469 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16363752)
1. Abruptio placentae associated with misoprostol use in women with preeclampsia.
Fontenot MT; Lewis DF; Barton CB; Jones EM; Moore JA; Evans AT
J Reprod Med; 2005 Sep; 50(9):653-8. PubMed ID: 16363752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The risk of placental abruption when using prostaglandins for cervical ripening in women with preeclampsia: comparing misoprostol versus dinoprostone.
Martinez de Tejada B; Martillotti G; Lapaire O; Hoesli I; Irion O
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2010 Sep; 23(9):988-93. PubMed ID: 19941444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cardiotocographic abnormalities associated with misoprostol and dinoprostone cervical ripening and labor induction.
Pevzner L; Alfirevic Z; Powers BL; Wing DA
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Jun; 156(2):144-8. PubMed ID: 21353372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of misoprostol for cervical ripening.
Katz VL; Farmer RM; Dean CA; Carpenter ME
South Med J; 2000 Sep; 93(9):881-4. PubMed ID: 11005347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial.
Denguezli W; Trimech A; Haddad A; Hajjaji A; Saidani Z; Faleh R; Sakouhi M
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug; 276(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17219155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outpatient misoprostol compared with dinoprostone gel for preinduction cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial.
Meyer M; Pflum J; Howard D
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 105(3):466-72. PubMed ID: 15738009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Misoprostol vaginal insert compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert: a randomized controlled trial.
Wing DA;
Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Oct; 112(4):801-12. PubMed ID: 18827122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cardiotocographic abnormalities associated with dinoprostone and misoprostol cervical ripening.
Ramsey PS; Meyer L; Walkes BA; Harris D; Ogburn PL; Heise RH; Ramin KD
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jan; 105(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 15625147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Comparative study of the effect of intravaginal misoprostol at 50 and 100 micrograms in cervical ripening and labor induction].
Reyna-Villasmil E; Guerra-Velásquez M; Torres-Montilla M; Reyna-Villasmil N; Mejia-Montilla J; Labarca-Vincero N
Invest Clin; 2005 Jun; 46(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 16001749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Vaginal misoprostol versus concentrated oxytocin and vaginal PGE2 for second-trimester labor induction.
Ramsey PS; Savage K; Lincoln T; Owen J
Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 104(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 15229013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of misoprostol or prostaglandin E(2) for induction of labor on the incidence of pathological CTG tracing: a randomized trial.
Megalo A; Petignat P; Hohlfeld P
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2004 Sep; 116(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 15294364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison between vaginal misoprostol and cervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Neiger R; Greaves PC
Tenn Med; 2001 Jan; 94(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 11194687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A randomised controlled trial of low-dose misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal pessaries for cervical priming.
Tan TC; Yan SY; Chua TM; Biswas A; Chong YS
BJOG; 2010 Sep; 117(10):1270-7. PubMed ID: 20722643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Induction of labour in nulliparous and multiparous women: a UK, multicentre, open-label study of intravaginal misoprostol in comparison with dinoprostone.
Calder AA; Loughney AD; Weir CJ; Barber JW
BJOG; 2008 Sep; 115(10):1279-88. PubMed ID: 18715414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pre-induction cervical ripening: transcervical foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol.
Adeniji OA; Oladokun A; Olayemi O; Adeniji OI; Odukogbe AA; Ogunbode O; Aimakhu CO; Omigbodun AO; Ilesanmi AO
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Feb; 25(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 15814391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Randomized controlled trial of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert for labor induction.
Garry D; Figueroa R; Kalish RB; Catalano CJ; Maulik D
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2003 Apr; 13(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 12854927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A randomized clinical trial to compare the efficacy of different doses of intravaginal misoprostol with intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Saxena P; Puri M; Bajaj M; Mishra A; Trivedi SS
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2011 Jul; 15(7):759-63. PubMed ID: 21780543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A randomized comparison between misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction in patients with unfavorable cervices.
Buser D; Mora G; Arias F
Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Apr; 89(4):581-5. PubMed ID: 9083316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Cervical ripening at term. A randomized and prospective study: Misoprotol versus dinoprostone].
Trabelsi H; Mathlouthi N; Zayen S; Dhouib M; Chaabene K; Trabelsi K; Amouri H; Ben Ayed B; Guermazi M
Tunis Med; 2012 May; 90(5):362-9. PubMed ID: 22585642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
