MS J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(2):279; discussion 279-81. PubMed ID: 15985681 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]